Fortinet FortiSIEM and Google Chronicle Suite are both powerful tools in the cybersecurity space, yet they offer distinct advantages. Google Chronicle Suite seems to have the upper hand for its feature richness and efficiency, justifying its high cost for many users.
Features: Fortinet FortiSIEM offers comprehensive security event management capabilities, flexible integration, and cost-effectiveness. Google Chronicle Suite provides robust data analytics, scalability, and real-time threat detection.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiSIEM could enhance its reporting capabilities, provide better documentation, and improve ease of use. Google Chronicle Suite would benefit from better integration with third-party tools, more intuitive setup processes, and a more responsive support system.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiSIEM deployment can be challenging, often requiring professional services, although customer service is generally positive. Google Chronicle Suite has a straightforward deployment process due to its cloud-based architecture, and users commend its prompt and helpful customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSIEM is seen as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, despite some concerns about high initial setup costs. Google Chronicle Suite, although more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its advanced features and long-term benefits.
Local tech support is available, however, for more critical or technical issues, we depend on the OEM directly, especially when it comes to on-prem solutions.
There is a knowledgeable, though small, team of support engineers around the world.
They take some time to respond because they need logs and investigations, which delays the response time.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
At any point in time, when network devices increase or there is a change in the infrastructure, we can add more workers and collectors to expand our infrastructure setup.
Fortinet FortiSIEM is highly scalable.
Fortinet FortiSIEM is easy to scale.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
It stabilizes itself in an appropriate time, so its uptime is good.
These issues may cause unusual errors and user interface issues.
Some stability issues occur, but Fortinet's technical support team provides assistance.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
Recently, they revised it to a subscription-based, all-inclusive license.
The built-in APIs in Fortinet FortiSIEM are somewhat lacking and could be improved for better integration with external ITSM products.
Fortinet FortiSIEM should broaden its remediation part to include more features for incident management.
The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
Setting it up for oneself as an enterprise-licensed product can be quite expensive.
Windows agent licenses cost around 3,000 Rupees per device per year.
The revised model is subscription-based and more flexible.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
It provides extensive logging and record-keeping for internal networks, cloud applications, and services as well as perimeter physical network security.
I find the real-time monitoring and correlation capabilities effective for security alerts.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiSIEM | 3.2% |
| Google Chronicle Suite | 2.8% |
| Other | 94.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 34 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
FortiSIEM (formerly AccelOps 4) provides an actionable security intelligence platform to monitor security, performance and compliance through a single pane of glass.
Companies around the world use FortiSIEM for the following use cases:
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
