Coralogix vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

Coralogix and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Coralogix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. Coralogix holds a 0.4% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,603 Views
390 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews

2,541 Views
2,414 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Coralogix

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and Coralogix compete in the enterprise security management category. OpenText appears to have an edge with its scalability and extensive feature set, while Coralogix is favored for its user-friendly interface and effective analytics.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers powerful integration capabilities, comprehensive device support, and real-time event correlation, making it suitable for complex security environments. Coralogix provides a modern platform with real-time monitoring and strong analytics, designed for ease of use and operational simplicity.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its reporting features, integration capabilities, and technical support to streamline user experience. Coralogix may benefit from better AI features, improved user interface intuitiveness, and more comprehensive documentation for maximizing its utilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is generally deployed in on-premises or hybrid cloud environments, providing deep customization but has mixed reviews on customer support. Coralogix is cloud-based with easier deployment and generally praised responsive support, though improvements in support details and speed are suggested.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText's pricing is considered high, especially for large deployments, but value comes from its rich feature set. Coralogix presents a cost-effective solution for smaller requirements but may become expensive as usage scales. It offers competitive pricing suitable for dynamic businesses with efficient usability.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (22nd), Log Management (21st), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (13th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Gaurav Ranade

CTO at Rah Infotech Pvt Ltd

Excels at performing regression and correlation on the data

ArcSight is a legacy technology, and many customers want AI-powered technologies integrated with it. That hasn't been done yet, but ArcSight needs to catch up with the newer solutions and technologies available in the market. It can't just rely on the legacy technology from 2010 or 2012. You can't run that in 2024. It's a legacy technology with its own limitations. Customers often face issues that other software or newer solutions can resolve easily. That's the main challenge we face from customers right now. So, the only concerns are that AI needs to be integrated and scalability improved. Those are the main areas to be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"The out-of-the-box rules that help us configure functioning rules within the environment are valuable."

"We have been satisfied with the support."

"Once the rules are defined, it is capable of detecting minute changes in the systems, which are effectively based on the entries in the log."

"What I found most valuable in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its good integration with third-party products. The solution also has good core capabilities."

"Some of the benefits of using this solution are rapid correlation and near-time response on alerts."

"We do consulting and I get feedback from our clients that the product really helped them with compliance, especially with GDPR."

"The most useful features are directories, price, and live reporting."

"The most valuable features of ArcSight ESM are ease of use and readily usable components."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros

Cons

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

More Coralogix cons

"The visualization is not very good compared to Splunk."

"ArcSight ESM could improve by adding more features and documentation. There needs to be more documentation."

"What could be improved in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its analytics feature. That feature should be more powerful and have more correlation in terms of AI/ML, though MicroFocus has done a good job in adding analytics to ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) which has become a big draw to customers. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the addition of AI/ML features."

"ArcSight ESM is lacking cloud scalable technology."

"Customer service during the transition from HPE to Micro Focus was abysmal where it became disruptive to our service delivery."

"I am having issues with report generation with older versions. I don't know if this is because of compatibility issues, but report generation has been a little bit difficult in older versions. It is not similar to the newer and current versions. We are looking at moving to the cloud. It would be good if ArcSight ESM can move to the cloud. They already seem to be working on this. It would also be very helpful and great if we can integrate external threat intelligence, machine learning, and AI into this solution. It has good dashboards, but they can always be better. Its stability can also be improved."

"The correlation engine effectively connects different events, significantly improving our detection reach. However, limitations exist with non-default alerts, where additional costs arise for integration."

"The onboarding process for this solution could be better. It also needs a better GUI."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."

"Thanks to Micro Focus's licensing model, as an MSSP, we are able to see a complete return on our investment almost immediately."

"It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."

"The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive."

"It is best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team, as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders."

"The solution is super expensive. At our organization size and license model, I think the price is average to what anyone else would charge us."

"The pricing is great compared to others."

"HPE ArcSight pricing might be more expensive than other SIEM solutions, but in my opinion it has powerful features and great flexibility in developing complex use cases."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 25% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 6% of the time

SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

August 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

August 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report

Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.

Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

July 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.