GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune comparison

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #16, while Ivanti is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. GFI holds a 2.4% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,158 Views
1,146 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Read 11 Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune reviews

823 Views
823 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune are two prominent patch management solutions. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune leads in terms of features, even though GFI LanGuard is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Users value GFI LanGuard's comprehensive network security scanning capabilities. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is praised for its seamless integration with Intune and advanced automation. Ivanti Neurons has the upper hand due to its modern architecture and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Users mention the need for a more intuitive system and quicker updates for GFI LanGuard. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune users highlight issues with initial setup complexity and occasional performance lags. Both products could enhance specific functionalities, but Ivanti's setup and performance need more immediate attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune faces criticism for its complicated deployment steps yet receives credit for effective support once operational. GFI LanGuard offers an easier deployment experience, while Ivanti provides commendable post-deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard is noted for its cost-effectiveness and positive ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, despite higher costs, is considered worth the investment due to advanced capabilities. GFI LanGuard presents a more economical choice, whereas Ivanti offers greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,227 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Neurons Patch for In...

Ranking in Patch Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GFI LanGuard	2.4%
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune	2.2%
Other	95.4%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Phung Anh

IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17

Keeping servers updated while encountering documentation issues and time zone delays in support

In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing. Sometimes I had to uninstall, reinstall, or engage technical support, which took a lot of time. It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune pros

Cons

"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."

"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,227 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

18%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Windows?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The only downside I found regarding technical support was the time zone difference. Since we are two hours behind, we occasionally had to wait until the next morning for assistance. I would rate th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Windows?

The primary use case of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune ( /products/ivanti-neurons-patch-for-intune-reviews ) was primarily for updating all servers, ensuring that both main servers and production ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 16% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 12% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 11% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 8% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Compared 8% of the time

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

January 2026

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

January 2026

Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Presbyterian Church

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

December 2025

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,227 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.