FlutterFlow vs QuickBase comparison

FlutterFlow and Quickbase are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quickbase is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. FlutterFlow holds a 2.4% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Quickbase’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

514 Views
449 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

1,891 Views
870 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

QuickBase and FlutterFlow compete in application development. QuickBase seems to have the upper hand in support and pricing, while FlutterFlow wins on features, justifying its higher price for many users.

Features: Users value QuickBase for its flexibility, integration capabilities, and business process automation. QuickBase is favored for business-centric features. FlutterFlow stands out with ease of use, rapid prototyping, and visual development tools, making it highly valued for mobile app creation.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase users suggest enhancements in customization options, interface modernity, and advanced tracking. FlutterFlow users recommend improved performance, adding backend services, and richer analytics. QuickBase focuses on customization, while FlutterFlow aims at performance enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. FlutterFlow receives accolades for intuitive deployment but mixed reviews on customer support. QuickBase offers strong support and smooth deployment, while FlutterFlow is easy to deploy but needs better support services.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase users find pricing reasonable with good ROI due to efficient business processes. FlutterFlow users acknowledge higher costs but see the feature set as justifying the investment, leading to good ROI for app development. QuickBase is seen as cost-effective, while FlutterFlow is considered a valuable investment for its rich feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QuickBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 2.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Creates versatile applications seamlessly across platforms

I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter. It is easy to use when you understand the code, know how to use Docs, and understand the components of Flutter. It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments. Additionally, it works for both PC and iOS devices.

Read full review

Daniel Ream

Director of Estimating at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable

I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."

"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."

"I run my own business and the solution allows me to invoice and pay for additional resources. It has helped me in terms of invoicing, quoting, and doing recruitment measures."

"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."

"The product is easy to use."

"We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared."

"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."

"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."

"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."

"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."

"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."

"Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system."

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Media Company

Educational Organization

76%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 42% of the time

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 26% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 30% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 22% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 14% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs QuickBase

Compared 6% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

March 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

April 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

April 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. QuickBase report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.