Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Enterprise Routers

Ranking in Routers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Enterprise Routers is 17.2%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.4%, up from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Enterprise Routers	17.2%
Juniper MX Series Routers	13.4%
Other	69.4%

Routers

Featured Reviews

reviewer2759889

Pre-Sales Technical Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has supported robust enterprise deployments and management while pricing and market reach for advanced features need attention

I'm not sure what improvements could be made on the configuration scale since I'm not involved in complete configuration. Currently, it works effectively and they are incorporating AI adoption. Commercially and financially, the pricing is too high. Customers feel that Cisco Enterprise Routers will not offer the most competitive prices. If they can work on pricing, it would be easier for customers who are considering local products. In India, the government has implemented the Make in India initiative, and Cisco has established a manufacturing unit there. Regarding security products, they need to improve market reach, marketing, and training. While Cisco Enterprise Routers are user-friendly for network and wireless platforms, security product configuration and integration are considered complex compared to FortiGate, Check Point, Sophos, and Palo Alto. They have introduced solutions such as Cloud Defense Orchestrator and Firewall Manager (FMC), but the reach of Cisco security products in India needs improvement.

Read full review

Patrick Anaku

Senior Network Engineer at Roke Telkom

Performance excels with reliable uptime and robust features

The best features of Juniper MX Series Routers include their performance, which is quite good for us in terms of hardware performance. The Junos OS, the software, is stable, and we don't have many issues with the Juniper system itself. They have numerous features that allow us to deliver services, be it Layer 2 connectivity to customers, Layer 3 connectivity, data center connectivity, or even security features. Hardware performance has been a top-notch reason why we chose Juniper in the beginning, especially the MX series, which performs well in terms of network uptime and we don't encounter many failures. We have had a bad experience here and there with the ACX series, and their network performance is not so great compared to MX, so we have mostly done away with the ACX and only use MX at some of the core sites. I have seen a return on investment from the solution. Initially, we deployed MX80s on the network, and since our company has been in operation since 2006, from that point we used MX80s until around 2016 when we upgraded most of them to MX204s. From our experience, once we buy an MX204, we don't have issues with it; we have never had to replace an MX204 on the network. Once we deploy it, it works until we decide to upgrade the capacity. The return on investment is significant, as once we buy it, we have no worries about performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are stability and the initial setup wizard."

"We achieve good performance in our data center."

"These routers are stable and I don't know of any problems with them."

"The routing feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"I think Cisco Enterprise Routers are excellent."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ability to implement layer three protocols and layer two protocols like OSPS in BSS and BSC environments, with the Nexus Cisco 7000."

"Cisco Enterprise Routers are easy to use and the performance is good."

"We like that this solution is suitable for all organization sizes and levels."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers pros

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."

"The solution is stable."

"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."

"For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage the number of switched fabric codes and process features based on the specific switch requirements. Previously, I utilized them for processing and addressing customer-side concerns. The routers have excellent documentation, making it easy to resolve any issues that may arise. It's excellent for customization, especially in tailoring the Windows configuration environment. Overall, dealing with this solution has been straightforward and efficient."

"The functionality and stability are great."

"Users are able to easily configure the whole solution via simple data."

"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"The security could improve for Cisco Enterprise Routers. I understand there's a security appliance that is separate, but in terms of the router, there can be improvements made to prevent unwanted users from accessing the router or trying to manipulate the traffic that is passing through it."

"In terms of room for improvement, I think that there is a need for additional administration."

"The automation capabilities need improvement."

"This solution is scalable but it does need some improvements."

"Compared to equipment by other vendors, such as Check Point, the physical size of the units is bigger."

"I find licensing costs for Cisco Enterprise Routers to be expensive."

"The installation can be difficult, Cisco equipment is professional-grade and it requires someone with the skills and knowledge to do it."

"The solution is not easy to manage for people that do not have the experience."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers cons

"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."

"Enhancing the capacity would be a welcome improvement."

"Juniper must publish more information about Juniper MX Series Routers."

"The web interface can be improved."

"Automation can also be improved."

"There are areas for improvement in Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. One aspect that could be enhanced is the pricing; many clients acknowledge the quality of Juniper switches but find the pricing challenging, especially when compared to competitors like Huawei. Additionally, from a feature perspective, there's a desire for improved clarity and ease of configuration in Juniper switches. Some users find it difficult to understand and configure certain aspects, necessitating the use of external tools. This complexity, especially for Internet service providers, can be a barrier. Addressing these concerns could further strengthen the position of Juniper switches in the market."

"The solution needs to offer SDN features."

"The pricing is a bit too high."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our issues are basically currency related. The licensing is in dollars and the dollar is steadily rising. We've had an increase in the licensing fee due to the simple reason that the exchange rate is almost over 40%. That creates a major issue. If the currency devaluation doesn't stabilize, we may have to look at another solution."

"The price is reasonable."

"There is a router-only, perpetual license available for this product, but additional features will mean additional charges."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price is reasonable."

"Cisco Enterprise Routers are expensive."

"Cisco is mid-tier in terms of pricing and quite affordable by most enterprises."

"There is no licensing cost."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	43

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

How do Cisco Enterprise routers compare with Mikrotik routers and switches?

Cisco Enterprise Routers are very stable and easy to use. They offer a very solid performance and are very secure. They also have a very good, long lifespan. We feel the command configuration is ve...

What do you like most about Cisco Enterprise Routers?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it makes it possible for users to use encryption and decryption since our company aims to achieve transparency, and without it, the other system on...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Enterprise Routers?

It is expensive, but I am not the person purchasing the products; I just handle the configuration.

What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Comparisons

Compared 44% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 19% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 13% of the time

OneAccess Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 8% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Enterprise Routers Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 24% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 17% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 15% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 12% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 6% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Enterprise Routers

Download Cisco Enterprise Routers product report

Juniper MX Series Routers

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

No data available

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

The high-performance Cisco Enterprise Routers are the market leader due to their breadth of advanced support for LAN/WAN services, redundancy, reliability, and performance.

Cisco

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Boingo, Chartwell School, Children's Hospital of Orange County , Department of Justice, Explorer Pipeline, Linz AG, National Rugby League, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Telecom Italia, Transwestern

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers