F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs Sucuri comparison

F5 and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. F5 is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3, while Sucuri Security is ranked #36. F5 holds a 0.4% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

F5 Rules for AWS WAF

Read 10 F5 Rules for AWS WAF reviews

1,624 Views
520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

2,483 Views
1,837 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 Rules for AWS WAF

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Rules for AWS WAF and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Rules for AWS WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Rules Management (3rd)

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (25th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Rules for AWS WAF is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 Rules for AWS WAF	0.4%
Sucuri	1.6%
Other	98.0%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Vibin Thomas

Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems

Advanced protection has reduced web attacks and improves application performance and operations

One area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved is in simplifying the tuning process. While F5 Rules for AWS WAF is powerful, fine-tuning it to match specific application behavior can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams without deep WAF expertise. Another improvement could be enhanced visibility and reporting. Although AWS WAF provides logs, having more intuitive and built-in dashboards or clearer categorization of rule triggers would make it easier to quickly identify and analyze attack patterns. Additionally, expanding the capabilities around bot management and behavior analysis would be beneficial compared to some dedicated bot management solutions. More advanced detection techniques could further strengthen the protection against sophisticated automated traffic. Finally, providing more predefined templates or best practice recommendations for different application types would help speed up the deployment and reduce the initial configuration effort.

Read full review

Jagobandhu Some

Hardware Engineer at Ministry of Defense

A cost-effective choice for website security and informative support with issues related to CDN quality

One area where they could improve is in providing real-time support options because now you need to open a support ticket and wait for their response. It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance. I have found their Content Delivery Network service to be lacking in quality, and it could certainly be enhanced to provide better performance. I would also like to see improvements in the deployment process, as it currently takes more time than desirable. Another significant concern is that their service when your website is down, turns it into a static site. This means that if customers try to visit your site during downtime, they will see old content from the static site, which is not ideal. The CDN and tracking services are areas that need improvement, as well as addressing their bandwidth limitations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted our organization for security through the implementation of traffic rules in our application."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF is a strong, enterprise-focused solution for organizations that need robust web application security, centralized policy management, and better visibility into application layer threats within AWS environments."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF should be highly recommended for AI applications, as security is a major concern, and using F5 helps prevent security issues and stabilizes organizations and applications."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF's OWASP protection and bot protection have reduced attacks on my applications by 72 to 90%."

"After implementing F5 Rules for AWS WAF, we observed a reduction of approximately 60 to 70% in web application security incidents reaching our application team, particularly blocking common threats like bot traffic and SQL injections without impacting our downstream systems."

"Overall, the combination of reduced manual effort, improved security posture, and better application performance has delivered a strong return on investment."

"I advise anyone looking for a great tool to secure their public-facing applications to start using F5 Rules for AWS WAF."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF is definitely recommended. It is a good tool for anyone to try and see if it matches their use case, and it is something that an organization can really benefit from."

More F5 Rules for AWS WAF pros

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"For people who own a personal website, this solution is worth trying out since their security solution is somewhat full-fledged."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"Rather than locate some things manually, the Sucuri plugin scans and allows us to pinpoint whether there is malware or some problem in the site."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

Cons

"One area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved is in simplifying the tuning process."

"It's too early to talk about a return on investment with F5 Rules for AWS WAF."

"There are potential false positives in F5 Rules for AWS WAF that sometimes require tuning."

"I think F5 Rules for AWS WAF could be improved mainly around visibility, specifically having more actionable recommendations for false positives."

"From an improvement standpoint, one area where F5 Rules for AWS WAF could improve is in simplifying policy management and making advanced configurations more intuitive, especially for teams that are newer to enterprise WAF technologies."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF could be improved with deeper integration with Infrastructure as Code tools like Terraform for simplification, as well as more AI-driven recommendations for rules tuning to reduce false positives and better dashboards for visibility at the CXO level."

"An area for improvement I see is that while everything is in good shape, I demand continuous improvisation of these rule sets."

"F5 Rules for AWS WAF can be improved by simplifying the tuning process to reduce false positives and providing more built-in dashboards for better visibility and further customization."

More F5 Rules for AWS WAF cons

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

33%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Rules for AWS WAF?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for F5 Rules for AWS WAF was good with purchasing and the setup cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Rules for AWS WAF?

The additional costs for F5 Rules for AWS WAF are quite high, as F5 managed rules require a separate subscription on top of the standard AWS WAF charges; it would be great if it would be pre-integr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 Rules for AWS WAF?

F5 Rules for AWS WAF manages the security rule set by applying the rules and setting the block directly in AWS WAF to provide advanced protection against web application attacks, bots, threats, and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

No data available

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 13% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 Rules for AWS WAF

August 2026

Download F5 Rules for AWS WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

July 2026

Download Sucuri product report

Overview

F5 Rules for AWS WAF provides advanced web application protection tailored to secure applications hosted on AWS, offering dynamic defenses against evolving threats.

This solution offers a robust set of rules designed to enhance AWS WAF capabilities, delivering specialized protections against complex web threats. F5 Rules dynamically guard against emerging vulnerabilities, ensuring comprehensive threat mitigation. It's crafted to integrate seamlessly with AWS environments, making it fast and easy to deploy, manage, and scale as compared with legacy alternatives, providing users a manageable and comprehensive security layer for their applications.

What are the key features of F5 Rules for AWS WAF?

Automatic Updates: Regularly refreshes its defenses to address the latest threats.
Pre-built Rules: Offers a library of pre-configured rules that are easy to deploy.
Scalable Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to changing web traffic conditions.

What ROI should users expect from F5 Rules for AWS WAF?

Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk exposure with specialized threat intelligence.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by reducing the need for manual threat management.
Time Savings: Streamlines deployment and maintenance with quick setup and automated updates.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, F5 Rules have been implemented to protect sensitive data and online transactions. This helps ensure compliance with industry regulations while maintaining performance and uptime for web applications.

Sucuri offers comprehensive website security solutions with features like malware detection, notification plugins, and simplified risk management via collaboration with website providers.

Sucuri specializes in website protection by combining malware detection, IP monitoring, and domain scanning to identify threats such as phishing. Although it eases security workloads and streamlines setup, some users highlight areas for enhancement, including improved .NET support and real-time customer support options. Despite needing upgrades in certain aspects like PCI testing and DDoS protection, its strengths lie in securing WordPress sites and managing web application firewalls effectively.

What are Sucuri's Key Features?

Malware Detection: Identifies and alerts users of website infections efficiently.
IP Monitoring: Provides analytics and visualization for tracking IP requests.
Domain Scanning: Detects malware and phishing across domain names.
Collaboration with Providers: Works with website providers for risk mitigation.
Website Security Simplification: Streamlines security processes with minimum effort.

What Benefits or ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Security Workload: Automation minimizes the need for constant manual monitoring.
Enhanced Threat Identification: Proactive notifications help in swift risk management.
Streamlined Setup: Easy deployment reduces implementation time.
Trust in Risk Updates: Reliable backend notifications ensure timely threat awareness.

In specific industries, Sucuri is implemented to safeguard WordPress environments and manage traffic using web application firewalls. Organizations often utilize its IP blocking and geolocation features for enhanced website protection, benefiting from its malware cleanup capabilities in various sectors.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri

August 2026

Free Report: F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 Rules for AWS WAF vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.