We performed a comparison between Drupal and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"It is good for big projects."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"The user interface can be improved."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS and SDL Tridion DX, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet and Hyland OnBase.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
