CoreStack vs Spot comparison

CoreStack and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. CoreStack is ranked #41, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. CoreStack holds a 1.2% mindshare in CCM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CoreStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

CoreStack

Read 3 CoreStack reviews

197 Views
197 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spot

Read 3 Spot reviews

1,388 Views
708 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CoreStack

Spot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

CoreStack and Spot compete in the cloud management space, each providing distinct capabilities for optimized infrastructure operations. Spot is perceived as superior in dynamic resource allocation and auto-scaling, while CoreStack offers more favorable terms in support and pricing.

Features: CoreStack's most valuable features include comprehensive compliance checks, mature cloud governance tools, and competitive setup costs. Spot focuses on automatic cost optimization, serverless computing capacities, and advanced automation features. CoreStack emphasizes governance focus, whereas Spot enhances automation and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreStack provides a straightforward deployment model with extensive customer service options for efficient implementation. Spot has an intuitive setup process that may require more initial configuration but benefits from responsive support channels. CoreStack focuses on ease and efficiency, and Spot offers a flexible, supportive approach.

Pricing and ROI: CoreStack appeals with competitive setup costs and clear ROI paths through improved governance and reduced compliance risk. Spot, despite higher initial expenses, ensures significant ROI through substantial cost savings and resource efficiency. The difference is between lower upfront costs with CoreStack and Spot's longer-term savings potential through automation.

To learn more, read our detailed CoreStack vs. Spot Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack vs. Spot

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CoreStack

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

41st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spot

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (32nd), Server Virtualization Software (15th), Cloud Operations Analytics (2nd), Cloud Analytics (4th), Compute Service (11th), Containers as a Service (CaaS) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CoreStack is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spot is 4.6%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Spot	4.6%
CoreStack	1.2%
Other	94.2%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2783919

Associate Vice President at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Cost reports have driven accurate AWS workload optimization and continue to guide savings

I can suggest improvements for CoreStack, especially regarding reporting periods. I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%. I have concerns about needed improvements primarily regarding AWS. If a customer is running ten virtual machines and one machine has a maximum of 1% utilization, it is considered as an idle instance in the report, which completely ignores that particular machine. This should not be the approach.

Read full review

reviewer2784786

Global Hyperscaler Alliances Director at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Cloud optimization has transformed our cost control and now drives efficient FinOps decisions

The best features that Spot offers include automated cost optimization, advanced container and Kubernetes management, and extensions to security as well as compliance, AI-driven insights, and multi-cloud integration, enabling organizations to work across different cloud environments and benefit any customer.Spot's automated cost optimization works by continuously analyzing the workload and applying policies to minimize cloud spend without sacrificing performance. Spot automatically chooses the most cost-effective mix of pricing models such as spot instances, reserved instances, savings plans, and on-demand based on real-time demand and availability. Spot has positively impacted our organization by automating cloud resource management, which has significantly cut costs and improved efficiency. We have seen up to 70 percent savings, as well as better scalability, reliability, and tighter integration with AWS. This integration has opened several doors to the partner ecosystem, different marketplaces, and has allowed us to leverage programs while tapping into the Amazon network and ecosystem more effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Mainly through improved cost visibility and optimization with CoreStack, we have achieved a good ROI, and for some customers we were able to achieve more than forty percent cost savings by identifying unused and idle resources in their accounts, leading to significant cost savings after we completed the cleanup of those resources."

"My advice for others looking into using CoreStack is that anyone who is looking to optimize their workload cost for public cloud services should start using CoreStack because of the reports and granularity it produces to optimize cost, which will benefit them."

"CoreStack has positively impacted my organization by saving hours of time for reporting—for example, the governance report which my employees used to take at least four hours for one customer, and since I'm sending out 20 reports every month, that equates to 80 hours, thus saving me two man-weeks every month and approximately $8,000 in pure savings if I estimate $100 an hour for my architect."

"Spot has positively impacted our organization by automating cloud resource management, which has significantly cut costs and improved efficiency."

"The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow."

"The solution offers both block access and file access, making it a nice solution for customers."

Cons

"I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%."

"I give it an eight because, as I mentioned, a few things from the billing operations need to be added, and we need more security features, particularly since the market is increasingly demanding better security tools for cloud management platforms, including cloud security posture assessments."

"I believe CoreStack already has very good features in the governance and security parts, but stability can definitely be improved."

"The solution doesn't have support from OCI, and it should start working to onboard OCI."

"There are no particular areas for improvement I can identify."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreStack?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty good because we received private pricing, which I cannot disclose. The setup was included as a one-time expense, and licensing is str...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreStack?

CoreStack can improve by adding a segregation of reserved instances that are shared across child accounts or managed accounts from the parent account, ensuring a cost allocation for all reserved in...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreStack?

My main use case for CoreStack is for cost optimization and billing operations, and I'm using it a bit for SecOps and CloudOps, but majorly for FinOps and BillOps. A specific example of how I use C...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spot Ocean?

The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spot Ocean?

Spot can be improved by adding deeper multi-cloud integrations, enhancing real-time security automation, and continuously making advancements based on customer feedback.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spot Ocean?

I have been using Spot for five years. My main use case for Spot is cloud optimization.We use Spot for optimization by leveraging real-time optimization as well as auto-optimization. The company al...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudCheckr vs CoreStack

Compared 50% of the time

More CoreStack Competitors

IBM Turbonomic vs Spot

Compared 16% of the time

ProsperOps vs Spot

Compared 9% of the time

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs Spot

Compared 8% of the time

Pump.co vs Spot

Compared 7% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs Spot

Compared 6% of the time

More Spot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download CoreStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Analytics

December 2025

Download Spot product report

Also Known As

No data available

Spot Ocean, Spot Elastigroup, Spot Eco

Overview

CoreStack® Enterprise Enables You to be agile and eliminate waste while proactively mitigating risks by making your cloud governance intelligent and autonomous. It applies Cloud-as-Code™ approach to govern the four critical components of your cloud

CoreStack

Spot provides dynamic workload management for cloud environments, offering cost optimization and enhanced performance. It stands out with its unique approach to managing resources efficiently.

Spot is designed to enhance cloud resource utilization and cost-effectiveness through intelligent workload management. With real-time analysis, Spot determines and deploys the most efficient resources, ensuring optimal performance for applications. Businesses benefit from reduced cloud expenses and increased operational efficiency, making it an essential tool for managing cloud infrastructure effectively.

What are the key features of Spot?

Automated Scaling: Automatically adjusts cloud resources based on demand and usage patterns.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight to ensure optimal performance and operational efficiency.
Cost Optimization: Reduces expenses by utilizing spot instances and leveraging cost-effective cloud resources.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing cloud services and infrastructures.

What benefits should users look for in Spot?

Cost Reduction: Users can expect to see a significant decrease in cloud expenses.
Improved Efficiency: Enhancements in operational processes and workload management.
Resource Optimization: Better allocation and usage of cloud resources.
Scalability: Capability to handle increasing amounts of work effectively.

In finance, Spot ensures cost-effective cloud computing for trading platforms, while in e-commerce, it dynamically manages back-end processes. In the entertainment industry, Spot optimizes media streaming by deploying resources when user demand spikes. Each industry leverages Spot to maximize performance and minimize operational costs, demonstrating its versatility and reliability across sectors.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

CAMS

Freshworks, Zalando, Red Spark, News, Trax, ETAS, Demandbase, BeesWa, Duolingo, intel, IBM, N26, Wix, EyeEm, moovit, SAMSUNG, News UK, ticketmaster

Buyer's Guide

CoreStack vs. Spot

December 2025

Free Report: CoreStack vs. Spot

Find out what your peers are saying about CoreStack vs. Spot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CoreStack vs. Spot report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.