We performed a comparison between FireEye Helix and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The product offers very strong automation. Our cyber security analysts don't have to correlate the information to detect problems. They only need to analyze problems that have been identified by the platform."
"It is kind of simple and very easily deployable. You can start working with it very fast."
"The most valuable features include predefined use cases and threatening states."
"I like that it's easy. It's got the protection set up, and we can see whatever is required. We write our own rules and the rules that we can input. I think it is good."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"It should have more cloud connectors. It could also be cheaper."
"Sometimes the rules are disabled by FireEye, and we basically get it after the patch. I think there needs to be a better way of creating the application rules. I would like to see better pricing for our licensing."
"The graphical user interface could be improved. It's not easy to handle and it's not easy for a customer or end-user to learn how to manage the solution."
"Integrations could be improved, and the dashboard could be a little better."
"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."
"The product needs a bit more development."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
FireEye Helix is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 4 reviews while IBM Resilient is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 4 reviews. FireEye Helix is rated 8.6, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of FireEye Helix writes "Easy to set up with strong automation and few false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". FireEye Helix is most compared with Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, McAfee ESM, IBM QRadar and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Rapid7 InsightConnect. See our FireEye Helix vs. IBM Resilient report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
