Dell CloudIQ vs Nagios Core comparison

Dell Technologies and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Dell Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nagios is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Dell Technologies holds a 0.9% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Dell CloudIQ

Read 9 Dell CloudIQ reviews

1,478 Views
506 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,039 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Nagios Core and Dell CloudIQ compete in network monitoring and IT operations management. Dell CloudIQ seems to have the upper hand with its advanced analytics and integration capabilities.

Features: Nagios Core offers strong monitoring capabilities, modular architecture, and plugin support, enhancing its customizability. Dell CloudIQ delivers predictive analytics, cloud-based monitoring, and intelligent insights, providing comprehensive monitoring and newer tech integration.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core can improve in simplifying deployment, offering more built-in analytics, and reducing reliance on technical expertise for plugin customization. Dell CloudIQ could enhance flexibility in customizations, expand community resource support, and potentially offer more pricing tiers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core's deployment can be complex, requiring manual configuration and technical skills, relying heavily on community resources. Dell CloudIQ simplifies deployment with a cloud-based model and offers professional support services, suitable for organizations needing ongoing assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core, being open-source, has a low initial cost, drawing budget-conscious buyers, though ROI depends on deployment complexity and additional module investments. Dell CloudIQ, with a subscription fee, provides extensive features aiming for operational efficiency and downtime reduction, potentially leading to higher ROI through better infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Core

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Has proactive monitoring with predictive insights and a user-friendly interface

Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually. It provides a status with traffic light colors, where red indicates danger, yellow means attention is needed, and green represents normal conditions to easily understand the health of the environment. The quick overview aids in decision-making. Additionally, CloudIQ's predictive capabilities, which are enhanced by artificial intelligence, have improved operational efficiency by providing proactive information to prevent issues before they arise.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

"Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

"The dashboard is clear and user-friendly."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"Monitoring with Nagios Core is helpful because it provides immediate alerts if something goes down, such as a server, or wireless router, or if there's a cable break. This allows us to respond promptly to any issues."

"Nagios Core is stable."

"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."

"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."

"Key features include the GUI interface, its notification capabilities, and the real-time reporting."

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

"We use the product to monitor server applications."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"The main limitation of CloudIQ is that it is intended to be used exclusively with Dell hardware."

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."

"The process of upgrading could be streamlined."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."

"There is a need for improvement in predictive maintenance, which I assume is somewhat AI-driven."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

"There is room for improvement in the graphics."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"The user interface could be more interactive because it is pretty basic."

"The mapping is a little hard."

"I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future."

"I would like to see a sensor that shows the traffic of a user and what they're doing on the network."

"The tool needs to improve the integrations."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

"It's free."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I use it for monitoring environment security today. I look at security, capacity, and availability in our environment.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Dell CloudIQ?

I would rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 28% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 25% of the time

NetApp Cloud Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 8% of the time

OpsRamp vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 7% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 12% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Nagios Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2025

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

June 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Overview

CloudIQ is a no cost Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offering that provides a simple monitoring interface for an unlimited number of Unity systems. CloudIQ accesses data in near real time to enable monitoring and troubleshooting for Unity systems.

Dell Technologies

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

North Carolina State University

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core

June 2025

Free Report: Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell CloudIQ vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.