DX NetOps vs eG Enterprise comparison

Broadcom and eg Innovations are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.8, while eg Innovations is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to eg Innovations’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of eg Innovations users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,522 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

eG Enterprise

Read 21 eG Enterprise reviews

2,067 Views
889 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

eG Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

eG Enterprise and DX NetOps are competing within the realm of IT monitoring solutions. eG Enterprise appears to have a slight edge with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and robust support.

Features: eG Enterprise offers a single-pane view, extensive visibility into the Citrix stack, and robust diagnostic capabilities. It also includes user behavior monitoring and delivers end-to-end monitoring across all OSI layers. DX NetOps offers straightforward setup, powerful performance management, and detailed network resource tracking capabilities.

Room for Improvement: eG Enterprise can improve its networking monitoring capabilities and dashboard flexibility, streamline configuration processes, and enhance technical support responsiveness. DX NetOps may focus on better module integration, embedding native automation features, and refining the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both eG Enterprise and DX NetOps support solid on-premises deployments; DX NetOps extends to hybrid cloud capabilities. eG Enterprise is recognized for exceptional customer service, with fast issue resolution, while DX NetOps also delivers responsive service despite occasional criticisms about support consistency.

Pricing and ROI: eG Enterprise is known for its cost-effective subscription model and flexible licensing, though pricing strategy improvements are noted. Users often see a reduction in service requests. DX NetOps, initially pricier, becomes competitive with discounts and offers good value with packaged products. Both solutions achieve high ROI with significant cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

eG Enterprise

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (45th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (43rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of eG Enterprise is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
eG Enterprise	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Jose Ramon Crespo

Senior Enterprise Director at Towers IT

Utilize artificial intelligence for faster issue response and seamless ITSM integration

The data gathering capabilities and the automation, which utilizes artificial intelligence, are the most valuable features. These capabilities help us gather more information and analyze it faster, leading to better responses to issues. The tool is also excellent at integrating with ITSM services, providing a seamless alerting system for our customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The solution is stable."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

More DX NetOps pros

"Single pane of glass to review status of the full environment."

"The GUI is nicer than all the other graphical interfaces out there."

"It gives good insight into inside of what's going on with Exchange."

"EG monitors all infrastructure elements (all OS, all database, storage, network, and web server) from a single console."

"The topology view which provides a visual representation of a service and quickly allows identification of errors or degraded performance."

"The most important feature is the ability to design, then implement monitoring tests on the fly as we are adapting to different situations."

"Some of the best features of eG are, in terms of APM, they have complete modules between application performance monitoring, server monitoring, and even storage and network-based monitoring. The UI is also quite good. They have some standard AI-based capabilities, even though it's not quite as advanced when compared to Dynatrace. eG has some good, basic APM capabilities."

"Its ability to monitor failures and to restart a Windows service when it fails."

More eG Enterprise pros

Cons

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

More DX NetOps cons

"The solution needs to enhance the management dashboards."

"The interface could be improved as it is not real intuitive. It is not user-friendly."

"The integration must be improved."

"The UI looks a little dated and could do with a refresh."

"The solution should improve on the security side and include some more API integrations into wider application platforms."

"Dashboards are difficult to create, and not so useful."

"I can understand why they designed the user interface (UI) the way they did, but sometimes in the management of the eG Manager, it can be a bit clunky."

"Back-end configuration is not easy to implement."

More eG Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"eG Enterprise is much cheaper than the other products it competes with."

"The cost for eG Enterprise is almost $100,000 for one hundred and fifty services. It's subscription-based and the payment is yearly."

"There are two licensing options: Perpetual and SaaS-based. The main offering, in terms of what eG prefers to offer, is the subscription-based rather than the Perpetual License. The price could be cheaper."

"It'd be nice if the price was lower. That would be an improvement."

"It is not expensive."

"You may get some monitoring products with certain licensing you may own. Some of these can take ages to configure and setup, along with needing a license to drive the software."

"The product is very cheap."

"We paid about 300,000 Saudi Riyal for the solution and it was quite affordable compared to the competition."

More eG Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

Could you please share your requirements ? There are a lot tools can be added to the list. I spent almost 6 months to test and check many tools then I select eG enterprise.

See all answers

Do you recommend eG Enterprise? Why or why not?

I feel that eG Enterprise is one of the top APM tools available on the market. Out of the solutions I have tried, it is the best for monitoring, diagnosis, analytics, and reporting of key IT servic...

See all answers

What do you like most about eG Enterprise?

eG Enterprise has a single pane of glass for observability and monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs eG Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs eG Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs eG Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

LogicMonitor vs eG Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs eG Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

More eG Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

January 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

eG Enterprise

January 2026

Download eG Enterprise product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

eG Enterprise is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool that monitors applications, infrastructure, and networks. eG Enterprise offers a complete performance management solution that delivers diagnosis and automated IT auditing, and offers extensive reporting to test application latencies, storage hotspots, network failures, server incompetencies, bottlenecks, user experience (UX) concerns, and more.

eG Enterprise monitors an organization’s total IT ecosystem and applications throughout every layer and all tiers and will take a deep dive to discover where a problem began, faster than any other solution. eG Enterprise is a complete solution that thoroughly monitors the end-user relationship for just about every IT deployment available, such as cloud-based microservices applications, enterprise applications, on-premise monolithic applications, and digital workspaces.

eG Enterprise is a flexible solution and can be deployed in various circumstances, wherever the digital experience of the user needs to be managed and IT infrastructures and applications need to be monitored. eG Enterprise is effective from legacy on-premise deployments to the most cloud-centric ecosystem in the marketplace today.

eG Enterprise Features

Application Performance Monitoring (APM): The solution is able to provide monitoring to discover, diagnose, and repair application performance problems so the end user is never affected.
Infrastructure monitoring: Users have full transparency to clearly visualize what is occurring with recent deployments and immediately diagnose network, database, and server problems.
Digital workspace monitoring: Workspaces are continually monitored to maintain the highest levels of productivity at all times. Users can easily monitor disconnects, logons, slowdowns, complete sessions, and more.
Enterprise application monitoring: Applications that do not perform as expected may result in significant losses for an organization. eG Enterprise is able to monitor many of today’s popular applications, such as PeopleSoft, SAP, Sharepoint, Siebel, and Office 365. Organizations are able to quickly identify underperforming applications, discover and diagnose problems, and remediate issues to ensure that optimal levels of productivity and profitability are being maintained at all times.
Cloud Monitoring: eG Enterprise provides effective monitoring for all of an organization's cloud infrastructures, including public, hybrid and private. eG Enterprise is able to facilitate the concise mapping of the relationships between tiers and discover the reasons for performance problems immediately before they reach the end user. eG Enterprise can be deployed on premises or as a SaaS-based solution.

Reviews from Real Users

“The product makes data collection easy. It's simple to set up. The algorithm is the most valuable aspect of the solution. In a few minutes after the installations, we can get insights from my technical environment. After a few minutes, I can get some valuable insights to make decisions.” - Anderson L., LatAm Presales Analyst at CLM

“Some of the best features of eG are, in terms of APM, they have complete modules between application performance monitoring, server monitoring, and even storage and network-based monitoring. The UI is also quite good. They have some standard AI-based capabilities, even though it's not quite as advanced when compared to Dynatrace. eG has some good, basic APM capabilities.” - A PeerSpot user who is a Consultant at a tech services company

eg Innovations

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

20th Century Fox, Allscripts, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Aviva, AXA, Biogen, Cox Communications, Denver Health, eBay, JP Morgan Chase, PayPal, Southern California Edison, Samsung, and many more.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. eG Enterprise report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.