Cortex Xpanse vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Ivanti is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.8. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Cortex Xpanse

Read 6 Cortex Xpanse reviews

2,103 Views
2,082 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Read 35 Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management reviews

7,317 Views
146 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cortex Xpanse

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Cortex Xpanse and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in the cybersecurity sector, with Cortex Xpanse excelling in data visibility and threat detection, while Ivanti is strong in system integration and data analytics.

Features: Cortex Xpanse provides extensive internet-connected asset visibility, automated risk prioritization, and threat intelligence. It excels in threat identification and global asset mapping. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management features robust integration capabilities, seamless endpoint security, and efficient configuration management. It offers advanced automation and comprehensive device management.

Room for Improvement: Cortex Xpanse could enhance its integration capabilities, user interface intuitiveness, and reporting customization. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management could improve onboarding processes, enhance user training resources, and expand its analytics functions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti offers streamlined deployment and robust support with customization options. It is adaptable across varied environments. Cortex Xpanse focuses on rapid asset identification and onboarding, supported by strong customer service, ensuring quick implementation with substantial setup assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Cortex Xpanse has a higher entry cost but offers significant ROI through advanced risk mitigation and asset management. Ivanti presents a moderate pricing scheme that achieves ROI via automation savings and management efficiency. Cortex Xpanse shows value in asset risk assessment, while Ivanti provides returns through operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Attack Surface Management (ASM) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex Xpanse

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (8th), Vulnerability Management (25th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (5th), Mobile Threat Defense (5th), Patch Management (5th), Cloud Cost Management (19th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (8th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (4th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1442496

System Administrator at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Ensures robust security management with seamless integration

We work with the cloud version of Cortex Xpanse. We are working with Palo Alto products right at the moment. We have Cortex and GlobalProtect that we are using. I'm not sure if we utilize Cortex Xpanse's capability to identify internet-facing assets. I'm not sure about the automated threat assessment of Cortex helping prioritize vulnerabilities. I would assess the integration capabilities of Cortex Xpanse as good; no issues so far with integration with other tools from different vendors. Cortex Xpanse supports our organization's regulatory compliance efforts 100%, and it's what we need from it. Right now, I am working only with Palo Alto for security. I am not planning to work with some other vendors. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Cortex Xpanse a nine.

Read full review

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of the product is that it's easy to manage when we have set it up, and the beneficial impact of Cortex Xpanse for the company is security."

"When there is an alert from Cortex Xpanse regarding a certificate or surface, it prompts us to take immediate action."

"As an attack surface manager, I highly recommend Cortex Xpanse, especially if there are many services exposed publicly on the internet."

"Cortex Xpanse is a strong solution for attack surface management, including digital brand protection and continuous monitoring."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its firewall and antivirus."

"Cortex Xpanse has an easy-to-use user interface."

"The most valuable aspect is its ability to catch trojans and malware."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has had a significant positive impact on my organization, particularly in reducing manual endpoint management efforts and moving from reactive support to proactive remediation."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is a great tool for managing our team and company assets."

"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."

"I experience every day how the unified platform has really optimized IT and security operations processes since patch management automatically patches the vulnerabilities."

"The technical support from Ivanti is good."

"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."

"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

Cons

"Some improvements are needed in the user interface. It may require more enhancements."

"There is an issue with the old versions of Cortex, and so when we have an older one with Windows or any OS, we have a problem with its connectivity with the cloud."

"Cortex Xpanse should offer better customization and configuration options on its dashboard."

"Regarding technical support, I would rate it as a seven."

"It's challenging to confirm the absolute coverage and penetration of Cortex Xpanse into the Dark Web. The solution lacks comprehensive intelligence on adversaries and risks, which other competitors might provide."

"Cortex Xpanse needs to add dark-web scanning."

"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."

"Customer support is really poor."

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

"Sometimes there is a lag with the environment, and we need to refresh before using it."

"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."

"The MDM, asset management, and software spend management are areas that could have more improvement in Ivanti Neurons for MDM."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's cost is too high."

"Cortex Xpanse is cheaper than other solutions."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is affordable."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex Xpanse?

I don't know the licensing or setup cost; I have no idea about the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex Xpanse?

I'm not sure right now; I have nothing to comment on regarding what could be improved in the product. We are using it and we are satisfied. I have nothing to comment right now on what other feature...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cortex Xpanse?

Cortex Xpanse is usually used for security from clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing involves knowing that when deploying the project, we provide a cost for the tasks, which includes an assigned license. We deploy the license an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Ivanti Neurons for UEM serves as our main solution for utilizing EPM for Endpoint Manager to manage endpoints, obtain inventory data, push software, and conduct patch analysis. We also use UE and E...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyCognito vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Attack Surface Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 11% of the time

Bitsight vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 10% of the time

Censys Attack Surface Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 7% of the time

Mandiant Advantage vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 6% of the time

More Cortex Xpanse Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 7% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

August 2026

Download Cortex Xpanse product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

August 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

Ivanti

Overview

Cortex Xpanse offers comprehensive security by identifying trojans, malware, and unknown exposed assets while providing digital brand protection and monitoring, benefiting organizations of all sizes.

Cortex Xpanse provides robust threat detection and management with features like real-time reporting and asset discovery. Its antivirus and firewall enhance security, while dark web monitoring facilitates swift action on vulnerabilities and certificates. However, improvements in cloud connectivity and dark web scanning are needed. Enterprises, especially those with Security Operations Centers, find it useful for its installation ease, device control, and security measures, despite firewall complexity.

What are key features of Cortex Xpanse?

Digital Brand Protection: Shields the organization's digital brand from threats.
Continuous Monitoring: Observes activities for quick threat detection.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides timely security insights through user-friendly interfaces.
Asset Discovery: Identifies vulnerable assets for proactive management.
Firewall and Antivirus: Strengthens overall security posture.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Proactive Threat Management: Allows organizations to react swiftly to emerging threats.
Ease of Installation: Supports seamless deployment across networks.
Comprehensive Device Control: Ensures effective management and monitoring of devices.
Actionable Vulnerability Insights: Enhances security decision-making processes.

Cortex Xpanse is predominantly applied in large enterprises for safeguarding applications and databases against ransomware and malware. Organizations with Security Operations Centers leverage its customizable policies for client security and vulnerability remediation. It aids in managing attack surfaces as a proactive security strategy.

Palo Alto Networks

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Frontier Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about TrendAI, CrowdStrike, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.