Elastic Security and Google Chronicle Suite are both leading cybersecurity platforms. Google Chronicle Suite appears to have the upper hand due to its scalability and threat detection accuracy.
Features: Elastic Security offers advanced data visualization, integration capabilities, and comprehensive search capabilities. Google Chronicle Suite excels in scalability, threat detection accuracy, and efficient large-scale data handling.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Security users report the need for better documentation, more intuitive navigation, and faster data indexing. Google Chronicle Suite users seek enhanced customization, improved integration options, and a more user-friendly interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security has mixed reviews on deployment but is noted for responsive customer service. Google Chronicle Suite has a smoother deployment experience but slower support response.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is viewed as cost-effective with a complex initial setup but favorable ROI. Google Chronicle Suite is considered more expensive, justified by its performance and comprehensive coverage, delivering better overall value.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Support is prompt and helpful.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Security | 5.0% |
| Google Chronicle Suite | 2.8% |
| Other | 92.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
