Dynatrace vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Dynatrace and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Monitoring category. Additionally, 95% of Dynatrace users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Dynatrace

Read 360 Dynatrace reviews

41,435 Views
7,044 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Dynatrace and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] compete in the application performance monitoring and Kubernetes management space, respectively. Dynatrace tends to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Features: Dynatrace provides user experience monitoring, transaction analysis, and PurePath technology for deep insights into code behavior. It requires minimal administration post-installation and offers robust flexibility with dynamic reporting. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] integrates seamlessly with Nutanix's hyper-converged infrastructure, providing ease of use and quick deployment integrated with the hypervisor.

Room for Improvement: Dynatrace users have highlighted issues with its complex pricing model, occasional sluggishness in the user interface, and difficulties with certain integrations. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] needs improvements in scalability, support for high-performance computing, and seamless integration with other platforms. Both products can enhance support for complex use cases and management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dynatrace supports diverse deployment options including on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, and offers commendable customer service, although response times for complex issues could be improved. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is primarily on-premises with positive customer feedback but suggestions for enhanced support efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Dynatrace is known for premium pricing which some consider high but justified by its extensive features, offering high ROI for larger enterprises with improved issue resolution and resource management. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] provides a more affordable structure, appealing to existing Nutanix users with good value through built-in hypervisor capabilities, though its ROI impact is less emphasized compared to Dynatrace.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Monitoring Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Monitoring

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dynatrace

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

360

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (2nd), Log Management (6th), Mobile APM (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (2nd), AI Observability (3rd)

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

AI-driven insights have reduced downtime and improved cross-team collaboration

We encountered some challenges while using Dynatrace. Although the initial setup was smooth, fine-tuning alert thresholds and custom metrics took some time. Another challenge was that Dynatrace charges based on host units, so we had to carefully plan our agent deployments. The licensing model is expensive. Additionally, the complexity of setup is an issue. While OneAgent and auto-discover services are powerful, the setup is more complex compared to other tools such as Prometheus and Grafana. These integrations are simple and basic, but Dynatrace setup requires more complexity based on the environment. For new users wanting to use Dynatrace, it is difficult. However, the AI-related solutions and metrics took us to the next level for identifying and fixing things. Dynatrace requires an agent for operation. OneAgent is powerful, but it is also resource-heavy. On lightweight nodes or older systems, the agent can slightly impact performance. If Dynatrace could implement a lightweight agent behavior, we could make things faster. Additionally, if Dynatrace could add a long-term retention policy so that we could store more data and find fine-grained details, that would help us. While Dynatrace managed edition supports on-premises deployment, the SaaS version depends on cloud connectivity. For highly regulated or air-gapped environments, setup and updates can be challenging. Although the initial setup is smooth, if someone wants to fine-tune it and fully understand the tool end-to-end, it could be tricky.

Read full review

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Dynatrace positively impacts our organization because it is a unified monitoring solution that centralizes the performance of infrastructure, application, and database."

"I advise anyone looking to set up a monitoring system in their project to consider Dynatrace because it will monitor their infrastructure, servers, and application performance, providing automatic service discovery and real-time metrics; it is the best option to choose or set up in their project."

"Our company gets quick response times and qualified responses from technical support, so that is good."

"The Dynatrace support team that we have is great and the staff that we have had onsite has been consistently good."

"The view it provides for default analysis is very nice. The way in which it showcases how the metrics have been captured and how lucidly that they are displayed. This is a good thing to have from a technical and non-technical perspective."

"My primary use of the tool is to keep revenue coming into the business and to use it to help our business team in running their site analytics and web performance tools. They have things like Adobe Analytics that provide them with one layer of data. We use Dynatrace as another railroad metric to both confirm the Adobe Analytics data and enhance it in certain places where Adobe won't give us the answers that we need. In terms of metrics, we've had roughly about 120,000 unique sessions per hour on our website. So, we're capturing a lot of session data and real user data, and all of that data is kept in user sessions. We can look this information up by user ID to tag any given session that we want to find by date/client. E.g., if the user said that they had an issue last Thursday at 11:00 PM, then we can just do a search on their email address, go through all their sessions, and find the one that they mentioned, then dig directly into that one."

"In previous companies where the deployment has been more mature, it was definitely allowing DevOps to concentrate on shipping quality rather than where I am now, which is deploying Dynatrace."

"Dynatrace has far more comprehensive and useful details to help us to identify bottleneck issues and fix them."

More Dynatrace pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"I would recommend using this product, it's very good."

"Karbon is embedded in the hypervisor, there are no deployment costs and the administration is via Prism Central."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"The technical support is excellent."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

Cons

"Sometimes it is hard to find the right setting for what you want to change."

"The dashboard tool needs to be improved. We need more options, because the look and feel is too old-fashioned."

"When it comes to monitoring, we did the integration with VMware vCenter, and we were able to see some good stuff. The VMware vCenter integration was really great, but what we really missed was the integration with the network management stuff such as Cisco ACI. We wanted to see integration in that area, but it was not provided by Dynatrace. So, the main feature for us is integration with things like Cisco ACI. If they can bring that one in, with vCenter in there, it would be a total solution. It would be absolutely incomparable to anything else in the market."

"I also wish there was the ability to do alert filtering before it triggered an alert with PagerDuty/OpsGenie/Slack."

"The thing that is preventing us from moving forward with Dynatrace right now is that we can't tag our customer traffic with a customizable tag. All of our students have a unique identifier and in AppMon we tag that and we can search by it very easily and it's very useful. But in Dynatrace, you can't yet customize and find people like that, so that's really preventing us. I heard that it's being worked on but I'm not sure when it's coming out."

"I would like to see income monitoring for the servers and infrastructure monitoring."

"Setting up the thresholds and alerting, it is complicated to understand their use cases."

"The web version of the client interface needs more features that are in the Java-based thick client."

More Dynatrace cons

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"It's mostly for lab purposes; we haven't seen a lot of traction in the market from enterprise customers yet."

"There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are buying more licenses, because we are seeing more value."

"There was also some complexity in the adoption rate of it because of how costly the licensing is."

"The only limitation with scaling to cloud-native environments is licensing. It all depends on how many DEM units you're willing to license. The more of DEM units that you purchase, the more user data you can collect."

"I feel the price is good for what the product does."

"We have a three-year contract. We have 30 licenses for the full stack and 3 licenses for the DEM unit."

"Surprisingly, it is quite expensive. That is something that we could always see: Improved pricing and the overall construct on how do we use each license in regards to usage of the tool."

"It is quite expensive for startups."

"The price range is quite high."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	300

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I don't have a technical role, but we are a system integrator, so we sell solutions such as OpenShift and Kubernetes as part of the sales team. We are a reseller called eSky IT, and I serve as the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 4% of the time

Avantra vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 3% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Sysdig Monitor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

September 2026

Download Dynatrace product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

September 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

Dynatrace is advancing observability for today’s digital businesses, helping to transform the complexity of modern digital ecosystems into powerful business assets. By leveraging AI-powered insights, Dynatrace enables organizations to analyze, automate, and innovate faster to drive their business forward. To learn more about how Dynatrace can help your business, visit www.dynatrace.com, visit our blog and follow us on LinkedIn and X @dynatrace.

Dynatrace

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

TD Bank, Zurich North America, Accenture, Macquarie, United Airlines, Raymond James, BT, Vodafone, Air France-KLM, TELUS, American Airlines, Air Canada, ADT, Virgin Money

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Dynatrace, Datadog and others in Container Monitoring. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.