ConnectWise SIEM vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

ConnectWise and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. ConnectWise is ranked #54 with an average rating of 6.0, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.1. ConnectWise holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

ConnectWise SIEM

Read 3 ConnectWise SIEM reviews

1,661 Views
565 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 24 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,992 Views
1,972 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ConnectWise SIEM

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response and ConnectWise SIEM are both highly regarded tools in the cybersecurity marketplace. Trellix EDR stands out for its ease of use and robust support, whereas ConnectWise SIEM takes an upper hand with its comprehensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Trellix EDR is valued for its threat detection, automated response capabilities, and the efficiency it brings to security teams. ConnectWise SIEM has extensive integrations, real-time monitoring features, and scalability. Users note its customizability, adding to its feature completeness over Trellix EDR.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR can improve in reporting and alert accuracy, with some seeking more detailed analytics. ConnectWise SIEM users prefer a more intuitive configuration process, enhanced customer support experience, and fewer setup issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. ConnectWise SIEM offers a more complex deployment, but the robust support system offsets initial setup issues. Trellix's easier use and faster implementation time are strong points against ConnectWise's intricate setup.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR offers competitive pricing with good ROI due to its effective protection mechanisms. ConnectWise SIEM is more expensive initially but is considered worth the investment for its long-term benefits and comprehensive features. Users favoring ROI tend to prefer ConnectWise SIEM despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ConnectWise SIEM

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

54th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (50th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (22nd), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (25th)

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of ConnectWise SIEM is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	1.1%
ConnectWise SIEM	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2711757

Cyber Security Software Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Automated alerting and reporting excel while cost and feature limitations remain

I find automation to be one of the best and most valuable features of the product. Machine learning is incorporated into the solution, though AI is a broader term that I wouldn't apply here. I haven't personally explored AI yet, but I will investigate it. Machine learning functions more as automation in my experience, as there's no training involved yet. I want to conduct R&D on another project with Wazuh to determine how to capture usage, for example, tracking user logins and time spent. This is where I need to implement machine learning. Additionally, the extraction of GeoIP adds complexity. The solution is effectively reducing incident response times in operations.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee Of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Cross-site threat hunting has improved visibility and supports proactive incident response

I believe this is a product in evolution. I do not think it is a final tool to conduct forensics or information forensics of the incidents or information incidents that could arise in our network infrastructure. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is interesting and is a very good entry point that has been evolving through the last years. In the next two months, I have a new contract, and we are pointing out to have an XDR solution with NDR and EDR together. I do not have enough time to do it because I am the manager. However, my coworkers do not understand it yet. I have a contract with a third-party company that is making reports around that, but also they do not have enough experience or enough utility of this. It would be interesting if I have a notification system from EDR. For example, if I am the manager, it would be interesting to have a warning, alarm, or something around that which could call me to get into the system and the dashboard to see what is happening. For example, if it is a high-level threat. However, most of them are just advisory or warnings. I do not enter the tool frequently. I guess I access it once every three months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One valuable feature of ConnectWise Fortify is the ability to add other teams and receive notifications when customers make changes or remove multi-factor authentication in Microsoft or SAP environments."

"The integration capabilities of ConnectWise SIEM are off the shelf, making it easy to buy and use; you just unpack it and use it."

"We have found the solution has great functionality and it is easy to use."

"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The product and the services we have are quite good."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"Blocking browser navigation is a feature of the solution with which we have experienced success."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"The product's initial setup phase was very straightforward since you just need to install it, and it works."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"ConnectWise Fortify could work on covering more areas, like phishing messages, which have become more complicated to detect."

"The manage portion of the solution is complicated and should be simplified by having different versions to meet the needs of different size companies."

"ConnectWise SIEM is primarily focused on notifications and is limited in that aspect, while Wazuh can automate the elimination process."

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"The technical support must be improved."

"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

"When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"The price is reasonable."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ConnectWise Fortify?

I haven't utilized the advanced threat intelligence capabilities with ConnectWise SIEM. Advanced threat intelligence is an option, but I haven't explored this feature yet. The advanced threat intel...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ConnectWise Fortify?

I do not have experience with ConnectWise SIEM for RMM, as I mostly work on Wazuh, and I have a team that handles ConnectWise SIEM. I'm linking with them, serving as the bridge. I am solely working...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ConnectWise Fortify?

The review can be made anonymous if just my name and not the company name is used. I would assess the real-time visibility for my organization as somewhat real-time, but it's not fully real-time. T...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowa...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs ConnectWise SIEM

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs ConnectWise SIEM

Compared 6% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs ConnectWise SIEM

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs ConnectWise SIEM

Compared 5% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs ConnectWise SIEM

Compared 5% of the time

More ConnectWise SIEM Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 32% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download ConnectWise SIEM product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2026

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

ConnectWise Security Management, ConnectWise Fortify, Continuum Fortify, ConnectWise SIEM, ConnectWise SASE

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

IT solution providers are the first—and often only—line of defense for every kind of business in every part of the world. Whether managing mom-and-pop businesses or high-profile clients, providing preventive security measures is a must-have in today’s cybersecurity landscape. Security information and event management (SIEM) solutions offer an additional layer of security for your clients; however, most SIEM solutions are routinely difficult to manage, expensive to deploy, and require a significant amount of in-house cybersecurity expertise.

ConnectWise SIEM offers a powerful alternative to expand your security perspective to both prevention and detection. The solution includes comprehensive, flexible SIEM software that streamlines safety and security across your network without additional full-time employee costs or complicated implementations.

ConnectWise

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Techvera, Syrex, Clark Integrated Technologies

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Free Report: ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.