


Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
I have seen a return on investment with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, and it is worth the money.
The documentation for Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It is well-organized and easy to access.
We couldn't calculate what would have been the cost if they had actually gotten compromised; however, they were in the process, so every investment was returned immediately.
On average, my SecOps team takes probably at least a quarter of the time, if not more, to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
I would rate Exabeam Fusion SIEM support team a nine out of ten; I do not give anyone a perfect score.
I also had the chance to look at the documentation, and the documentation is good.
The customer support for Sentinel is very good; any tickets logged will be answered immediately within the given timeframe.
We have paid for Splunk support, and we’re not on the free tier hoping for assistance; we are a significant customer and invest a lot in this service.
I have had nothing but good experiences with Splunk support, receiving timely and helpful replies.
We've had great customer success managers who have helped us navigate scaling from 600 gigs to 30 terabytes.
I believe Exabeam Fusion SIEM is excellent regarding scalability, and I would rate it at approximately an eight out of ten.
Regarding Exabeam's scalability and how well it adapts to its customers' needs, I would rate it an eight.
We currently rely on disaster recovery and backup recovery, which takes time to recover, during which you're basically blind, so I'm pushing my leadership team to switch over to a clustering environment for constant availability.
It is one of the things that separates it from other tooling, and if not, it is the most scalable solution out there.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
Regarding stability, I would rate Exabeam Fusion SIEM at approximately eight to eight and a half out of ten because it is very stable.
Overall, I think Exabeam's stability level is good.
They test it very thoroughly before release, and our customers have Splunk running for months without issues.
Splunk has been very reliable and very consistent.
We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration.
Price is always a consideration, so the price would be nice if it were lower.
Improving the infrastructure behind Splunk Enterprise Security is vital—enhanced cores, CPUs, and memory should be prioritized to support better processing power.
Splunk Enterprise Security is not something that automatically picks things; you have to set up use cases, update data models, and link the right use cases to the right data models for those detections to happen.
For any future enhancements or features, such as MLTK and SOAR platform integration, we need more visibility, training, and certification for the skilled professionals who are working.
The pricing for Exabeam Fusion SIEM is not cost prohibitive, but it was a little more than I initially thought.
They nearly always bill it in dollars, so if it can be billed in our currency, that would be helpful and fixed in our currency.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that while it is a little on the higher side, since it is part of a package for all Microsoft products, I feel it is a better choice comparatively than other SIEMs in the market.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I find it to be affordable, which is why every industry uses it.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far.
Sentinel's best features include that it's a very easy product to use.
In terms of metrics showing how Sentinel has helped, as part of log filtering, we have reduced around thirty to thirty-five percent of false-positive incident creation.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
I assess Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities for helping to find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior as great.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides the foundation for unified threat detection, investigation, and response, enabling fast identification of critical issues.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.3% |
| Exabeam | 1.7% |
| Sentinel | 2.7% |
| Other | 88.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 125 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 58 |
| Large Enterprise | 277 |
Exabeam offers intuitive interfaces, detailed dashboards, and powerful analytics to enhance security investigations. Its machine learning detects complex threats with automation streamlining tasks for efficiency and integration with AWS.
Exabeam stands out with its robust cybersecurity management capabilities, offering advanced user behavior analytics and incident detection tools. Security teams can use its systems to monitor events, create investigative timelines, and analyze log data. While praised for easy use, it benefits from initial training for optimal utilization. Challenges include the need for better flexibility, cost-management, and enhanced AI integration. However, it facilitates seamless AWS integration, real-time updates, and vulnerability prioritization within business contexts. Improvements in dashboard customization and overall performance, especially in UI and log ingestion, could enhance usability.
What are Exabeam's key features?Exabeam is widely used across industries such as finance and government for cybersecurity management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for integrating logs, protecting sensitive environments, and supporting compliance efforts. Its tools aid in detecting anomalies and managing security operations within infrastructures effectively.
Sentinel is a robust platform offering seamless native integration, enhanced security through transactional data, and a user-friendly interface reminiscent of Microsoft Windows. Its capabilities in threat detection, monitoring, and business intelligence integration make it an attractive choice for organizations.
Sentinel simplifies security management with its advanced features, including the Kusto Query Language and automation abilities that reduce the complexity of coding tasks. The platform's correlation engine allows for efficient rule generation, while its threat visibility and intelligence features offer preparation against risks. Advanced hunting queries, anomaly dashboards, and scalability options enhance its utility. Users appreciate its seamless connections with Microsoft tools and ability to improve threat detection through cloud and business intelligence integration. However, enhancements could improve documentation on security aspects, simplify dashboards, and optimize drag-and-drop features. There are suggestions for better device integration, a shift to web interfaces, and improved customization options, although some users face challenges with Unix scripting.
What are the most important features of Sentinel?Sentinel finds application across sectors for logging, security event monitoring, and integration with tools like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Users from industries such as government and academic institutions leverage its advanced SQL query support for customized responses, enhancing security measures with AI capabilities in diverse environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.
What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.