CyberArk Identity vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service comparison

The compared CyberArk and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. CyberArk is ranked #6 in CIaA , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 3.5% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #19 in IAMS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

3,175 Views
413 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Read 8 Oracle Identity Cloud Service reviews

502 Views
467 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Oracle Identity Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

July 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (8th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (6th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (8th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Identity is designed for Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and holds a mindshare of 3.5%, down 3.7% compared to last year.
Oracle Identity Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS), holds 1.1% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Identity	3.5%
Auth0 Platform	15.2%
Okta Platform	13.9%
Other	67.4%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Identity Cloud Service	1.1%
Microsoft Entra ID	20.3%
Google Cloud Identity	12.3%
Other	66.3%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

Amimesh Anand

Senior Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Offers single sign-on capabilities to users

Suppose you are totally dependent and have requirements where you have a cloud application or several applications for integration with the cloud. In that case, I will suggest the use of Oracle Identity Cloud Service. Oracle Identity Cloud Service has much scope for customization. If you have a high customization level, then I would suggest IAM. The tool's multifactor authentication capabilities are easy to implement. If a client has a banking system, they need a strong authentication service, and only a password is not required; the user has to authenticate via fingerprint, face recognition, or go for or any RSA token. Double authentication is required where the banking department has access to very critical applications, or else they cannot go ahead and give the password. It is very difficult to hack once you have MFA in place. You have to either give the print fingerprint or any RSA token, making it not so easy to hack the system. We suggest MFA to clients who have the most critical application with them. I recommend the tool for every client we have, but it depends on how they want to have it because some customers don't want to go for the cloud application, and they might be thinking about changing the cloud vendors. Suppose a company has some costs in mind, and if they have a large number of employees, like 50,000 or 1,00,000 users, then it will be costlier for them than having an on-prem tool, like IAM. If a customer has 5,000, 10,000, or 20,00 employees, Oracle Identity Cloud Service can be a cheaper tool than the IAM product. I will suggest Oracle Identity Cloud Service only for smaller organizations. The tool does not have any AI capabilities. I would recommend the tool to everyone. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."

"The best features in CyberArk Identity that I appreciate most are the recent updates that have added features in the cloud privilege environment."

"CyberArk Identity's ability to safeguard financial services infrastructure is good."

"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."

"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."

"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."

"It has aided in troubleshooting by allowing logs to be extracted and sent to a correlation engine, such as QRadar, for notifications or alerts."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"Federation and Identity let us create users and send federation tools, giving the authentication and authorization to users. With the on-premise solution, I can do the installation, configuration, and integration of Identity Access Management. This gives us direct access. The integration with the single solution E-business suite is also very valuable."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its single sign-on capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is identity management."

"Identity Cloud has simplified our migrations. Since we're primarily working with native Oracle solutions, we can adopt many features of Oracle Identity Cloud Management."

"The most valuable features are the high stability and good performance."

"The most valuable feature is the reduced maintenance burden for the client."

"The APIs are well documented, which has allowed us to access the IDCS security applications in our custom APIs."

"Onboarding of new employees, consultants, and partners has rapidly increased. We reduced the time to onboard them and the ease of onboarding has been improved. Therefore, we recognize there has been efficiency which has been brought into our organization."

Cons

"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated."

"Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management."

"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."

"I faced some challenges during the initial setup of CyberArk Identity. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components."

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"The tool doesn't have many out-of-the-box connectors for the target integration."

"The IDs that are not used for a particular number of days should be disabled automatically."

"The initial setup was a little complex. At that time, the method of integration was a bit complicated due to the scripts that we were required to write for the integration."

"The cost of this solution should be reduced."

"Oracle needs to improve the GUI and many other aspects of the cloud console. It isn't as slick as Azure, Google, or IWS cloud. The documentation could be better, too."

"We still see a lot of bugs in any of the versions that Oracle comes out with. So, there are a lot of bugs that need to be fixed."

"The protocol could be easier to use."

"Self Service features are still limited in IDCS, and there is a need for more customization of the self-service screens."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The foundation tier that is offered with other cloud services subscriptions is fairly extensive and supports the use of identities, groups, and privileges in those cloud services."

"The tool's implementation costs totally depend on the number of users. The cost depends on how many users are going to use it, so a per-user cost model is needed for the tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

The tool's implementation costs totally depend on the number of users. The cost depends on how many users are going to use it, so a per-user cost model is needed for the tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

The tool doesn't have many out-of-the-box connectors for the target integration. The connectors are very small and don't have much customization scope. If we talk about the IAM tool from Oracle, it...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

I use the solution in my company as it is the same version of the tools' IAM product but on the cloud. If we look at IAM before, there is AAM, which is adaptive access management, which was discont...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 12% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Okta Platform vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 29% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 26% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 19% of the time

More Oracle Identity Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

December 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

November 2025

Download Oracle Identity Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Oracle Identity Cloud Service enables organizations to automate security, compliance, and IDM activities regardless of where they are on their journey to the cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Valuecube, Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, Ricoh

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

July 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service report.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.