Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Authentication Systems (3rd), Identity Management (IM) (7th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (3rd)
One Identity Safeguard
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 8.8%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Unique Categories:
Authentication Systems
9.6%
Identity Management (IM)
3.3%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
2.2%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
4.8%
 

Featured Reviews

Jared Carmouche - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2023
An extremely stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to manage
We use the solution for different clients and how they authenticate for VPN and Wi-Fi. We also use it for the captive portal and single sign-on. We use it for quite a bit for authentication The product has become a central hub for how dozens of our clients authenticate to VPN and Wi-Fi. It has…
Daniel Pettersson - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 28, 2023
Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access
Safeguard, the way I see it, has two different parts: vaulting and sessions. And those two are running on different platforms. The vault itself is a locked-down Windows box, which isn't really causing any trouble. The session part is on a Linux box. They sell them separately, but together, they need to be more unified, at least from a UI perspective when you're using it as an administrator. There are some "legacy-level" menus and ways of using it that I don't really appreciate. We are using it completely web-based, not through a fat client. The browser experience of administrating SPS (Safeguard for Privileged Sessions) needs a lot of attention from an administrative perspective to make it easier. The readability of the system itself is quite poor. A user never really engages with that part. It's only the administrator, and maybe an auditor, who are subjected to using those menus and tools. So the SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The first valuable feature is being able to see everything on one platform. This includes logs and authentication failure."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"This is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is the OTP on the mobile phone."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."
"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."
"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."
"All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI."
"It is generally easy-to-use and install."
"We deployed it into our company for controlling a client's behavior in our data center. It is very useful to control their connections, such as RDP."
"All the features are promising, but we love the reporting feature because we can get each and every report. That's a major compliance requirement. Its reporting is really amazing, and it has made life a lot easier."
"The Transparent Mode is the number one advantage of the product."
 

Cons

"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible."
"The product must provide full support for third-party FIDO security keys."
"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"The SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together."
"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."
"We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates."
"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."
"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."
"Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support."
"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."
"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The customers need to pay for licenses, and some pay on a yearly basis while others pay on a three-yearly or five-yearly basis. Also, it is not an expensive solution."
"It's not expensive."
"I price of the solution is expensive."
"I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not that costly. It is cheap, easy to manage, easy to install, and easy to configure."
"The product has affordable pricing compared to other vendors."
"The price seems okay. It's not that expensive compared to other authenticators."
"When we buy the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator device there is a comparison between price and security."
"Between paying them to help with the configuration, the box itself, and the support, it came to like $12,500, including a three-year service agreement."
"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."
"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."
"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."
"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."
"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."
"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
The price seems okay. It's not that expensive compared to other authenticators. Especially the clients, like Fortinet VPN clients, it is free. Unless you take the full feature of the FortiClient, t...
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
One thing I dislike is that if you have the software authenticator on a mobile device and that device is lost, it's difficult to remove. If you have the FortiAuthenticator client installed on your ...
What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?
The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base. Usually, they start at one price, and when you start pricing the competition, you ...
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them. In general, it is a pretty good solution for the PSM features. There can be an improvement in terms of...
 

Also Known As

FortiAuthenticator
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Cavium
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.