Fortify Application Defender vs Snyk comparison

Fortify Application Defender

Read 50 Snyk reviews

19,806 Views
8,319 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2025

Fortify Application Defender and Snyk compete in the application security space. Snyk seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive coverage and leading features, despite Fortify's competitive pricing and support.

Features: Fortify Application Defender offers real-time protection for existing applications, automated vulnerability notifications, and machine learning algorithms for dynamic threat detection. Snyk provides an extensive open-source vulnerability library, integration capabilities, and developer-friendly interfaces that enable quick identification and resolution of vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Fortify Application Defender could enhance its dynamic update capabilities, expand integration flexibility, and improve the user interface for more intuitive operation. Snyk could improve its customer service responsiveness, expand its vulnerability library further, and enhance support for more cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Application Defender is praised for its easy deployment and swift customer support, facilitating smoother implementations. Snyk offers flexible deployment options, particularly in cloud setups, although its customer service responsiveness lags behind Fortify.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify Application Defender offers a cost-effective setup with satisfactory immediate ROI for organizations focusing on security without dynamic updates. Snyk's higher pricing is justified by greater long-term ROI due to its advanced features and comprehensive security measures, benefiting investments in enhanced protection strategies over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Application Defender vs. Snyk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Fortify Application Defender vs. Snyk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Application Defender

Ranking in Application Security Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), GRC (5th), Cloud Management (13th), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (3rd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd), AI Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Fortify Application Defender is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 6.1%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Snyk	6.1%
Fortify Application Defender	1.0%
Other	92.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

VinothSivam

CTO at Abcl

Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines

I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten. However, I'm concerned about how it handles an increasing number of lines of code. As the complexity grows, so does the time it takes for the tool to review everything. I want more clarity on how Fortify Application Defender handles multiple threats. We have numerous endpoints, but the tool runs in our pipeline, meaning it operates in the cloud. All our code is configured there, and the tool runs integration testing, unit testing, user testing, and final production code tests. It's a day-to-day experience. It's utilized almost every day as part of our pipeline runs. Each team responsible for integration testing, human testing, user access testing, and preproduction testing runs it whenever they take a build.

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization."

"The most valuable feature is that it analyzes data in real-time."

"The tool's most valuable feature is software composition analysis. This feature works well with my .NET applications, providing a better understanding of library vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable features of Fortify Application Defender are the code packages that are default."

"The product saves us cost and time."

"We are able to provide out customers with a secure application after development. They are no longer left wondering if they are vulnerable to different threats within the market following deployment."

"I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy."

"The information from Fortify Application Defender on how to fix and solve issues is very good compared to other solutions."

More Fortify Application Defender pros

"Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution."

"Its reports are nice and provide information about the issue as well as resolution. They also provide a proper fix. If there's an issue, they provide information in detail about how to remediate that issue."

"Our customers find container scans most valuable. They are always talking about it."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

"Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients."

"Provides clear information and is easy to follow with good feedback regarding code practices."

"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and security checks. Many independent and open-source tools are available, from Apache to various libraries. Using multiple DevOps pipeline tools can slow the turnaround time."

"The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours."

"Fortify Application Defender could improve by supporting more code languages, such as GRAAS and Groovy."

"Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"The biggest complaint that I have heard concerns additional platform support because right now, it only supports applications that are written in .NET and Java."

"The licensing can be a little complex."

"The false positive rate should be lower."

More Fortify Application Defender cons

"Although Snyk is strong, sometimes it flags vulnerabilities that are not reachable, not exploitable, and not relevant to a project."

"Generating reports and visibility through reports are definitely things they can do better."

"Snyk's API and UI features could work better in terms of speed."

"I would like to give further ability to grouping code repositories, in such a way that you could group them by the teams that own them, then produce alerting to those teams. The way that we are seeing it right now, the alerting only goes to a couple of places. I wish we could configure the code to go to different places."

"I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial. I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough."

"The feature for automatic fixing of security breaches could be improved."

"The solution could improve the reports. They have been working on improving the reports but more work could be done."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is much higher than other tools."

"The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."

"The price of this solution could be less expensive."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."

"The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."

"Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."

"With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

"I would rate the pricing of Snyk at two. I'm currently using the free version, which the company offers before buying the full version. So, the price is affordable, especially for an enterprise."

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them."

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Application Defender?

I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.

What needs improvement with Fortify Application Defender?

The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and...

What is your primary use case for Fortify Application Defender?

We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Application Defender

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 11% of the time

Coverity Static vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 9% of the time

Klocwork vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 7% of the time

Blue Cedar vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortify Application Defender Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 15% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Tools

November 2025

Download Fortify Application Defender product report

Download Snyk product report

December 2025

Also Known As

HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

OpenText

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Sample Customers

ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief