OpenText Functional Testing and CrossBrowserTesting are competitive products in software testing. OpenText Functional Testing tends to lead in automation and integration, particularly in enterprise settings, whereas CrossBrowserTesting is preferred for its convenience in cross-platform testing.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides advanced test automation, seamless integration with enterprise tools, and script reuse, making it highly beneficial for complex IT environments. CrossBrowserTesting allows testing across a wide array of devices and browsers, offers video recordings and screenshots for bug tracking, and supports real-time web service testing, serving agile testing needs effectively.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could improve by streamlining its intricate setup process, better mobile testing integration, and reducing its dependency on high initial costs. CrossBrowserTesting could enhance its capabilities by expanding its automation frameworks, improving load testing features, and offering more advanced integration with CI/CD tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing requires a more complex setup suitable for well-structured enterprise environments and provides comprehensive support. CrossBrowserTesting, with its cloud-based deployment, offers easier setup and agile customer service solutions, promoting quick issue resolution for smaller, nimble teams.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing implies higher upfront costs but promises increased ROI through robust automation in enterprise-scale environments. CrossBrowserTesting presents a more flexible pricing model, offering immediate ROI for smaller and mid-sized teams, making it attractive for those prioritizing affordability.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.3% |
| CrossBrowserTesting | 1.5% |
| Other | 92.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
