F5 BIG-IQ vs Temporal comparison

F5 and Temporal Technologies are both solutions in the Process Automation category. F5 is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.5, while Temporal Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. F5 holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to Temporal Technologies’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Temporal Technologies users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IQ

Read 15 F5 BIG-IQ reviews

564 Views
564 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Temporal

Read 18 Temporal reviews

2,773 Views
2,773 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Temporal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

F5 BIG-IQ and Temporal compete in infrastructure management and workflow orchestration. F5 BIG-IQ appears to have the upper hand in deployment and support, while Temporal shines with its advanced features.

Features: F5 BIG-IQ offers centralized management, security intelligence, and superior automation capabilities. Temporal provides robust workflow automation, scalability, and resilience for complex applications.

Room for Improvement: F5 BIG-IQ could enhance its user interface and integrate more seamlessly with third-party systems. Temporal may improve on reducing resource consumption, offer more intuitive UI elements, and expand compatibility with additional development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IQ is user-friendly with streamlined deployment and robust support for networking environments. Temporal requires more technical expertise for its microservices architecture but is backed by comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IQ has moderate setup costs and delivers fast ROI by optimizing network performance. Temporal may have higher upfront costs due to its features but provides significant ROI by streamlining complex workflows efficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

29th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Temporal

Ranking in Process Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 5.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Temporal	5.9%
F5 BIG-IQ	0.8%
Other	93.3%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Bikale Kassu

Manager for Implementation and Administration at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has faced challenges with visibility and technical support but allows centralized management of multiple sites

The configuration part is complex for F5 BIG-IQ. The simplicity and visibility part needs improvement. The dashboard, especially the analytics part, needs to be more simple and presentable. For the security part, it is difficult to present to our management, so we have to capture it and prepare manual reporting options rather than getting them directly from the system. The automation part in F5 BIG-IQ is limited; we are still using it only for load balancing for some services. We haven't integrated it with our Accesso or implemented any automation options. The setup process for F5 BIG-IQ would rate a five out of ten.

Read full review

ManibabuPippalla

Founder & CEO at Lanzar

Automation streamlines operations and improves time and cost efficiency

My overall experience with Temporal is rated between 8 to 9, mainly due to a learning curve that only senior developers can navigate effectively, which makes it a bit challenging for junior developers. We don't have any instances of on-premise, so I cannot comment on that because we are a first company, with all services deployed on cloud infrastructure. Most of the integration is through RPC or APIs, ensuring all our systems are in cohesion. We do state persistence to a Postgres instance, and we have modified it to our use case with better indexing. And for fault tolerance, we built a queue and an alerting mechanism that notifies us if any workflows fail after specific failure points so we can act upon it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Temporal an 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service is great."

"The reporting feature is quite good."

"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."

"The product is excellent."

"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."

"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."

"Scalability: To move from larger boxes to smaller boxes, along with virtualization. So, we are not locked into a particular size."

"The most valuable features are load balancing and WAF."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

"The ROI is apparent in terms of business case automation; previously, a bunch of people filled in data in NetSuite or managed stocks between warehouses and Amazon, but now everything is automated, saving time."

"When some jobs take a lot of time and fail midway, the solution’s retry feature automatically causes them to retry."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to fix things quickly."

"What I like best about the tool is that it's easy to install, especially since it uses JavaScript. It's also easy to set up with Docker, and the documentation is easy to understand."

"Temporal focus on developers rather than business users."

"The most valuable thing about Temporal is that we can create multiple and child workflows. We can segregate work as we want, which is good for work organization. It's also easy to maintain. We're trying to generate and fill PDF forms with custom data, including digital signatures. We call AWS and do all activities through Temporal, like calling and saving data in buckets. We do this because we have a lot of load, with multiple users requesting data. We have two types of users: admin and customer. The admin creates forms, and employees or customers fill them out. When admin gets a form, it's stored in Temporal."

"Temporal allows retryability for different workflows whenever they fail. It helps ensure idempotence and that things get done."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to retry from an interrupted state."

More Temporal pros

Cons

"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."

"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."

"A bug caused me to lose all the configuration."

"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."

"There are a lot of scripts available on the internet for people who know how to use them, but with a graphical interface, it would be easier for new users."

"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."

"From a hands-on experience perspective, more resources should be available on the Internet, like labs and lab preparations."

"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

"While the tool can be a bit daunting initially, especially if you're not used to async programming models, it's generally a pleasure. There's always room for improvement, though. I've noticed some limitations with the .NET SDK regarding dynamic workflows, but this might have been improved in recent versions. Overall, I think Temporal could be more open about implementing features in a more—.NET-friendly way, especially in how you add workers and clients."

"One area where I think Temporal could improve is its dashboard, particularly in event tracking. Currently, the dashboard doesn't show a time-based view of events, meaning it doesn't display when an event started or went through the retry process. If this feature could be added in a future release, it would significantly enhance monitoring capabilities. Other than that, Temporal's overall performance is quite impressive, and we're confident we can migrate to the Temporal workflow."

"One area for the product improvement is the learning curve."

"We previously faced issues with the solution's patch system."

"Temporal lacks many resources, like YouTube videos, which users can use to learn or refer to if they get stuck with the solution."

"Configuring workflows can be improved —the solution could offer more options, but it's not a must-have."

"There are areas where Temporal could improve. For instance, calling multiple microservices with Temporal introduces latency due to workflow registration and analytics overhead."

"I don't like the limitations on data flow, particularly the difficulty of passing large amounts of data between different activities."

More Temporal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

"Temporal is a free, open-source tool."

"The savings weren't as big as we initially expected, but they were pretty great from a developer's perspective."

"Temporal is open-source and free to use, which is great. We didn't have to pay for any premium features."

"The tool is open source under the MIT license, so there are no hidden fees. You can freely use everything on their GitHub and Docker images."

"It is worth the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IQ?

F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

From the pricing perspective, F5 BIG-IQ rates an eight out of ten as it's reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?

In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temporal?

The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Temporal?

The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 59% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 41% of the time

More F5 BIG-IQ Competitors

Camunda vs Temporal

Compared 42% of the time

Flowable vs Temporal

Compared 14% of the time

Orkes vs Temporal

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temporal

Compared 7% of the time

Control-M vs Temporal

Compared 4% of the time

More Temporal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ

January 2026

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Temporal

January 2026

Download Temporal product report

Overview

F5® BIG-IQ® Centralized Management provides a unified point of visibility and control for the entire F5 portfolio, ensuring administrators remain aware on the pulse of F5 devices, modules, and licenses and enabling them to deliver optimal application availability, performance, and security.

BIG-IQ manages policies,licenses, SSL certificates, BIG-IP images, and configurations for F5 appliances and for the following BIG-IP moduals across hardware and virtual editions:

BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager™ (LTM)
F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall™ (WAF)
BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager™ (AFM)
F5 SSL Orchestrator®
F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender®
BIG-IP Access Policy Manager® (APM)
F5 Secure Web Gateway Services
BIG-IP DNS

Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.

Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.

What are Temporal's key features?

Automation and Efficient Management: Automatically handles workflows without manual intervention.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance: Features built-in retry policies for increased reliability.
Integration: Supports various programming languages, easing development.
Distributed Transactions: Simplifies complex transaction handling with reduced boilerplate code.
Durable Execution: Ensures long-running workflows are reliably managed.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Scalability and Reliability: Enhances IT environments through robust workflow management.
Ease of Integration: Supports seamless multi-platform automation.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces need for extensive coding, streamlining processes.
Durability and Fault Tolerance: Provides reliable asynchronous operations.

Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.

Temporal Technologies

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IQ vs. Temporal report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.