


Forcepoint ONE and Idira Secure Cloud Access compete in cloud security solutions, each having distinguishing features. Forcepoint ONE has an advantage in integrating cloud applications and cost efficiency, while Idira excels in compliance and auditing capabilities preferred in secure environments.
Features: Forcepoint ONE provides Zero Trust Network Access, DLP, and seamless integration with cloud applications like Microsoft 365. These features aid SaaS platform control and policy management. Zero Trust Network Access, in particular, helps assign trust to users, providing access to resources while enhancing security. By contrast, Idira Secure Cloud Access is strong in identity-based access controls, comprehensive compliance features, and audit trails, making it suitable for securing hybrid and private cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint ONE could improve scalability for hybrid environments and enhance customer support. It should advance its endpoint DLP solution and integrate more third-party authentication tools. Idira Secure Cloud Access could simplify its setup process, improve its user interface, and offer deeper integration with existing IT ecosystems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint ONE supports public and hybrid cloud deployments. Some users report excellent customer support, while others experience delays. Idira Secure Cloud Access offers robust, tailored support, praised for its ease of deployment in private and hybrid clouds.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint ONE offers competitive pricing and bundled packages that lead to cost savings. Idira Secure Cloud Access's pricing is higher, especially during the initial setup due to extensive integration efforts. However, larger enterprises benefit from its comprehensive features, justifying the cost. Both products demonstrate significant ROI, with Forcepoint ONE noted for cost reductions and Idira delivering enhanced compliance and security outcomes.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
I have seen some cost effectiveness from iboss; it has reduced certain support requirements, making it a more hands-off solution.
I have fewer employees because Forcepoint ONE does the work that I used to rely on a team of engineers to previously detect.
Since I'm on the technical side, I don't handle ROI or financial metrics directly, but based on client feedback, many have seen improvements in operational efficiency mainly through centralized policy management and reduced manual investigation time, resulting in time savings and better visibility across their environments.
It is very difficult to measure the return on investment, but the control for the data is very important for companies because without an application similar to Forcepoint ONE, there is no control.
We have reduced approximately 70 to 75 percent of our time when accessing resources through CyberArk Secure Cloud Access.
Additionally, we have money saved in the long run on infrastructure costs.
I have seen a return on investment; from a security point of view, it helps us in terms of time as well as manpower.
They are very fast, responsive, and knowledgeable.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
Having a local principal support available also helps speed up communication and coordination, especially for urgent or region-specific cases.
An engineer comes to resolve the issue.
They are responsive and assist me with creating cases for any complex issues.
They adhere to SLAs, and most issues are resolved effectively.
As long as you have a license from them, the support is available during deployment.
They are helpful and provide enterprise-level support with knowledgeable engineers and ample documentation, especially during setup and critical issue handling.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
It can easily scale to support thousands of users and devices without requiring major infrastructure changes.
Forcepoint ONE runs smoothly, and scaling is easy.
Forcepoint ONE is very scalable because it is located in the cloud, and I don't have to manage the machines or anything with the infrastructure.
If you have a small to medium-sized enterprise, you can typically complete your deployment in roughly a week.
When it comes to performance, I am definitely satisfied with CyberArk Secure Cloud Access on the IT estate.
Ensuring that users can only access servers with the proper multi-factor authentication and manager approval.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
We've experienced zero downtime.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
Forcepoint ONE is very stable.
There have been some specific outcomes since switching to Forcepoint ONE.
I think Forcepoint ONE is pretty stable, as the connection and agent synchronization are reliable, but it can still be improved.
The platform achieves strong uptime and stability amongst enterprise-level security.
If CyberArk Secure Cloud Access is down, you cannot access anything, which is a double-edged sword.
The stability from a security perspective is quite good.
It is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform.
We also had a problem with a transition when we upgraded from one appliance of theirs to another, but their engineer lost a good deal of our data.
Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc.
I need to control specific functionalities within certain applications, like preventing the transfer of certain file types.
Having more flexible reporting and alert customization to tailor insights for different clients and compliance needs would be beneficial.
There is room for improvement in making the reporting closer to real-time, ideally around five or ten minutes instead of half an hour.
It is important for critical support to respond within fifteen to twenty minutes to minimize business impact.
You need to understand every component because the least mistake results in being completely locked out of the system.
More guided deployment wizards, better automated onboarding templates, improved UI/UX experiences, simplified policy management, and enhanced reporting and troubleshooting would be beneficial.
It offers the same features you would get from a vendor that charges 250,000 British pounds for a fraction of the price.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
The pricing is very good and cheaper than other solutions like Netskope and Forcepoint.
the pricing is better than all
The licensing and pricing were fine with no issues.
I am not directly involved in pricing aspects, but I am aware that CyberArk is considered costly compared to other products.
The setup cost initially will be higher as it needs to be integrated with different applications that the organization has.
The pricing for CyberArk Secure Cloud Access is quite high, especially the initial implementation cost, as it requires skilled engineers for deployment, configuration, and integration with various tools.
The solution's mental health function can detect if someone needs help.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
The most valuable feature was the website blocking capability, which allowed me to quickly block any dodgy websites.
It shortens response time for our clients, allowing their security team to view incidents in real-time, classify them easily, and focus on genuine risks instead of sorting through false positives, and it simplifies reporting and audit preparation since all the relevant data is consolidated in one place.
Forcepoint ONE made a difference, particularly regarding cost reduction because all the features that Forcepoint ONE bundles are in one package.
The solution provides robust security features essential for financial and banking sectors to avoid network and connectivity issues or security breaches.
Dynamic role-based access helps you identify which user is accessing what, with what device, at what time, and the level of access the person has for doing what they are doing.
This new approach is particularly effective for dynamic environments where traditional PAM requires significant effort to detect accounts, onboard accounts, and provide access rights.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| iboss | 4.5% |
| Idira Secure Cloud Access | 0.8% |
| Forcepoint ONE | 2.5% |
| Other | 92.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.
Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.
What are the most important features of Iboss?The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.
Forcepoint ONE offers a comprehensive solution for data protection and security compliance, focusing on cloud applications and role-based access control for safe interactions across platforms.
Forcepoint ONE effectively manages data access, ensuring security and compliance while reducing operational costs and offering a user-friendly interface for easy management. Integrating seamlessly with existing company devices, it provides enhanced Zero Trust Network Access, incident management, and identity verification. Cloud application protection, including Office 365, is maximized through strategic use of Secure Web Gateway (SWG) and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) models, which help guard against unauthorized access, manage secure logins, and filter URL content.
What are the key features of Forcepoint ONE?Organizations use Forcepoint ONE primarily for ensuring compliance and secure data management in environments like healthcare and corporate sectors. By safeguarding sensitive information like PHI and utilizing robust role-based access control, users can enhance security measures significantly. Additionally, the system's ability to manage secure exchanges and protect resources underlines its relevance in regulated industries.
CyberArk Secure Cloud Access improves security with its dynamic role-based access and efficient management of private keys, minimizing security risks and enhancing user experience in demanding cloud environments.
CyberArk Secure Cloud Access is designed for lightweight deployment, offering high availability and robust security features. Its seamless integration with SIEM enhances user experience, while private key management reduces manual entry dependency. Comprehensive audit trails and visibility facilitate monitoring and risk reduction in CI/CD environments. Despite its robust capabilities, on-premises deployments can be complex, requiring improvements in customization and real-time monitoring features. Expanding availability across various clouds, especially in compliance-focused regions like India, is necessary to address AI challenges and hybrid multicloud needs.
What are the Key Features of CyberArk Secure Cloud Access?
What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?
CyberArk Secure Cloud Access is widely implemented in industries requiring robust privileged access management, governance, and auditing. It provides valuable insights into access details and actions, aiding organizations in managing access within secure environments. With extensive use in identity management across major cloud platforms, it supports tracking changes and permissions, crucial for cybersecurity operations in complex network and cloud infrastructures.
We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.