Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Entrust Datacard and Microsoft are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Microsoft’s 15.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

886 Views
621 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 233 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

9,863 Views
7,461 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Microsoft Entra ID are two prominent identity management solutions. Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust features suited for high-security needs, and user reviews highlight its effective encryption and extensive authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, providing a user-friendly experience that leverages existing Microsoft 365 applications.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is valued for its advanced encryption and multi-factor authentication, which users cite as crucial for protecting sensitive data. Microsoft Entra ID, on the other hand, is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft 365, making it a convenient choice for existing Microsoft users. The primary difference is that Entrust Identity Enterprise focuses on security enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID excels in integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users suggest that Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its reporting tools and user training resources. Microsoft Entra ID users often mention the need for more advanced security features and better scalability options. Entrust Identity Enterprise needs better usability enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID requires security advancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has a more complex deployment model, which users feel requires significant technical expertise. Microsoft Entra ID boasts a smoother deployment process due to its integration with the Microsoft suite. Users find customer service for Entrust satisfactory but slower than Microsoft’s prompt support. Entrust Identity Enterprise’s complexity is a barrier, while Microsoft Entra ID's integration eases deployment challenges.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher setup costs but is seen to provide significant ROI through enhanced security features. Microsoft Entra ID is perceived as offering better value for existing Microsoft users due to lower initial costs and integration benefits, though some users feel the ROI is limited by its need for additional security measures. Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher initial costs with notable security ROI, while Microsoft Entra ID offers economical entry with integration advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

11th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

233

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 15.9%, down from 21.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Aaron Liang

System engineer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Has significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment

Microsoft Entra ID has helped by simplifying our management of permissions for APIs. We are not directly exposing credentials, as we use tokens instead. It has made management easier and more secure, especially in a multi-user environment. The implementation of Microsoft Entra ID significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment, primarily through the widespread use of single-sign-on. Managing API permissions became much easier, as application registration often involves calling an API to utilize services without directly exposing credentials, relying instead on token-based authentication. This streamlined approach benefits end-users by simplifying access while remaining transparent to them. Ultimately, my role focuses on ensuring a smooth and user-friendly experience, even if the underlying technology remains unseen by the end-users. Our company strongly emphasizes passwordless authentication, primarily through device-bound passkeys in Microsoft Authenticator. While administrators with high-privileged accounts utilize YubiKeys and passwords for tasks like accessing Microsoft Graph, we are actively transitioning all other users towards passwordless methods such as Windows Hello biometrics. This approach streamlines authentication and enhances security. Though initial deployment in 2022 presented challenges due to hardware limitations and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the technology has significantly improved and provides a simple and effective user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Azure Active Directory features have helped improve our security posture. The remote working has been a massive help during the pandemic."

"User and device management is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to act as an identity provider for other cloud-based, SaaS applications. In our bank, this is the main identity provider for such features."

"We like the ease of app registrations and single sign-on with Entra ID. It offers an easy way to add multi-factor authentication to nearly any application and system."

"Microsoft Entra ID deserves a ten out of ten rating."

"Entra's conditional access policies allow us to fine-tune how we allow people into the environments and secure them."

"Azure Active Directory's single sign-on feature has been helpful because users don't need to authenticate again and again each time they access it. Users only need to sign in the first time, and Azure handles everything. We haven't experienced any errors or security-related issues in the past four years. Many people use our protection servers from outside, requiring multi-factor authentication. Each authentication is logged precisely."

"The benefits of using this solution were realized straightaway."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"Maybe there could be a dashboard view for Active Directory with some pie or bar charts on who is logged in, who is not logged in, and on the activity of each user for the past few days: whether they're active or not active."

"Microsoft's biggest challenge is the documentation."

"Its area of improvement is more about the synchronization of accounts and the intervals for that. Sometimes, there're customers with other network challenges, and it takes a while for synchronization to happen to the cloud. There is some component of their on-prem that is delaying things getting to the cloud. The turnaround time for these requests is very time-sensitive. I don't mean this as derogatory for this service, but in my experience, that happens a lot."

"Rule management and permissions need improvements. I have had discussions with product managers about these challenges and sent emails regarding them. Additionally, improvements are needed in the Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) side of things."

"The area that needs improvement is integrating IDs between multiple environments and forests. In our case, it's hard to get the identities from multiple forests into one location. This is probably our biggest challenge."

"They can improve how people manage their accounts. They can simplify and provide more information about adding or updating a phone number or email id in the MSA account. A lot of time users do get confused about where to go. For example, if I've changed my mobile number, where do I go and change my mobile number in the MSA account? A lot of time, employees think if they change the phone number in the HR database, it'll automatically get changed on the MSA account, which is not the case. Microsoft can simplify that and add these questions in the FAQ documents as well."

"It would be ideal if the solution moved to a passwordless type of environment. It's the future of authentification. It's also more secure and convenient."

"Many people believe that the Azure Active Directory is overly complicated and antiquated."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's worth the money."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It is very expensive. Its price should be lower. Price is the most important factor for Turkish people."

"Entra ID is not too bad, but Microsoft licensing generally is insane. Most customers normally buy a bundle license with Microsoft 365, E3, or E5. Out of our 2,000 customers, for 99.9% of our customers, the Entra ID license that they are getting through the part of that would be sufficient. There are some more advanced ones that give you a bit more functionality, but we probably have not had a customer for that. We do not even internally use that ourselves. When you buy the Entra ID license on its own, it is probably three or four pounds. You just get it included in the license."

"It is a packaged license. We have a Premium P1 subscription of Office 365, and it came with that."

"The price of the solution was reasonable."

"The price of the solution's license is good."

"For you to make use of some of the security features, you need to upgrade your licenses. If it is possible, could they just make some features free? For instance, for the Condition Access policy, you need to set that up and be on Azure AD P2 licensing. So if they could make it free or reduce the licensing for small businesses, that would be cool, as I believe security is for everyone."

"The E5 plan we are using contains the premium plans for Azure Active Directory. We are not paying only for the Azure Active Directory Premium licenses. We have it already included within our E5 plan."

"Microsoft Authenticator is included in the package when we purchase a license from Microsoft."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

May 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.