No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) vs Ironclad comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Contract Management Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Product Configuration and Quoting (6th)
Ironclad
Ranking in Contract Management Software
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
eSignature (Electronic Signature) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Contract Management Software category, the mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 3.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ironclad is 4.1%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ironclad4.1%
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)3.7%
Other92.2%
Contract Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
Stephane Muller - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, Contract Management Team at Amadeus
Automated NDA workflows have streamlined contract drafting and approvals for my team
The best features Ironclad offers are that it is very easy to use and very easy to customize; you do not need to be a developer to customize it and to create your own workflows. When I say it is easy to customize, I mean creating the questions and creating the conditions in the template. For example, if you have different businesses and depending on the type of business, you want to customize a document such as an NDA, it is quite easy to do it by yourself inside Ironclad. Ironclad has impacted my organization positively because it is more efficient, allowing us to spend less time on easy tasks and therefore spend more time on more complex tasks. I would estimate 15 to 20% time saved on our side indicates the efficiency gains.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"By using Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), the time it takes to manage a contract, from contract creation to signature, is significantly reduced."
"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of efficiency and visibility."
"Because of these processes, the customer can send out thousands of contracts in one go instead of creating them and having a lot of people appointed to do this job, and it is a one-person job now."
"The main benefits I have seen from using Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) are that we use it as a discount platform in a huge project for different customers or accounts across the world."
"The best features Ironclad offers are that it is very easy to use and very easy to customize; you do not need to be a developer to customize it and to create your own workflows."
 

Cons

"Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has too much customization, making it not that easy to scale it up and scale it out."
"One challenge is the initial setup and configuration, especially for complex workflows and approval hierarchies."
"The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types."
"Sometimes their support is not very efficient."
"Ironclad can be improved by integrating with artificial intelligence; it does already, but it is not really useful at the moment as it has many bugs and a lot of inaccuracy."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Healthcare Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Because it was all customer-driven, I am not even sure about the pricing and the setup cost. For licensing of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), we had the Salesforce Ultimate subscription ...
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of temp...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
My main use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) involves a customer who has around 10 different record types. We work on getting the contract through the end-to-end contract lifecycl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ironclad?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was acceptable.
What needs improvement with Ironclad?
Ironclad can be improved by integrating with artificial intelligence; it does already, but it is not really useful at the moment as it has many bugs and a lot of inaccuracy. The AI integration is w...
What is your primary use case for Ironclad?
My main use case for Ironclad is drafting contracts, creating the first version of the contract, validating, approving the contract, and contract signature through the integration of DocuSign. For ...
 

Also Known As

The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix
Branch
Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.