No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Entrust TransactionGuard vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Entrust and SAS are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Entrust is ranked #15 with an average rating of 6.0, while SAS is ranked #11. Entrust holds a 1.3% mindshare in FDP, compared to SAS’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Entrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Entrust TransactionGuard
Read 1 Entrust TransactionGuard review
  • 405 Views
  • 405 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SAS Fraud Management
Read 2 SAS Fraud Management reviews
  • 1,067 Views
  • 1,067 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Entrust TransactionGuard and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 886,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Entrust TransactionGuard
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
15th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Fraud Management
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Entrust TransactionGuard is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 2.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAS Fraud Management2.3%
Entrust TransactionGuard1.3%
Other96.4%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

IH
IsaacHammond
Head of IT at Skutin Solutions
Monitors transactions effectively but needs better support and more advanced AI
Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications. It offers integrations to many platforms, compatibility, and easy API integrations, providing effective fraud detection. The product reduces fraud for customers, especially within the financial services industry, by protecting transactions such as online payments and card usage. Without such solutions, online banking would face significant challenges.
Read full review
reviewer1562526 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1562526
Head of Practice at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been very good so far. That said, from my perspective, has had some issues with stability and performance issues in that they have a lot of data and it has some indexing and mechanisms that work a bit slow.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications."
"Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The security is also very good."
"The solution is very stable; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it has been reliable with very good performance so far."
"Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans — where the bank can monitor everything from one system."
 

Cons

"Entrust has an issue with support."
"Entrust has an issue with support. The technical support hardly ever involves getting an Entrust person to help on calls, and they often refer only to the documentation."
"Technical support could be much quicker and much more flexible."
"It is a little bit costly."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entrust TransactionGuard?
The pricing is quite affordable compared to other solutions, with a rating of six out of ten. There are additional costs for premium support.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Entrust TransactionGuard?
Entrust has an issue with support. The technical support hardly ever involves getting an Entrust person to help on calls, and they often refer only to the documentation. Another area for improvemen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Entrust TransactionGuard?
I am a system integrator providing professional services and implementing Entrust solutions for customers across Africa.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

IBM Trusteer vs Entrust TransactionGuard Logo
IBM Trusteer vs Entrust TransactionGuard
Compared 63% of the time
Accertify vs Entrust TransactionGuard Logo
Accertify vs Entrust TransactionGuard
Compared 37% of the time
More Entrust TransactionGuard Competitors
FICO Falcon Platform vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
FICO Falcon Platform vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 36% of the time
IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 19% of the time
DataVisor vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
DataVisor vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 13% of the time
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 11% of the time
ThreatMetrix vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
ThreatMetrix vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 8% of the time
More SAS Fraud Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2026
Entrust TransactionGuard reportDownload Entrust TransactionGuard product report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2026
SAS Fraud Management reportDownload SAS Fraud Management product report
 

Also Known As

TransactionGuard
No data available
 

Overview

Provides real-time monitoring of transactions, automatic detection of fraudulent activities and comprehensive case management tools.

Entrust

Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Banco Security, IndianMusicInfo.com, Oakland County Michigan, SILA Communications
Nets
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
886,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.