EY MDR vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ernst & Young and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Ernst & Young is ranked #46, while SentinelOne is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 100% of Ernst & Young users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

EY MDR

Read 1 EY MDR review

961 Views
951 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threa...

Read 34 SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response reviews

10,985 Views
10,216 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

EY MDR

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

EY MDR and SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response are competing cybersecurity solutions. SentinelOne Wayfinder is regarded as superior due to its robust features and perceived value.

Features: EY MDR offers real-time threat monitoring, comprehensive incident response capabilities, and strong pricing benefits. SentinelOne Wayfinder delivers advanced threat detection driven by AI analytics, automated response features, and a focus on automation and advanced analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne Wayfinder features a streamlined deployment process and responsive customer service. EY MDR provides a reliable deployment process and is noted for exceptional customer support.

Pricing and ROI: EY MDR provides competitive pricing with transparent cost structures, offering good ROI. SentinelOne Wayfinder, with potentially higher initial costs, delivers significant returns, justified by its advanced features and automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EY MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threa...

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Security Services (1st)

Featured Reviews

PaulaFadigas

Cyber Security Sales Executive at UOL

A financial planning solution for healthcare that allows you to analyze information for future budgets

It's good because of the benefit it gives in relation to the cost. Other solutions are very expensive to deliver. The solution is a financial planning solution for healthcare, so it helps predict the budget for the next year. A lot of hospitals in Brazil are using Excel and manually calculating these things, so it provides a lot of benefit to clients. This solution is very complete. There are a lot of models for different areas, like oncology, neurology, etc. It shows you the different revenues and profits for each area and allows you to analyze the information in detail. It gives you a good picture of the situation and helps you make a business decision. If the customer has any problems before, during, or after implementation, Ernst & Young help to solve the problem.

Read full review

Md Rafique

it support at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized threat insights have transformed how my team prioritizes and investigates incidents

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response is a strong platform overall, but there are areas for improvement. The reporting and dashboard customization could be more flexible to better suit different teams' needs. In some cases, having more detailed investigation guidance and clearer explanations for complex detections would help analysts, especially those who are new to the platform. I would also like to see broader integration with third-party security tools and additional customization options for alerts and workflows. These improvements would make it even easier to fit the platform into different security environments and operational processes. One area that could be improved is the availability of more advanced training resources and practical documentation. While the platform is user-friendly, having more detailed use case-based guides, troubleshooting examples, and hands-on learning materials would help teams get more value from the solution. Additional best practice documentation around threat investigation, workflow integration, and advanced features would also be helpful. Regular training sessions or updates with learning context would make it easier for administrators and analysts to stay current with new capabilities and improve their overall usage of the platform. One additional area for improvement would be providing more customization options for dashboard, reports, and workflow to better match different organizations and requirements. Enhanced automation options and more detailed guidance for complex threat investigation would also help teams get even more value from the platform. More frequent advanced training materials, real-world use cases, and updated documentation would be beneficial as new features are introduced. Overall, the platform is effective, but continued improvements in customization, learning resources, and investigation capabilities would make it even stronger.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very complete. There are a lot of models for different areas, like oncology, neurology, etc. It shows you the different revenues and profits for each area and allows you to analyze the information in detail."

"The main benefit of this solution is that you have intelligence and functionality behind the solution to predict numbers."

"In our company, we use SentinelOne Vigilance for security purposes. We not only use it to detect viruses but also to monitor any activities on the endpoints so that we can take appropriate measures to mitigate any potential threats."

"We are still working on it, and you can't find a silver bullet solution, however, building your total security with SentinelOne included in your portfolio is a great thing."

"SentinelOne is a comprehensive solution for protecting SOAP-based web services and AWS-based cloud infrastructure."

"SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response is a great tool that detects all suspicious processes, investigates them, takes action, and provides a process tree."

"The main benefits that clients receive from SentinelOne Singularity MDR, from an operational perspective, include ease of deployment, where the installation process across various operating systems and different hardware configurations goes smoothly with minimal impact on end users."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance, which is very important for us in our company."

"SentinelOne has a rollback feature that has helped them gain popularity in the market. No other competitors of the solution including Cisco, Fortinet, or Cortex XDR have this feature. SentinelOne is a kernel-independent solution. We don’t need to check the kernel dependency on the Linux platform. They also commit to a 100 percent recovery from ransomware attacks. The solution has rollback features for ransomware on Windows."

"Most of the next-generation anti-virus products, including SentinelOne Vigilance, have behavior analytics included, and this is the feature I find most valuable in the solution."

More SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response pros

Cons

"The big challenge is when a company doesn't use SAP as ERP. If the company uses other kinds of systems to manage their information, it's a challenge because this product is integrated with SAP."

"The big challenge is when a company doesn't use SAP as ERP."

"SentinelOne Vigilance's integration capabilities with other products can be considered as an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response can improve by addressing lag issues in the UI and dashboard performance, especially during heavy investigations when alerts are high."

"There is always room for continuous improvement for SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response."

"When upgrades are required on the server, you need to almost remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely off the system. We put SentinelOne Vigilance on silence for the monitor mode, but we were having trouble upgrading the server. I had to remove SentinelOne Vigilance completely from the server, but that meant that all the previous logs of attacks I wanted to look at on the server were gone. This is one thing they need to improve, they need better compatibility with the Microsoft Windows service. I should not have to remove the agent completely to upgrade the service."

"SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response is a strong solution, but it could be enhanced with more customizable dashboards and reporting, deeper integrations, third-party security rules, and additional automation options for incident response workflow."

"SentinelOne Vigilance doesn't have a direct connection with MSPs."

"The integration with Microsoft 365 for SentinelOne Singularity MDR isn't quite as effective as with Field Effect."

"There's no problem with how this product works, but the toughest challenge that customers find is with its deployment and tuning. Getting it tuned properly takes some time. You can deploy it with just about anything, but it's always a challenge."

More SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is good in relation to the benefit."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten since it is really expensive, but it is well worth what my company gets."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten since it is a very highly-priced solution."

"SentinelOne Vigilance is priced in a normal range."

"The solution’s pricing is very reasonable."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of connected devices and whether you purchase additional services."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is slightly cheaper than other alternatives. It's not just about licensing costs; because we already have it implemented, we can save money on deployment and initial setup. Additionally, SentinelOne Vigilance is slightly cheaper in licensing, maybe around 10-15 percent cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Vigilance?

The pricing, licensing, and setup costs in general are quite affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Vigilance?

Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once. The solution is fully scalable, although the only poi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SentinelOne Vigilance?

Speaking about the use cases for SentinelOne Vigilance, people are usually using these products for protecting their PCs to have a clean environment.

See all answers

Comparisons

Secureworks Taegis Managed XDR / MDR vs EY MDR

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs EY MDR

Compared 18% of the time

Difenda Shield vs EY MDR

Compared 18% of the time

CSIS MDR vs EY MDR

Compared 15% of the time

LevelBlue Managed Detection and Response vs EY MDR

Compared 8% of the time

More EY MDR Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Secureworks Taegis Managed XDR / MDR vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response vs SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

September 2026

Download EY MDR product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response

September 2026

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response report

Download SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

EY Managed Detection and Response

SentinelOne WatchTower, SentinelOne Wayfinder Managed Detection & Response

Overview

EY MDR is a comprehensive solution designed for managing data risks, offering capabilities that address complex compliance challenges and provide strategic insights for enterprises.

EY MDR transforms data risk management by leveraging advanced analytics and automation to deliver actionable insights. It aids companies in navigating compliance requirements efficiently and enhancing decision-making processes across departments. Its robust ecosystem supports integration with existing systems, ensuring seamless operation and productivity.

What are the essential features of EY MDR?

Advanced Analytics: Provides data-driven insights for informed decision-making.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency and reducing errors.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing enterprise systems.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers tailored views to meet specific business requirements.
Risk Assessment Tools: Identifies and mitigates potential data risks proactively.

What should users look for in reviews when evaluating EY MDR?

Improved Compliance: Helps meet data protection standards effectively.
Enhanced Decision Making: Delivers precise insights for strategic planning.
Cost Efficiency: Automation and analytics reduce operational costs.
Scalability: Supports growth with scalable infrastructure.
User Satisfaction: Consistent positive feedback on functionality and support.

EY MDR is implemented across industries from finance to healthcare, each benefiting from tailored risk management strategies. Financial firms appreciate its compliance aid, while healthcare organizations value its data protection capabilities. The strategic, industry-specific insights provided ensure relevance and effectiveness.

Ernst & Young

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response Services enhance cybersecurity with advanced threat detection and incident response capabilities, offering robust protection against cyber threats for security-savvy organizations.

SentinelOne Wayfinder is designed for institutions that require sophisticated threat management solutions. It provides real-time detection, response automation, and proactive threat hunting, allowing enterprises to stay ahead of malicious threats. Its deployment can significantly enhance a company's security posture by integrating cutting-edge technologies that focus on identifying threats at various stages of the kill chain. With the ability to scale and adapt to specific security requirements, SentinelOne Wayfinder is ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive coverage against potential cyber attacks.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Wayfinder?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Identifies and responds to threats in real-time, minimizing potential damage.
Automated Incident Response: Automates response actions to detected threats, streamlining security operations.
Threat Hunting: Proactively seeks out hidden threats through deep analysis and intelligent automation.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise needs, ensuring broadened coverage as security demands grow.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Increased Security Effectiveness: Enhanced threat detection and response improve overall security posture.
Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces the need for manual intervention, freeing up resources.
Rapid ROI: Gains in security and efficiency translate to a swift return on investment.
Adaptability: Scalable solutions allow organizations to tailor cybersecurity investments effectively.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, SentinelOne Wayfinder is implemented to meet stringent regulatory requirements and protect sensitive data. It integrates seamlessly within existing frameworks, offering a dynamic approach to threat management and ensuring compliance while minimizing risks associated with data breaches and cyber attacks.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Huntress, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.