Temenos Quantum and GitLab are both prominent in the technology market, with GitLab leading in feature-rich DevOps solutions, whereas Temenos Quantum is recognized for its pricing and support excellence.
Features: Temenos Quantum offers multi-experience development capabilities, seamless cross-platform integration, and robust security features. GitLab provides an all-inclusive DevOps platform, advanced version control, and continuous integration and deployment functionalities.
Room for Improvement: Temenos Quantum may face challenges with its initial setup complexity, limited maturity, and integration issues. GitLab could expand its feature set, enhance documentation for beginners, and address some performance concerns.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Temenos Quantum offers flexible deployment options but involves setup complexities. GitLab simplifies deployment with well-integrated pipelines and provides excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum appeals to cost-conscious businesses with competitive pricing and positive ROI from lower setup costs. GitLab, though potentially having higher initial costs, offers high ROI through comprehensive features and efficiencies.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features.
The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
It helped me personally and my team to save time and money.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.