ActiveBatch by Redwood vs F5 BIG-IQ comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and F5 are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while F5 is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.7. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to F5’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of F5 users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,093 Views
523 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Read 14 F5 BIG-IQ reviews

279 Views
276 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

F5 BIG-IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

F5 BIG-IQ and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in IT infrastructure management and workload automation. ActiveBatch appears to have the upper hand for organizations prioritizing process automation and integration features.

Features: F5 BIG-IQ focuses on centralized management of BIG-IP devices, advanced analytics, and strong security enhancements. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers comprehensive workload automation, cross-platform support, and seamless integration with third-party applications.

Room for Improvement: F5 BIG-IQ could improve its integration capabilities with non-network infrastructure and streamline its deployment process. ActiveBatch by Redwood could enhance its user interface for beginners and expand documentation for customization features, and reduce complexity in some advanced automation configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ActiveBatch by Redwood is known for its streamlined deployment and supportive onboarding. It offers continuous customer support. F5 BIG-IQ requires a thorough understanding of network environments, which can be complex, but provides comprehensive deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IQ incurs significant initial setup costs with a focus on network management but offers substantial ROI. ActiveBatch has competitive setup costs and offers significant ROI through operational efficiency and automation, showcasing a favorable cost-benefit for automation needs.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Workload Automation (9th)

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Ravindra-Mali

Sr. Cybersecurity Specialist at Royal Technology Solutions LLC

Key features like SSL uploading strengthen file handling

From the study material point of view, there are multiple certifications available. The challenge is there is hardly any study material available that can be referred to or used as a study material. Of course, from the knowledge perspective, multiple courses and details are available. However, from a hands-on experience perspective, more resources should be available on the Internet, like labs and lab preparations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ActiveBatch's Self-Service Portal allows our business units to run and monitor their own workloads. They can simply run and review the logs, but they can't modify them. It increases their productivity because they are able to take care of things on their own. It saves us time from having to rerun the scripts, because the business units can just go ahead and log in and and rerun it themselves."

"Approximately ~20 hours of manual effort have been reduced to ~5 hours with the help of ActiveBatch."

"For developers, it is easy to orchestrate the workflows and the integration has been very easy."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs."

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc."

"There are hundreds of pre-built steps."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."

"The product is excellent."

"The reporting feature is quite good."

"Features like AFM, the gateway, and Global DNS are the coolest features that save work for us."

"The customer service is great."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP."

"F5 BIG-IQ has always provided us with great support."

"The best aspect of the solution is that we can have everything integrated with a rather large capacity in order to personalize and configure specific rules."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

Cons

"It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"They should offer pricing that is more affordable."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"I have faced struggles to understand, set up the tool, and implement it in my early days as a new user."

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"ActiveBatch is a little complex."

"There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."

"A bug caused me to lose all the configuration."

"From a hands-on experience perspective, more resources should be available on the Internet, like labs and lab preparations."

"I had trouble with high availability deployment in my environment."

"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."

"F5 BIG-IQ should improve by being a complete certificate management solution because currently, it is only for Venafi. Other automation platforms, should be added."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a complex solution, and it cannot manage everything related to BIG-IPs."

"Sometimes the solution does not work."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IQ?

F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

The product is really good with no significant downsides. However, better and simpler integration with ACI could improve the product.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 17% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

August 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ

August 2025

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

F5® BIG-IQ® Centralized Management provides a unified point of visibility and control for the entire F5 portfolio, ensuring administrators remain aware on the pulse of F5 devices, modules, and licenses and enabling them to deliver optimal application availability, performance, and security.

BIG-IQ manages policies,licenses, SSL certificates, BIG-IP images, and configurations for F5 appliances and for the following BIG-IP moduals across hardware and virtual editions:

BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager™ (LTM)
F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall™ (WAF)
BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager™ (AFM)
F5 SSL Orchestrator®
F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender®
BIG-IP Access Policy Manager® (APM)
F5 Secure Web Gateway Services
BIG-IP DNS

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ

July 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. F5 BIG-IQ report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.