Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Corelight and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category. Corelight is ranked #6, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Corelight holds a 9.8% mindshare in NTA, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Corelight users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Corelight

Read 5 Corelight reviews

2,127 Views
1,531 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

994 Views
348 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Corelight

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Corelight and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are leading network detection and response solutions. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior deployment capabilities.

Features: Corelight offers robust open-source integration, effective threat detection capabilities, and cost-effective setup. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides advanced anomaly detection, extensive cloud compatibility, and comprehensive features for large-scale operations.

Room for Improvement: Corelight needs better documentation, expanded integration options, and more user resources. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 could simplify its configuration, enhance its alerting system, and improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Corelight is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is favored for its ease of deployment, especially in hybrid environments, and excellent customer service, with its wide-ranging deployment capabilities providing a slight edge.

Pricing and ROI: Corelight has lower initial costs and affordable subscriptions, yielding positive ROI. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is more expensive, but its enhanced capabilities justify the higher cost, providing greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Corelight

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (13th)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (20th), Container Security (30th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category, the mindshare of Corelight is 9.8%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 3.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Corelight	9.8%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	3.6%
Other	86.6%

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

HamadaElewa

Technical Sales Manager at Spire Solutions

An expensive solution to monitor internet traffic with multiple dashboards

The huge library especially the open source link, makes it the main engine for Corelight with some enhancements in the commercial version. It has a very powerful level, such as signature-based attacks or behavioral attacks, with enhancements in the design. It is very flexible for intelligent implementations like IPs, especially between big companies and banks. Corelight is easy to understand and monitor what is going on behind the team. The solution is already integrated with other systems like Suricata, Elastic, and Microsoft tools. It's very easy to integrate signature-based or behavior-based engines. You can use Elastic for the dashboards to get it from Corelight, along with all the benefits and expandability.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."

"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."

"Corelight is easy to use."

"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."

"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It is scalable."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

Cons

"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."

"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."

"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."

"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."

"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"There needs to be more support."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly fee and depends on what you are looking for."

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?

The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Corelight?

It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Corelight?

The solution is too expensive compared to others. If you have the technical knowledge, it's good. Corelight is a very big gap between you and others if you’re new.

See all answers

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vectra AI vs Corelight

Compared 31% of the time

Darktrace vs Corelight

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Corelight

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Corelight

Compared 6% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs Corelight

Compared 5% of the time

More Corelight Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 25% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 16% of the time

Darktrace vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

August 2025

Download Corelight product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

August 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Corelight is the most powerful network visibility solution for information security professionals. We provide real-time data that organizations use to understand, detect, and prevent cyber attacks. Our solution is built on Zeek, the powerful and widely-used open source monitoring framework.

Corelight

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Education First

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

July 2025

Free Report: Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Corelight vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.

We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.