F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs Radware Alteon comparison

F5 and Radware are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. F5 is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8, while Radware is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9. F5 holds a 0.5% mindshare in ADC, compared to Radware’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Radware users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Read 7 F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition reviews

1,600 Views
80 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Radware Alteon

Read 49 Radware Alteon reviews

3,080 Views
1,817 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Radware Alteon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2025

Radware Alteon and F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition compete in the application delivery controller market. Radware Alteon impresses with its superior application delivery features, while F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is preferred for its advanced web application firewall capabilities, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Radware Alteon offers SSL-TLS acceleration, integrated application protection, and customization options for load balancing. F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition provides advanced web application firewall, SSL offloading, and consistent performance features.

Room for Improvement: Radware Alteon could enhance automation, live traffic monitoring, and reporting interface, and requires better configuration support. It also suffers from false positives. F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition needs improvements in resource demand, complex configurations, and microservices support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Alteon is flexible and easy to deploy across different environments and is supported by responsive customer service. F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition mainly supports on-premises and private cloud deployments with robust, though sometimes delayed, technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Radware Alteon offers competitive pricing and flexible licensing with a strong ROI from improved stability and availability. F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is more expensive but valued for its advanced features, offering a beneficial investment over time.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Radware Alteon

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is 0.5%. The mindshare of Radware Alteon is 4.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Radware Alteon	4.3%
F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition	0.5%
Other	95.2%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2716224

System Administrator at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees

Focuses on securing application access with dependable integration

I do not use the load balancing and traffic management features of F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition. I use other container orchestration platforms, but they are not relevant to F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition. I have utilized F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition's ability to integrate with cloud platforms including AWS, Azure, GCP, and Salesforce. I have no idea how this integration has helped my organization manage hybrid or multi-cloud environments. The seamless integration of F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition with existing F5 technologies is not important to me as I do not use other technologies from F5. Financially, we require F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition because we need the product. We don't have anything else that performs the same functions, so we use it without trying alternatives. I just use and manage F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition, though I didn't handle its deployment. I would recommend F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition as a solution to others. I would rate F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition an eight out of ten overall.

Read full review

reviewer2663061

Project Manager at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees

Manages SSL load balancing and offload efficiently while providing excellent support

The most valuable feature is the support from the engineering team. They quickly resolved a VLAN issue that other vendors could not. The product allows us to manage multiple networks and VLANs into a single box and add numerous web services and farms efficiently. The SSL management and integration capabilities are also standout features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The advanced web application firewall protection and SSL offloading capabilities of F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition have been utilized in my organization; these features are contributing to our application security and compliance posture."

"It's easy to use, and they have good support."

"The tool's investment is less than a physical device."

"I have a specific issue with the network interface connector, the NIC. We're limited to a maximum of two NICs in a virtualized environment. It's a limitation of the tool."

"The features that I like include LTM and Global Traffic Manager (GTM)."

"The integration capabilities of the product are easy to use, and there is no complexity involved in it."

"It has DoS layer 7 protection, which not many vendors have."

"It saves us a lot of work in terms of management since it has tasks already defined automatically. That enables us to better administer our services. It is very dynamic and easy to administer."

"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."

"The most valuable aspect is the ability to customize the types of load-balancing scenarios needed for customized applications. Some of the load balancers on the market today are strictly out-of-hand load balancers for SSL or HTTP. Radware Alteon is most useful for customizing in-house applications based on ports and protocols."

"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."

"The integrated application protection provided by Alteon is very good. It really helps to avoid false positives in some cases. It provides important granularity to avoid a situation in which security or cybersecurity scenarios escape us."

"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."

"I like how easy it is to create policies in Alteon. Debugging and SSL offloading are also simple, and the global load-balancing part is good. Load-balancing and SSL offloading are the two features that ensure your virtual services work perfectly."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More Radware Alteon pros

Cons

"It's expensive and could be cheaper."

"BIG-IP could improve in supporting microservices, for example, in Docker and Kubernetes environments."

"The tool has limitations with respect to code and RAM."

"F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is a heavy system that needs a lot of CPU, memory, and hard disk."

"I have a specific issue with the network interface connector, the NIC. We're limited to a maximum of two NICs in a virtualized environment. It's a limitation of the tool."

"On-the-go upgrades are an option that the tool currently lacks, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The service could be improved by better customer support."

"Radware Alteon could improve the troubleshooting from the command line interface, they could do a better job making it easier."

"We don't integrate anything with it because most things don't integrate with Radware. If it were F5, we could integrate it. We can integrate F5 with practically anything that integrates with a load balancer, but that's not the case with Alteon."

"Support is an area that needs improvement."

"Could have more customizations on the dashboard."

"Alteon's user interface could be improved. F5's user interface is more user-friendly than Radware's, but Radware's hardware performs better."

"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."

"Radware should work on the vulnerabilities part. There are third-party security solutions that do the security vulnerability assessment (VA). The assessment part needs to be worked on and improved. There should be more solutions. If any issue comes up and if any vulnerability is reported, the Radware team should do an R&D on that and work on that. They should give the solution to the customer."

More Radware Alteon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"My company's customers need to make payments for the licensing charges attached to the product. It is an expensive product."

"F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is an expensive solution, but it's worth the price."

"The pricing is standard."

"The pricing is better than the competition. It is getting more pricey as the years go on, as more people are migrating to it, and as the technology gets better."

"I'm content with Alteon's pricing."

"Our government agency opted for Radware Alteon due to its affordability and efficiency. While I can't say precisely how much it costs the organization, the price per device. In India, we always look for affordable products, so I assume Alteon is cost-effective because the government chose it."

"Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."

"We have three-year contract with Radware. It is beneficial to have a longer-term contract because you can obtain more discounts. It seems to be a much cheaper alternative."

"The solution is cost-efficient."

"Alteon's price is excellent compared to other solutions. F5 costs around twice as much. We still have about three years left before this hardware reaches the end of its life. We're migrating to the cloud, and phasing some of this out, but it's nice that they've given us a long window to keep their hardware in place."

"Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive."

More Radware Alteon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition?

The integration capabilities of the product are easy to use, and there is no complexity involved in it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition?

I believe F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition can be improved because the 25 megabits throughput cap is small.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition?

My advice for others looking into using F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition is to be aware of the throughput cap and how complex it can be. I would rate this product a 9 overall.

See all answers

What do you like most about Radware AppWall?

It saves us a lot of work in terms of management since it has tasks already defined automatically. That enables us to better administer our services. It is very dynamic and easy to administer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware AppWall?

There is room for improvement in reducing the number of false positives I receive. We could benefit from more configuration options to avoid these false positives, which can be overwhelming for a s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware AppWall?

We primarily use Radware Alteon for load balancing our servers to ensure there are no bottlenecks and to have resiliency in place.

See all answers

Comparisons

Squid Proxy Cache Server vs F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Compared 22% of the time

F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Compared 20% of the time

SOCKS5 Proxy Server with Web Panel vs F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Compared 17% of the time

UBIKA WAAP Cloud vs F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Compared 17% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

Compared 13% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition Competitors

NetScaler vs Radware Alteon

Compared 16% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware Alteon

Compared 11% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Radware Alteon

Compared 9% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Radware Alteon

Compared 7% of the time

HAProxy vs Radware Alteon

Compared 6% of the time

More Radware Alteon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition

January 2026

Download F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition product report

Buyer's Guide

Radware Alteon

December 2025

Download Radware Alteon product report

Also Known As

No data available

Alteon, Radware AppWall

Overview

When you need to move faster than hardware allows, BIG-IP Virtual Editions (VEs) deliver the application services you need in a more agile and flexible form factor. Get the scalability, security, and automatability BIG-IP products are known for—all in software designed for use in single-, hybrid-, or multi-cloud architectures.

Radware Alteon is an advanced network solution offering exceptional load balancing, SSL offloading, and integrated application protection. Its high performance and user-friendly interface make it ideal for enhancing server capacity and reliability in demanding environments.

Radware Alteon enhances performance with robust load balancing, SSL-TLS acceleration, and comprehensive security features. Its automated threat detection and real-time analytics provide crucial insights and mitigation within high-demand scenarios. Users benefit from seamless server and application traffic management along with web application firewall capabilities, ensuring high availability and compliance with security standards. Scalability is supported through strong hardware and ease of integration, although improvements are needed in cloud service automation and interface simplicity. Challenges include response times and live traffic monitoring, with limited resources in support and documentation. Scalability faces constraints due to throughput limitations.

What are the key features of Radware Alteon?

Load Balancing: Optimizes traffic distribution across servers to enhance performance.
SSL Offloading: Alleviates pressure on servers via SSL-TLS acceleration and certificate management.
Application Protection: Integrates security measures to safeguard applications effectively.
Threat Detection: Automates identification of threats to ensure immediate action.
Real-time Analytics: Provides insights into network performance and security status.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

High Availability: Reliable load management ensures consistent service uptime.
Scalability: Supports network growth efficiently with robust hardware capabilities.
Performance Efficiency: Enhances server functionality by offloading intensive tasks like SSL processing.
Enhanced Security: Protects applications with integrated security features, reducing vulnerabilities.

Radware Alteon is crucial for industries requiring reliable load balancing across multiple servers and applications. It supports inbound and outbound traffic management, focusing on web application protection and data center security. Businesses in telecommunications, finance, and retail utilize its capabilities for server and link balancing, ensuring adherence to strict security standards with seamless functionality across diverse network environments.

Radware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Convergys

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs. Radware Alteon report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.