GitLab and Snyk both compete in the DevOps tools category. GitLab seems to have the upper hand in repository management and CI/CD capabilities, while Snyk performs well in vulnerability management and integrations.
Features: GitLab provides extensive features for repository management and CI/CD pipelines, offering code review, branch management, and scalable integration options. Users enjoy the user-friendly interface, although there may be a decline in feature richness. Snyk excels in vulnerability management with simple, self-service options and integrations with IDEs and CI systems, featuring a comprehensive vulnerability database and developer-friendly tools.
Room for Improvement: GitLab could enhance AWS and container management integrations and improve project management tool integration, with users seeking better dashboards, reporting, and security integrations. Snyk could benefit from additional SAST/DAST capabilities and enhanced reporting, while refining licensing compliance and expanding language support would also be advantageous.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers deployment across various environments including public, private, and hybrid clouds. Users have mixed experiences with their support but generally find on-premises deployment common and customer service responsive. Snyk predominantly deploys in public clouds, offering solid customer support similar in experience to GitLab, emphasizing licensed support.
Pricing and ROI: GitLab offers a free open-source version with scalable paid tiers. Although considered expensive for smaller teams, it provides value for its rich features. Snyk is also seen as costly but offers good value, pricing based on active committers with negotiation flexibility. Both emphasize ROI, with GitLab focusing on time-saving automation and agile processes, while Snyk concentrates on security and coverage.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The best feature of Snyk is the integration with our ticketing system, which is Jira.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Snyk | 6.5% |
GitLab | 2.5% |
Other | 91.0% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 35 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 42 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 21 |
GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.
GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.
What are GitLab's most valuable features?In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.