Apache Spark vs Eclipse MicroProfile comparison

Apache and Eclipse Foundation are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Eclipse Foundation is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Apache holds a 5.6% mindshare in JF, compared to Eclipse Foundation’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Eclipse Foundation users who would recommend it.

Apache Spark

Read 66 Apache Spark reviews

2,198 Views
1,690 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Eclipse MicroProfile

Read 3 Eclipse MicroProfile reviews

2,076 Views
1,770 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Spark

Eclipse MicroProfile

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Eclipse MicroProfile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark

Ranking in Java Frameworks

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (1st), Compute Service (4th)

Eclipse MicroProfile

Ranking in Java Frameworks

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Apache Spark is 5.6%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eclipse MicroProfile is 6.5%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

Ilya Afanasyev

Senior Software Development Engineer at Yahoo!

Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well

We use batch processing. It works well with our formats and file versions. There's a lot of functionality. In our pipeline each hour, we make a copy of data from MongoDB, of the changes from MongoDB to some specific file. Each time pipeline copied all of the data, it would do it each time without changes to all of the tables. Tables have a lot of data, and in the last MongoDB version, there is a possibility to read only changed data. This reduced the cost and configuration of the cluster, and we saved about $150,000. The solution is scalable. It's a stable product.

Read full review

Idris Oyibo Igagwu

Integration Developer at FHI 360

Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to support dynamic developer profiles. We can easily create multiple accounts and rooms for different…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Features include machine learning, real time streaming, and data processing."

"The processing time is very much improved over the data warehouse solution that we were using."

"I like that it can handle multiple tasks parallelly. I also like the automation feature. JavaScript also helps with the parallel streaming of the library."

"The memory processing engine is the solution's most valuable aspect. It processes everything extremely fast, and it's in the cluster itself. It acts as a memory engine and is very effective in processing data correctly."

"I found the solution stable. We haven't had any problems with it."

"This solution provides a clear and convenient syntax for our analytical tasks."

"It is highly scalable, allowing you to efficiently work with extensive datasets that might be problematic to handle using traditional tools that are memory-constrained."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

More Apache Spark pros

"The solution is stable."

"We use the solution to create microservices."

"Provides a lightweight runtime."

Cons

"The Spark solution could improve in scheduling tasks and managing dependencies."

"When you want to extract data from your HDFS and other sources then it is kind of tricky because you have to connect with those sources."

"I know there is always discussion about which language to write applications in and some people do love Scala. However, I don't like it."

"This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed."

"Dynamic DataFrame options are not yet available."

"One limitation is that not all machine learning libraries and models support it."

"If you have a Spark session in the background, sometimes it's very hard to kill these sessions because of D allocation."

"The solution’s integration with other platforms should be improved."

More Apache Spark cons

"Deployment of microservers in the Kubernetes environment is difficult."

"The tool needs to improve its messaging."

"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache Spark is an open-source solution, and there is no cost involved in deploying the solution on-premises."

"It is quite expensive. In fact, it accounts for almost 50% of the cost of our entire project."

"It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."

"Licensing costs can vary. For instance, when purchasing a virtual machine, you're asked if you want to take advantage of the hybrid benefit or if you prefer the license costs to be included upfront by the cloud service provider, such as Azure. If you choose the hybrid benefit, it indicates you already possess a license for the operating system and wish to avoid additional charges for that specific VM in Azure. This approach allows for a reduction in licensing costs, charging only for the service and associated resources."

"On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."

"The solution is affordable and there are no additional licensing costs."

"Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."

More Apache Spark pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark?

We use Spark to process data from different data sources.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?

Compared to other solutions like Doc DB, Spark is more costly due to the need for extensive infrastructure. It requires significant investment in infrastructure, which can be expensive. While cloud...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Spark?

The Spark solution could improve in scheduling tasks and managing dependencies. Spark alone cannot handle sequential tasks, requiring environments like Airflow scheduler or scripts. For instance, o...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?

Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eclipse MicroProfile?

The solution is stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eclipse MicroProfile?

The solution's performance speed could be better while working on the browser. Also, they should include an option for online publishing. It will make sharing work easier. We can just publish work ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs Apache Spark

Compared 26% of the time

AWS Batch vs Apache Spark

Compared 12% of the time

SAP HANA vs Apache Spark

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Apache Spark

Compared 7% of the time

Spark SQL vs Apache Spark

Compared 7% of the time

More Apache Spark Competitors

Spring Boot vs Eclipse MicroProfile

Compared 82% of the time

Jakarta EE vs Eclipse MicroProfile

Compared 7% of the time

Open Liberty vs Eclipse MicroProfile

Compared 6% of the time

Vert.x vs Eclipse MicroProfile

Compared 5% of the time

More Eclipse MicroProfile Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark

April 2025

Download Apache Spark product report

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

April 2025

Download Eclipse MicroProfile product report

Overview

Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

Apache

Many innovative "microservice" Enterprise Java environments and frameworks already exist in the Java ecosystem. These projects are creating new features and capabilities to address microservice architectures -- leveraging both Java EE and non-Java EE technologies.

The goal of the Eclipse MicroProfile project is to iterate and innovate in short cycles to propose new common APIs and functionality, get community approval, release, and repeat. Eventually, the outputs of this project could be submitted to the Eclipse Jakarta EE, JCP, OpenJDK or any relevant standards body.

Eclipse Foundation

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile

April 2025

Free Report: Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Spark vs. Eclipse MicroProfile report.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.