CyberArk Identity vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service comparison

The compared CyberArk and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. CyberArk is ranked #6 in CIaA , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.8% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #20 in IAMS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 28 CyberArk Identity reviews

2,972 Views
327 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Read 8 Oracle Identity Cloud Service reviews

381 Views
347 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Oracle Identity Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

July 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (10th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (5th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Identity is designed for Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and holds a mindshare of 3.8%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
Oracle Identity Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS), holds 0.8% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk Identity	3.8%
Auth0	19.8%
Ping Identity Platform	11.9%
Other	64.5%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Identity Cloud Service	0.8%
Microsoft Entra ID	24.2%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	12.6%
Other	62.4%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Amimesh Anand

Senior Architect at Cognizant

Offers single sign-on capabilities to users

Suppose you are totally dependent and have requirements where you have a cloud application or several applications for integration with the cloud. In that case, I will suggest the use of Oracle Identity Cloud Service. Oracle Identity Cloud Service has much scope for customization. If you have a high customization level, then I would suggest IAM. The tool's multifactor authentication capabilities are easy to implement. If a client has a banking system, they need a strong authentication service, and only a password is not required; the user has to authenticate via fingerprint, face recognition, or go for or any RSA token. Double authentication is required where the banking department has access to very critical applications, or else they cannot go ahead and give the password. It is very difficult to hack once you have MFA in place. You have to either give the print fingerprint or any RSA token, making it not so easy to hack the system. We suggest MFA to clients who have the most critical application with them. I recommend the tool for every client we have, but it depends on how they want to have it because some customers don't want to go for the cloud application, and they might be thinking about changing the cloud vendors. Suppose a company has some costs in mind, and if they have a large number of employees, like 50,000 or 1,00,000 users, then it will be costlier for them than having an on-prem tool, like IAM. If a customer has 5,000, 10,000, or 20,00 employees, Oracle Identity Cloud Service can be a cheaper tool than the IAM product. I will suggest Oracle Identity Cloud Service only for smaller organizations. The tool does not have any AI capabilities. I would recommend the tool to everyone. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."

"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."

"CyberArk Identity is at the top."

"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."

"What I like most about CyberArk Identity is the model that is in place."

"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"The features that I personally find most effective in terms of security stem from the fact that it is easy to integrate and also the adoption is faster."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"The most valuable features are the high stability and good performance."

"Identity Cloud has simplified our migrations. Since we're primarily working with native Oracle solutions, we can adopt many features of Oracle Identity Cloud Management."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its single sign-on capabilities."

"The APIs are well documented, which has allowed us to access the IDCS security applications in our custom APIs."

"The most valuable feature is the reduced maintenance burden for the client."

"Federation and Identity let us create users and send federation tools, giving the authentication and authorization to users. With the on-premise solution, I can do the installation, configuration, and integration of Identity Access Management. This gives us direct access. The integration with the single solution E-business suite is also very valuable."

"The most valuable feature is identity management."

"Onboarding of new employees, consultants, and partners has rapidly increased. We reduced the time to onboard them and the ease of onboarding has been improved. Therefore, we recognize there has been efficiency which has been brought into our organization."

Cons

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process. The translation isn't always good, and it may have a completely different name. I've noticed this in the English to Spanish translation."

"At the moment CyberArk needs to enrich Conjur and it needs to be made more viable so that its adoption can be made much faster."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team. Sometimes, there is a delay in handling my inquiries via email, which could be addressed for better service."

"The user interface could be improved."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"The protocol could be easier to use."

"Oracle needs to improve the GUI and many other aspects of the cloud console. It isn't as slick as Azure, Google, or IWS cloud. The documentation could be better, too."

"We still see a lot of bugs in any of the versions that Oracle comes out with. So, there are a lot of bugs that need to be fixed."

"The cost of this solution should be reduced."

"The tool doesn't have many out-of-the-box connectors for the target integration."

"Self Service features are still limited in IDCS, and there is a need for more customization of the self-service screens."

"The initial setup was a little complex. At that time, the method of integration was a bit complicated due to the scripts that we were required to write for the integration."

"The IDs that are not used for a particular number of days should be disabled automatically."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"The foundation tier that is offered with other cloud services subscriptions is fairly extensive and supports the use of identities, groups, and privileges in those cloud services."

"The tool's implementation costs totally depend on the number of users. The cost depends on how many users are going to use it, so a per-user cost model is needed for the tool."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated. While I would rate CyberArk Identity and Okta on the same level, Okta's reporting is crisper and clearer. For CyberArk Identity, you need knowle...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

The tool's implementation costs totally depend on the number of users. The cost depends on how many users are going to use it, so a per-user cost model is needed for the tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

The tool doesn't have many out-of-the-box connectors for the target integration. The connectors are very small and don't have much customization scope. If we talk about the IAM tool from Oracle, it...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Identity Cloud Service?

I use the solution in my company as it is the same version of the tools' IAM product but on the cloud. If we look at IAM before, there is AAM, which is adaptive access management, which was discont...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 19% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 36% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 36% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Compared 28% of the time

More Oracle Identity Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

September 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

August 2025

Download Oracle Identity Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Oracle Identity Cloud Service enables organizations to automate security, compliance, and IDM activities regardless of where they are on their journey to the cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Valuecube, Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, Ricoh

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

July 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Identity Cloud Service report.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.