We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SAP Customer Data Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task."
"We know when passwords will be expiring so we can force users to change their passwords, as well as requiring specific password requirements for length, complexity, etc."
"Our go-to solution for securing against the pass the hash attack vector and auditing privileged account usage."
"We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application."
"It is a robust product."
"Creating policies and the password rotation feature have been valuable. We don't have to memorize our password for the ADM account."
"The product is an important security measure against credential theft. It ensures session isolation and password rotation including pushing passwords to the endpoints."
"We can make a policy that affects everybody instantly."
"SAP CDC is very easy to use and the best part about this tool is its documentation."
"The initial setup was a bit complex."
"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."
"The scalability, sometimes, is lacking. It works really well for more static environments... But for an environment where you're constantly spinning up new infrastructure or new endpoints, sometimes it has a hard time keeping up."
"Overall what I would really love to see is the third-party PAS reporter tool pulled more into the overall solution, ideally as its own deployable component service installation package."
"We'd like to see the creation of some kind of memo field for each device account, which could be used, in our network at least, to leave a note about the device for either the security or network engineering team members."
"More than the product itself, there is room for improvement in the documentation. The documentation should be very detailed and very structured. It has a lot of good information, on one level, but I feel that it could be more elaborate and more structured."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"The solution needs better features for end users to manage their own whitelisting for API retrieval."
"I have struggled to give different access to different users in the same application."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while SAP Customer Data Cloud is ranked 2nd in Social Login. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while SAP Customer Data Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Customer Data Cloud writes "Enables us to sell products which creates significant revenue but their disaster recovery needs improvement". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas SAP Customer Data Cloud is most compared with Auth0, SAP Identity Management, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock and Symantec VIP Access Manager.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.