No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitGuardian Platform vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (6th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (5th)
Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

GitGuardian Platform and Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. GitGuardian Platform is designed for Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) and holds a mindshare of 3.2%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal, on the other hand, focuses on Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP), holds 1.6% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitGuardian Platform3.2%
Saviynt Identity Cloud11.8%
Veza9.0%
Other76.0%
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal1.6%
Recorded Future6.0%
Anomali3.9%
Other88.5%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2886744 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous secret monitoring has improved our incident response and protected exposed credentials
One area for improvement in GitGuardian Platform would be reducing false positives and making alert prioritization even more precise for larger environments; more customization around notifications and remediation workflows would also help teams avoid alert fatigue as the number of repositories grows. Regarding improvements needed for GitGuardian Platform, I would appreciate more flexibility in integrations, especially with different DevOps, ticketing, and security tools used across enterprise environments; while the UI is generally easy to use, better customization of dashboards and alert views would make it easier to manage a large number of repositories. I chose eight out of ten for GitGuardian Platform mainly because there is still room for improvement in enterprise integrations and customization; for larger environments, better alert prioritization, dashboard flexibility, and integration with more DevOps and security tools would strengthen the overall experience. The main areas we discussed primarily cover everything, but beyond those, I would appreciate more granular role-based controls and easier customization of alert workflows, especially for larger teams where different groups may need different levels of visibility and access.
Abdelrahman Hussein - PeerSpot reviewer
CTI & Threat Hunter at Telecom Egypt
Provides useful real-time threat intelligence features but has limited capabilities
We use the product to search for IoCs. It is a good tool, but we do not use all its capabilities. We have only done a POC of the product. The real-time threat intelligence features are useful. The tool has good capabilities. It has a database of IoCs The solution is limited. I have been using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"GitGuardian Platform has positively impacted our organization as it helps us reduce the number of secrets that we would accidentally commit into source code."
"We have definitely seen a return on investment when it finds things that are real. We have caught a couple things before they made it to production, and had they made it to production, that would have been dangerous."
"The most valuable feature is the general incident reporting system."
"The stability of the GitGuardian Platform is excellent."
"What I appreciate the most about GitGuardian Platform is its efficiency when triggering our pipeline and notifying us if secrets have been exposed, such as APIs, variables, our database, or anything being exposed."
"The most valuable feature is the alerts when secrets are leaked and we can look at particular repositories to see if there are any outstanding problems. In addition, the solution's detection capabilities seem very broad. We have no concerns there."
"What is particularly helpful is that having GitGuardian show that the code failed a check enables us to automatically pass the resolution to the author. We don't have to rely on the reviewer to assign it back to him or her. Letting the authors solve their own problems before they get to the reviewer has significantly improved visibility and reduced the remediation time from multiple days to minutes or hours. Given how time-consuming code reviews can be, it saves some of our more scarce resources."
"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."
"The solution improved our overall security posture."
"The real-time threat intelligence features are useful."
 

Cons

"There are some features that are lacking in GitGuardian."
"For some repositories, there are a lot of incidents. For example, one repository says 255 occurrences, so I assume these are 255 alerts and nobody is doing anything about them."
"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."
"There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack."
"I would like to see more fine-grained access controls when tickets are assigned for incidents. I would like the ability to provide more controls to the team leads or the product managers so that they can drive what we, the AppSec team, are doing."
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."
"One area of improvement for GitGuardian Platform would be reducing false positives and making some alerts easier to prioritize."
"We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times."
"The solution is limited."
"More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."
"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."
"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."
"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."
"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."
"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."
"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."
"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.
916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise28
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
What is your primary use case for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
Our current use cases for GitGuardian Platform involve monitoring external and internal GitHub and GitLab, Bitbucket, and other code repositories that it supports for secrets.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Backed by a $50M Series C raised in February 2026 (Insight Partners, Quadrille Capital) and trusted by 600K+ developers, GitGuardian is the #1 most-installed security app on the GitHub Marketplace. Enterprises including Snowflake, ING, BASF, Datadog, Bouygues Telecom, Euronext, and Orange Business rely on the platform.
Telefonica, VimpelCom, Monclick, Ezenta
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, Astrix Security, Entro Security and others in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM). Updated: September 2026.
916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.