Entrust TransactionGuard vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Entrust Datacard Logo
81 views|60 comparisons
SAS Logo
1,206 views|671 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Entrust TransactionGuard and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
  • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    81
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,206
    Comparisons
    671
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TransactionGuard
    Learn More
    Overview

    Provides real-time monitoring of transactions, automatic detection of fraudulent activities and comprehensive case management tools.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Sample Customers
    Banco Security, IndianMusicInfo.com, Oakland County Michigan, SILA Communications
    Nets
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Entrust TransactionGuard is ranked 41st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Entrust TransactionGuard is rated 0.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Entrust TransactionGuard is most compared with , whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.