We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Oracle Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"If anyone makes an error, or if an incident occurs by accident, the business will not be harmed as a result of this activity."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."
"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."
"More integrations would be better."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."
"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."
"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."
"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 5th in Access Management with 7 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 15th in Access Management with 4 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 9.2, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Easy to set up with powerful features and good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Reliable with good multi-factor authentification and good security". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, IBM Security Access Manager and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). See our CyberArk Identity vs. Oracle Access Manager report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
