Fortinet FortiNDR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Fortinet and Trellix are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Fortinet is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.5, while Trellix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.6. Fortinet holds a 3.3% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Trellix’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiNDR

Read 2 Fortinet FortiNDR reviews

468 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 39 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

566 Views
108 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiNDR

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNDR and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiNDR

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

13th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiNDR is 3.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 2.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

Anton Anton

IT Manager at sanf

Network detection enhances security while seamless integration boosts utility

I use Fortinet FortiNDR for its Network Detection features, primarily with FortiGate on-premises. However, I do not handle day-to-day operations myself; my team manages the tools. In general, there is no issue with FortiGate in our company Some of the valuable features include FortiGate's Network…

Read full review

BiswabhanuPanda

Senior technical consultant at Hitachi Systems Micro Clinic

Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one

The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using Fortinet FortiNDR as a bundle is cost-effective, providing a complete package of tools."

"The dashboards are very informative compared to other solutions like Cisco, providing valuable insights into network threats."

"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."

"Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."

"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."

"The server appliance is good."

"We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."

"Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly effective in mitigating these threats."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"I would like to see the inclusion of sandboxing in the bundling. Currently, sandbox is not included in our package."

"There is room for improvement in third-party integrations, particularly with other vendors like Check Point and Palo Alto."

"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."

"A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."

"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."

"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."

"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."

"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."

"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."

"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"The pricing is a little high."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"It's an expensive solution."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiNDR?

Using Fortinet FortiNDR as a bundle is cost-effective, providing a complete package of tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiNDR?

I would like to see the inclusion of sandboxing in the bundling. Currently, sandbox is not included in our package.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiNDR?

I use Fortinet FortiNDR ( /products/fortinet-fortindr-reviews ) for its Network Detection features, primarily with FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) on-premises. However, I do not ...

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

While I do not handle pricing directly, it is known that there is a variety of customers with different licensing needs, which depends on the organization's size and policy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response. Networking often involves complexity that c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Fortinet FortiNDR

Compared 54% of the time

Vectra AI vs Fortinet FortiNDR

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Fortinet FortiNDR

Compared 10% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Fortinet FortiNDR

Compared 9% of the time

Sangfor Cyber Command vs Fortinet FortiNDR

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiNDR Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 12% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

June 2025

Download Fortinet FortiNDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

May 2025

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

No data available

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

Fortinet FortiNDR offers comprehensive network detection and response capabilities, enhancing threat detection and providing an additional layer of security for organizations. Its advanced technology helps in identifying suspicious activities and mitigating cybersecurity risks effectively.

Fortinet FortiNDR is designed to deliver efficient threat detection and response through its machine learning techniques and behavioral analysis. It integrates seamlessly into existing IT environments, offering a holistic approach to cybersecurity. Its ability to detect and respond to threats in real-time makes it a valuable asset for organizations seeking to bolster their security infrastructure. Fortinet FortiNDR also provides insights that help in understanding threats better, enabling faster response to incidents.

What are the valuable features of Fortinet FortiNDR?

Behavioral Analysis: Detects abnormal activities using advanced algorithms.
Machine Learning: Enhances threat detection efficiency.
Real-time Alerts: Provides instant notifications for suspicious activities.
Seamless Integration: Fits into current IT systems effortlessly.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network security needs.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Improved Threat Detection: Reduces incident response times.
Cost-effective Security: Minimizes financial losses from breaches.
Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers in-depth analysis of network activities.
Reduced Operational Expenses: Streamlines security management processes.
Future-proof Technology: Adapts to new threats continuously.

Fortinet FortiNDR is effectively implemented in industries demanding high-level security such as finance, healthcare, and energy. Its capabilities cater to the unique security challenges faced by these sectors by providing tailored detection mechanisms and response strategies, ensuring comprehensive protection and operational continuity.

Fortinet

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

June 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiNDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.