Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Dotcom-Monitor and Progress Software are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #20, while Progress Software is ranked #22. Dotcom-Monitor holds a 0.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to Progress Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

117 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

94 Views
58 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and Telerik Test Studio are products in the performance and automated testing tool category. Telerik Test Studio appears to have an advantage due to its comprehensive test automation capabilities and ease of use.

Features: LoadView provides cloud-based load testing, real-browser testing, and customizable load scenarios. Telerik Test Studio supports automation across web, desktop, and mobile applications, and offers intuitive recording and playback features. Its broad functionality makes it a strong contender in the test automation field.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadView ensures easy deployment with cloud-based setups and accessible customer service. Telerik Test Studio offers a robust deployment model suitable for various business environments, with responsive support and extensive training materials, enhancing its service delivery.

Pricing and ROI: LoadView provides competitively priced plans with a solid return on investment through its specialized load testing. Telerik Test Studio, while more expensive, delivers significant ROI with its extensive testing capabilities and scalability, making it a valuable investment for larger testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Regression Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

Cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 100% of the time

More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 38% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

LoadView Stress Testing

No data available

Overview

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com

Dotcom-Monitor

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Free Report: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.