

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, iboss and others in Internet Security.
Incident troubleshooting time reduced by 35 to 45 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly used instead of correlating multiple cloud and firewall logs.
Overall, this has improved team productivity, allowing the same team to handle more deployments without increasing headcount.
Now, with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, we do it in about thirty seconds, which shows significant time saved.
I observed around 35 to 45% reduction in malicious application layer traffic reaching the origin, which helped protect the backend systems and reduce risk exposure.
One measurable benefit was a reduction in manual effort required for managing and tuning web application protection policies because the managed rule capabilities and centralized visibility simplified the day-to-day operations.
I did see a return on my investment with F5 Rules for AWS WAF because I was able to detect attacks earlier, and because of this, my resources were not scaling continuously, thus saving costs on resources.
In more complex scenarios such as routing or policy tuning, support provided best practices and recommendations, which made the implementation smoother.
We reached out to customer support three weeks back due to an issue where Zscaler got stuck, and they identified and solved the problem within 45 minutes, which is exceptional.
The support team is knowledgeable and responsive, especially for standard issues.
They clearly explained what the best options are based on my use case, which helped us shortlist what is required.
The support team generally demonstrates strong technical knowledge around application security and traffic management, along with the AWS integrations.
For critical issues, the response time is quite good, and the support teams are knowledgeable in handling rule tuning, false positives, and other security-related incidents.
As workloads grow, routing can be updated and traffic can be distributed across multiple connectors without major architecture changes.
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is highly scalable since it is built on cloud-native architecture and can support organizations ranging from small businesses to large enterprises without requiring significant infrastructure changes.
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler's scalability is definitely impressive, as it has handled growth and changes in our organization well.
In my experience, F5 Rules for AWS WAF handles traffic spikes and high request volumes efficiently, including during attack scenarios such as bot surges or application layer attacks.
Easily handling traffic spikes and high-volume attacks without any manual intervention.
It supports scaling without significantly affecting application performance even during high traffic periods or sudden spikes in requests.
There have not been any major downtime or critical issues.
Once it is properly configured and deployed, it performs reliably with minimal issues.
It gives us high reliability and the user or the admin can genuinely trust the results that they are getting out of the security platform itself.
F5 Rules for AWS WAF is consistently updated and applied without impacting application availability, and it handles high traffic volumes effectively, even during attack scenarios.
Especially in terms of policy enforcement, traffic inspection, and integration with AWS environments.
Providing comprehensive managed rules coverage and reducing operational overhead compared to the AWS native managed rules.
A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment.
The improvements they can make include a highly resilient, context-aware PAC, proxy auto-configuration engine built directly into the local appliance firmware that can cleanly evaluate complex regular expressions and long hostnames.
If I need to suggest an improvement, it would be to simplify the steep learning curve, as it can be complex for newcomers without prior experience.
To stay safer from a security perspective, continuous improvisation in these security rules is required to ensure we are always up to date with new attacks.
The most useful change for F5 Rules for AWS WAF would be rule-level allow listing and exception management.
Fine-tuning it to match specific application behavior can sometimes be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams without deep WAF expertise.
Overall, while pricing depends on the enterprise agreement, the solution delivers good value considering the visibility, control, and security it provides.
While it may have a higher initial investment than some alternatives, I believe it provides good value because of its scalability, cloud-native architecture, centralized management, and strong security capabilities.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is definitely competitive.
It has competitive pricing.
There is no significant setup cost involved, as it is a managed service that can be quickly integrated into the existing AWS WAF configuration without additional infrastructure.
F5 Rules for AWS WAF is not very costly and is reasonable, with enterprises being able to afford the cost.
It also provides Layer 4 routed bypass for TCP, UDP, and ICMP traffic, enabling granular traffic control that streamlines our services working with Zscaler.
Previously, if a particular task was taking 10 minutes, now it is significantly reduced to two to three minutes only.
I find the strong zero-trust approach for cloud workloads to be the most valuable day-to-day because Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is designed around zero-trust connectivity, not legacy network extension.
Now, looking at these rule sets, they ensure that our origin or our application content and code, as well as the application itself or its API, are secure enough, always.
F5 Rules for AWS WAF rule sets are highly effective in detecting and mitigating OWASP Top 10 attacks such as SQL injection, XSS, and command injection, which significantly strengthens application security.
Using F5 Rules for AWS WAF has positively impacted my organization by making our AI-integrated application more secure from bot attacks, restricted size bodies, automated rate blocking for DDoS, and managed rules, especially as security has become a common concern across the industry.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler | 0.8% |
| Zscaler Internet Access | 27.2% |
| Cisco Umbrella | 27.0% |
| Other | 45.0% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| F5 Rules for AWS WAF | 2.0% |
| Pega Platform | 26.0% |
| FICO Blaze Advisor | 24.8% |
| Other | 47.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is designed to enhance security by blocking malicious content and providing agentless integration with cloud workloads. It simplifies policy management and improves scalability, making it a critical tool for securing cloud environments.
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler automates node detection, route selection, and offers centralized visibility, allowing businesses to focus on scaling without traditional firewall constraints. Its high availability routing, SIEM integration, and centralized log management streamline security operations. The solution reduces data leakage risk by enforcing consistent policies across infrastructures. However, areas such as remote user network resolution, configuration complexity, and enhanced routing require improvements for optimal performance.
What are the key features of Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?In industries like banking, Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is vital for compliance support, as it monitors outbound traffic and enhances visibility over workload communication. Organizations benefit from zero-trust protection by inspecting all traffic for threats and accurately enforcing security policies, reducing configuration errors while supporting secure routing for cloud services like AWS.
F5 Rules for AWS WAF provides advanced web application protection tailored to secure applications hosted on AWS, offering dynamic defenses against evolving threats.
This solution offers a robust set of rules designed to enhance AWS WAF capabilities, delivering specialized protections against complex web threats. F5 Rules dynamically guard against emerging vulnerabilities, ensuring comprehensive threat mitigation. It's crafted to integrate seamlessly with AWS environments, making it fast and easy to deploy, manage, and scale as compared with legacy alternatives, providing users a manageable and comprehensive security layer for their applications.
What are the key features of F5 Rules for AWS WAF?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, F5 Rules have been implemented to protect sensitive data and online transactions. This helps ensure compliance with industry regulations while maintaining performance and uptime for web applications.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.