DX Spectrum vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Icinga is ranked #49. Broadcom holds a 1.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

DX Spectrum

Read 118 DX Spectrum reviews

16,267 Views
9,598 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

8,249 Views
5,939 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

DX Spectrum

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Spectrum, CA Spectrum, and Icinga compete in the network management and monitoring category. DX Spectrum appears to have the upper hand in scalability and comprehensive management, while Icinga stands out in automation and flexibility.

Features: DX Spectrum provides extensive network topology views, effective alerting systems, and support for diverse device types. CA Spectrum offers reliable incident and event management and deep integration with CA products. Icinga is strong in automation, features numerous plugins, and its open-source nature offers significant flexibility.

Room for Improvement: DX Spectrum could enhance its configuration simplicity and update its MIB databases, tackling Java dependency and integration complexity. Icinga would benefit from better dashboard capabilities and more structured designs, with improvements in clustering and multi-tenancy being crucial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both DX Spectrum and Icinga are primarily deployed on-premises. DX Spectrum receives average to exceptional customer service ratings, although some users note issues post-acquisition. Icinga's support is average but is bolstered by a strong community and self-support systems.

Pricing and ROI: DX Spectrum's pricing model suits larger enterprises due to its extensive features, with ROI being driven by lower operational costs. Icinga offers a low-cost entry as an open-source solution, with optional paid support, making it cost-effective for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Spectrum vs. Icinga Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Spectrum

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

17th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

118

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (7th), Network Troubleshooting (6th), DX NetOps (1st)

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Spectrum is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Spectrum	1.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	97.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PinchasAlbalya

Network Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitoring has become centralized and management now sees real‑time health of key network assets

The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we took an external vendor to install and make the customization. If we want to make others changes without paying for customization, we need to learn it deeply by ourselves. The tutorials are very complicated. They could work on that area. The tutorial part could be more simplified. I know there are many explanations, and you can get help or documents in one click on the current page in the product, but it is not very clear. If you want to do something new that you did not see from the vendor in the installation, it is not very simple. The documents are good for people that know how to operate the product well, but for new users, it is not simple.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CA is very complicated but has a lot of features."

"I can use it to detect whenever things go wrong on my network."

"It has a highly scalable architecture that is designed to ensure accommodation of the growing network setup for our client."

"We were able to clearly identify the root cause of incidents visually and with specimen alerts with the topology design."

"Technical support is the best in class."

"If you like to sleep at night and not be disturbed on the weekends, get Spectrum."

"This is a very stable product and helps us to be proactive and prevents the company from losing money and business by monitoring the entire network (data and voice) of the company (head office and branches) in real time, showing exactly where errors occur."

"Thanks to Spectrum, we are able to monitor (and send out alarms for) our whole IT infrastructure 7/24 without having more than a minimal number of technical persons."

More DX Spectrum pros

"We monitor all, starting from UPS to international mail chains."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

"The most valuable feature is one that not many are even aware of, as Icinga has a self-healing event handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted, and you can configure the handler to take action after the critical alarm without human interaction."

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"Technical support is so-so. It depends on who you get."

"Event correlation only works on one server, rather than on all of the servers in the same cluster environment."

"HTML5. Right now, it is a very Java driven application. We have lots of issues."

"Reporting and network bandwidth monitoring features needs to be improved."

"Today with Spectrum we work in a reactive way where we notice problems after they occur."

"From the users perspective the looks and feel of dashboards of Spectrum would be easier to use and for understanding as APM will be in 10.5 version which we saw in CA World."

"This solution is too complicated to use for us, especially if you have many components."

"The platform is complicated to use."

More DX Spectrum cons

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management)."

"It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly."

"It is very pricey. With the current trend of enterprises moving towards cheaper and more modern looking solutions like ManageEngine, SevOne, ServicePilot, and Paesller."

"The price is very high."

"Since the acquisition by Broadcom, we have not had such a good experience with licensing and pricing. Since they were bought by Broadcom, every sales contract is getting complicated. It's very complicated, and it's much more expensive than before. It's not a good pricing strategy from Broadcom."

"Spectrum is expensive."

"DX Spectrum's pricing depends on the license number. It is affordable."

"The price is good enough to expect an ideal solution. It's expensive."

More DX Spectrum pricing and cost advice

"The solution is free to use."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The solution is cheap."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It's an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Educational Organization

14%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	90

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Spectrum?

The price is very, very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Spectrum?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Spectrum?

The university purchased DX Spectrum, called ICE. DX Spectrum NAC is working for us only on Cisco 9200 switches. It is not working on any other switch like C1000 or HG or any 2960X. Even other Cisc...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs DX Spectrum

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Spectrum

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

Kentik vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Spectrum Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum

November 2026

Download DX Spectrum product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

CA Spectrum

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

DX Spectrum is a comprehensive network monitoring tool designed for scalability and accuracy. With features like fault management, topological mapping, and customizability, it addresses network issues effectively while ensuring reliable infrastructure oversight.

Known for its robust capabilities, DX Spectrum excels in fault management and network monitoring, offering features such as Global Collections and Event Correlation for precise issue detection. This scalability allows it to monitor large infrastructures efficiently using SNMP traps. Automated device discovery and seamless integrations with tools like SOI and Zabbix enhance its functionality, providing users with a streamlined experience. The interface allows for deep visibility and is supported by REST API for improved integration and automation.

What are the key features of DX Spectrum?

Fault Management: Identifies and manages network faults efficiently.
Topological Mapping: Offers a graphical representation of network topology.
Customizability: Provides extensive options to tailor the tool to specific needs.
Global Collections: Enhances issue detection across networks.
Event Correlation: Reduces false alerts by correlating network events.
Scalability: Manages large networks with SNMP traps.
Automated Discovery: Automatically identifies and integrates devices into monitoring.
REST API: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.

Why should users consider DX Spectrum in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency through automation and integration.
Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive network visibility and control.
Reliability: Ensures stable and reliable network operations.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with multiple external tools.
Customizability: Allows customization to meet specific monitoring needs.
Proactive Management: Supports proactive issue resolution with accurate notifications.

DX Spectrum finds extensive applications across industries for network infrastructure monitoring. It is vital in sectors where maintaining service uptime and quickly resolving network faults is critical. Organizations leverage its configuration management, alarm/event management, and integration capabilities to maintain smooth network operations, especially in environments with large and complex network infrastructures.

Broadcom

Icinga is an open-source monitoring platform known for stability and scalability. It offers object-oriented configuration, extensive plugins, and community support, providing a robust environment for monitoring servers, network devices, and infrastructure components.

Icinga facilitates intuitive setup through features like the Icinga Director, allowing for efficient configuration, automation via APIs, and flexible customization with add-ons. It supports clustering for distributed monitoring and self-healing event handlers. Integration with external tools further enhances its adaptability. While valuable, users suggest improvements in dashboard aesthetics, installation procedures, and data consistency. Automation and network discovery capabilities require further development, as does the need for built-in scripts and plugins. Icinga proves complex for beginners, with multi-tenancy support rated average and role management needing simplification.

What are Icinga's main features?

Object-Oriented Configuration: Simplifies custom plugin development and setup.
Icinga Director: Facilitates intuitive and efficient configuration management.
API Automation: Enables automated processes and seamless integrations.
Clustering Support: Allows scalable and distributed monitoring solutions.
Self-Healing Event Handlers: Automatically manage and correct system issues.
Integration and Add-Ons: Expands functionality with external tools.

Which benefits do reviews often highlight?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing monitoring needs.
Community Support: Access to a wide range of shared knowledge and solutions.
Customizability: Tailors the platform to meet specific monitoring requirements.
Stability: Delivers consistent performance and reliability.

Organizations use Icinga to monitor Linux and AIX servers along with network devices, storage, and firewalls. It supports resource surveillance, application checks, automated ticket generation, and alerting. Managed service providers use it for multi-tenancy setups, finding it essential for server health and configuration management across mixed infrastructure landscapes, leveraging plugins and SNMP Traps for proactive monitoring.

Icinga

Sample Customers

National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

November 2026

Free Report: DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Spectrum vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.