No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Elastic Security vs UnderDefense comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Torq's automation enhances efficiency, reduces manual tasks, and offers noticeable cost savings and productivity improvements within the first year.
Sentiment score
6.0
Elastic Security provides satisfactory ROI and cost savings, though users experience varied support levels and payback periods.
Sentiment score
8.0
Users saved time with detailed alerts, improving productivity and focus on development, security, and customer engagement.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
SOC Analyst at AppsFlyer
We have seen a return on investment, targeting a $600,000 ROI for the year.
Cyber Security Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have seen a return on investment with Torq, as the automation reduces the number of employees needed and significantly saves both time and resources.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Assistant Director at PTA
Log triage no longer takes up our security team's calendar, allowing those hours to go into platform architecture, our DRM protections, and proactive hardening.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Each alert comes with the caller, the endpoint, and the queries, so we do not dig through logs.
Internet Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
I have seen a return on investment, mainly in time and not having to build a team, as we did not need to hire a security team to get around-the-clock cloud coverage.
BD with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Torq's customer support is praised for responsiveness, attentiveness, 24/7 availability, and effectively assisting with setup and critical issues.
Sentiment score
6.4
Elastic Security support is inconsistent; users favor community and documentation, while premium users seek more responsive and personalized help.
Sentiment score
9.5
UnderDefense's customer service earns high ratings for exceptional responsiveness, clear communication, and quick assistance, achieving perfect satisfaction scores.
My impression of their technical support during the initial setup was that they were helpful, responded within a reasonable timeframe, and provided exactly what we needed.
Security Consultant at Integrity360
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Support is prompt and helpful.
Senior Cyber Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Assistant Director at PTA
I have not faced any difficulties with Elastic Security, as we have a pretty good support service from them.
Cyber Security Lead at Orange
When we needed a baseline adjusted or a finding explained, we got a clear answer quickly.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
I would rate the customer support on a scale of 1 to 10 as 10.
Founder at Urlicer
The customer support has been responsive and helpful.
Internet Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Torq excels in scalability with customization, handling high volumes, though browser issues may occur with large workflows.
Sentiment score
7.3
Elastic Security offers scalable solutions adaptable to various environments, praised for flexibility and requiring careful planning for integration.
Sentiment score
8.5
UnderDefense seamlessly manages high-traffic and dynamic environments, ensuring reliable coverage amidst increasing customer and endpoint volumes.
Its scalability is good because it has a cloud-native architecture and it expands dynamically to handle thousands of alerts at the same time.
Software Engineer at Accenture
Torq's scalability is a notable strength, as its workflow-based automation allows expansion from managing a few repetitive security tasks to handling more complex and high-volume SOC operations.
Data Specialist at TCS
Our case management is super scalable.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
Assistant Director at PTA
Elastic Security is quite scalable.
Cyber Security Lead at Orange
Our platform sees sharp spikes from bulk uploads and fast-spreading assets, and UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC handles them without needing us to resize or retune anything.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
UnderDefense's scalability is good, as the same coverage applies as our cloud environment grows without us changing anything on our side.
BD with 10,001+ employees
Our traffic is high, and UnderDefense handles it without us changing anything.
Internet Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Torq is stable and reliable, offering consistent performance with minimal downtime and rare, quickly resolved issues.
Sentiment score
7.7
Elastic Security is generally stable and reliable but can face challenges with big data and requires careful configuration.
Sentiment score
9.1
UnderDefense is praised for its stability, consistently providing reliable performance even during high traffic and stress scenarios.
I evaluate it based on service availability, workflow execution reliability, integration failures, and incident history.
Cybersecurity Analyst at Digital Direct Solution Private Limited
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
Senior Cyber Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We use it every day and it has run steadily, including when our traffic is high.
Internet Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

To improve Torq's platform, enhance error messaging, case management, UI, AI, integrations, templates, data handling, and reporting features.
Elastic Security needs improvements in authentication, usability, automation, scalability, integration, and pricing, with user-friendly dashboards and documentation.
Focus on including internal identifiers in alerts and onboarding templates to improve user experience and reduce setup time.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
The AI value depends on maturity. Real value depends heavily on telemetry, integration depth, and workflow design, all of which rely on how mature customers are in their SOC department.
Security Consultant at Integrity360
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
Senior Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
Senior Cyber Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Assistant Director at PTA
Machine learning algorithms become better with time; as they ingest a huge volume of data, they become better.
Cyber Security Lead at Orange
It is worth it for accurate triage later, but a template for common upload patterns will shorten that time.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
The setup and daily use have both been smooth.
BD with 10,001+ employees
Showing the customer name in the alert would help.
Internet Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers have mixed opinions on Torq's pricing, with some finding it affordable and others expensive but valuable.
Elastic Security provides a free open-source option, competitive pricing, and subscription plans, appealing to cost-conscious enterprises.
Users find UnderDefense cost-effective, easy to set up, and transparently priced, offering great value compared to in-house solutions.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Senior Cyber Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Senior Cyber Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Assistant Director at PTA
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
Performance Practice Specialist at a local government with 10,001+ employees
licensing was clear from the start, giving me good value for the price
Founder at Urlicer
Compared with building the same coverage in-house, it is a much lower cost and did not require us to hire.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Pricing was fair for what we get, setup was easy and took very little of our time, and the licensing was clear from the start, enabling us to see good value for the price.
BD with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Torq simplifies automation with a drag-and-drop interface, AI-driven alert management, and seamless third-party tool integration.
Elastic Security provides scalable, customizable threat response with fast search, real-time analysis, and strong community support for actionable insights.
UnderDefense offers anomaly detection, noise filtering, proactive reporting, 24/7 support, AI accuracy, governance, and efficient alert triage.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
Senior Cyber Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT.
Performance Practice Specialist at a local government with 10,001+ employees
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Assistant Director at PTA
The linking, the filtering, and the readable reasoning each help on their own, but together, they allow a small security team to handle the volume our platform produces without losing sight of the cases that matter.
SEO And Outreach Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
It has full-time support 24/7 with proactive reports, and monitoring runs around the clock.
Founder at Urlicer
The sorting signals and clear reports help my team day-to-day because every morning we look at a short list of cases that matter instead of a long list of raw alerts, and each case comes with the full picture, so we can decide in a few minutes whether it needs action.
BD with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Torq
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (1st), AI-Powered Security Automation (1st)
Elastic Security
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (14th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (11th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (25th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (12th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (13th)
UnderDefense
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (22nd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (10th), SOC as a Service (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (15th), Compliance Management (10th), AI-SOC (8th), AI-Powered Security Automation (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

AD
Solutions Architect at ProArch
Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency
Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.
Laurentiu Popescu - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Lead at Orange
Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows
The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.
Ivan Voitovych - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder at Urlicer
AI-driven SOC triage has transformed threat monitoring and keeps our security work focused
The best features UnderDefense offers include mostly triage in-context signals read together across my stack, where one finding replaces many separate checks. A good thing too is its false positive suppression, as I do not get false notifications. Normal activity such as traffic spikes during customer events is recognized and documented, and only the unusual cases reach me. It has full-time support 24/7 with proactive reports, and monitoring runs around the clock. Reports and alerts come to me without even noticing or asking, so it is very useful. My team sees what happened without having to chase it. I find the proactive reporting and 24/7 support to have definitely made a real difference. Proactive reports mean I hear about what happened without having to ask, so I know the state of things at the start of the day, and 24/7 support matters most for traffic spikes and other events outside busy working hours, as I get an answer when I need one without keeping someone on call just in case, saving me a lot of time. Together, they let my team stay on infrastructure work and step in only when a decision is needed. Regarding UnderDefense's AI capabilities, I think the governance and security is the best there is, as the decisions that matter stay with my team and each finding is documented, allowing me to review afterwards how a conclusion was reached. That control and traceability is what I need from AI in a security role. The accuracy and reliability of UnderDefense's AI output is accurate and steady, as findings have matched what I saw when I checked them, and the pattern assessments are consistent, especially during large traffic events or spikes, which is when I depend on them most. When a case needs judgment, the reasoning is there so I can confirm it myself.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
39%
Construction Company
13%
Security Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?
What has not worked as well as I hoped with Torq is related to product data management and storing data, although it ...
What is your primary use case for Torq?
My main use case for Torq is for managing IT services and providing faster response.
What advice do you have for others considering Torq?
I would rate Torq a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. I chose this rating because customer service is excellent. I suggest to...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several time...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.
What needs improvement with Elastic Security?
I do not have any specific recommendations for improvements in Elastic Security, but I feel that the AI module should...
What is your primary use case for UnderDefense?
Our main use case for UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC is to watch how accounts actually use our platform. Our product is ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UnderDefense?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been fair for what we get. Compared with building the same...
What needs improvement with UnderDefense?
UnderDefense could improve in onboarding, which takes some dedicated time because the baseline for our high volume up...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Kyte, Betsson Grourp, Mammut, Accedian.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.