FlutterFlow vs QuickBase comparison

FlutterFlow and Quickbase are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quickbase is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. FlutterFlow holds a 1.5% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Quickbase’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

1,154 Views
785 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

2,015 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

QuickBase and FlutterFlow compete in application development. QuickBase seems to have the upper hand in support and pricing, while FlutterFlow wins on features, justifying its higher price for many users.

Features: Users value QuickBase for its flexibility, integration capabilities, and business process automation. QuickBase is favored for business-centric features. FlutterFlow stands out with ease of use, rapid prototyping, and visual development tools, making it highly valued for mobile app creation.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase users suggest enhancements in customization options, interface modernity, and advanced tracking. FlutterFlow users recommend improved performance, adding backend services, and richer analytics. QuickBase focuses on customization, while FlutterFlow aims at performance enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. FlutterFlow receives accolades for intuitive deployment but mixed reviews on customer support. QuickBase offers strong support and smooth deployment, while FlutterFlow is easy to deploy but needs better support services.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase users find pricing reasonable with good ROI due to efficient business processes. FlutterFlow users acknowledge higher costs but see the feature set as justifying the investment, leading to good ROI for app development. QuickBase is seen as cost-effective, while FlutterFlow is considered a valuable investment for its rich feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QuickBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QuickBase	2.1%
FlutterFlow	1.5%
Other	96.4%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Bibhu Sahu

Senior VP Technology at HDFC Bank

Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP

We integrate FlutterFlow into our app development process by first developing the code using the enterprise ID. Once the code is ready, we preview it and then download it. We have built a CI process where the code, once pushed to the gate, is processed by CI actions to generate the appropriate output, whether it is an IPA or APK file. While FlutterFlow currently focuses on website development, we write the code in a way that allows us to adapt it for mobile apps as well. We maintain a unified codebase for all three platforms, ensuring consistency and efficiency in our development workflow. FlutterFlow accelerated my development timeline on a project where I needed a simple website with basic navigation and form submissions. While it lacks advanced design pattern options and some features are still maturing, it simplifies integration and speeds up development. FlutterFlow's UI design capabilities have significantly impacted my app development by allowing me to communicate marketing concepts more effectively through visual flow. Every feature in FlutterFlow, from screen design to integrations, has been valuable for my development efforts. However, having better support for multiple design patterns and ensuring compatibility with custom changes would greatly improve the development experience. Overall, I would rate FlutterFlow as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

RahulSharma15

Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Empowers content management and application creation without SQL

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."

"Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."

"The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier."

"It has superb ease of use and no code needed to create and build apps and databases."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."

"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."

"They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time."

"The dashboard is not organized."

"I would like the product to add more working processes."

"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."

"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Media Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

University

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

See all answers

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 69% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 14% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 3% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 8% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

November 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

December 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

December 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.