GitLab vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitLab and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. GitLab holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 82 GitLab reviews

3,648 Views
3,011 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,221 Views
2,172 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitLab

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitLab are distinguished tools competing in the application security and DevOps platform category, respectively. GitLab seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive approach, providing a more extensive solution to DevOps needs while still offering significant security features.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional includes robust security testing tools, supports automated security test capabilities, and enables precise vulnerability identification. GitLab provides CI/CD integration, version control, and project management capabilities, making it suitable for various DevOps processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance reporting capabilities, improve export format options, and refine user interface design. GitLab could benefit from more intuitive administrative controls, increased performance speed for large projects, and streamlined process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward deployment, suited to those needing seamless integration. GitLab's multifaceted setup can challenge users initially, but its customer service support is appreciated after acclimation.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users are satisfied with cost-effectiveness in security testing. GitLab, while having higher initial setup costs, is valued for strong ROI through its extensive tool suite, proving worthwhile for larger teams seeking a unified platform.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."

"I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently."

"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."

"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."

"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."

"The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute."

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."

More GitLab pros

"It offers flexibility, macros, and features to reduce the effort required for authenticated sessions."

"Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them."

"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."

"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."

"I personally love its capability to automatically and accurately detect vulnerabilities. So, I would say it is the Burp scanner that is THE most powerful, valuable, and an awesome feature."

"The solution has a limited range of functions, which is good for small companies. This is because, in small companies, websites are less complex. They also have single services which makes the solution good enough for them. However, the most advantageous aspect of the solution is its affordable price."

"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."

"I find the attack model quite amazing, where I can write my scripts and load my scripts as well, which helps quite a bit. All the active scanning that it can do is also quite a lot helpful. It speeds up our vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. Right now, I am enjoying its in-browser, which also helps quite a bit. I'm always confused about setting up some proxy, but it really is the big solution we all want."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

"It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

More GitLab cons

"The tool is very expensive."

"The Initial setup is a bit complex."

"One thing that is not up to the mark in PortSwigger is web application testing. I found some issues with its performance and reporting. They should work on these and give us a better outcome."

"The solution doesn't offer very good scalability."

"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"There needs to be better documentation provided. Currently, we need to buy books, or we need to review online some use cases from other professionals who have been using the solution to find out their experience. It is not easy to find out how to properly do a security assessment."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 20% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 15% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

April 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Burp

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, and best Fuzz Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.