Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs k6 Open Source comparison

Dotcom-Monitor and k6 are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #20, while k6 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. Dotcom-Monitor holds a 0.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to k6’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of k6 users who would recommend it.

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

117 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

524 Views
383 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

k6 Open Source

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView and k6 Open Source are competitors in the performance testing category. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView holds an advantage in features and customer support, while k6 Open Source excels in adaptability and scripting flexibility.

Features: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView provides real-browser simulation, extensive reporting tools, and dynamic testing capabilities, making it suitable for companies seeking robust data insights and scalability. k6 Open Source is ideal for developers, offering scriptable load tests, easy CI/CD integration, and developer-centric features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView has an intuitive setup with strong support, making it accessible for non-technical users. k6 Open Source requires a technical setup and relies on community forums for support, appealing to users with technical expertise seeking flexibility over structured service.

Pricing and ROI: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView involves a higher initial cost, justified by its comprehensive features and enhanced support. k6 Open Source is cost-effective, offering significant ROI through its powerful, adaptable open-source framework, particularly for teams adept in technical deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of k6 Open Source is 3.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

Cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 100% of the time

More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 52% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs k6 Open Source

Compared 8% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Also Known As

LoadView Stress Testing

Load Impact

Overview

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com

Dotcom-Monitor

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source

April 2025

Free Report: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.