No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Commvault Cloud vs Veeam Kasten comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 27, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Commvault Cloud
Ranking in Container Backup Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (4th), eDiscovery (1st), Cloud Backup (3rd), Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (6th), SaaS Backup (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (2nd)
Veeam Kasten
Ranking in Container Backup Software
1st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Singh Bisht - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Manager at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
Unified data protection has simplified hybrid backups and has improved ransomware recovery speed
Commvault Cloud's best feature in terms of protection is that it provides data protection and accomplishes its job effectively. It offers a unified approach to backup across all environments, including on-premises, public cloud, and SaaS applications such as M365 and Salesforce. I also use it for virtual machines and databases. The unified protection approach helps my team manage different environments effectively. Before Commvault Cloud, I used a separate VM backup tool to protect the VMware environment. For database backup, I had to use the native tool or backup scripts. For the cloud part, I had to use the native AWS or Azure cloud tools. After moving to Commvault Cloud, a single policy or a set of backup policies is applied across virtual machines, databases, workloads, and cloud workloads. I can protect my environments, which reduces manual configuration errors. Regarding visibility, it provides one dashboard to manage and centralize monitoring of all workloads. It is very easy to track backup success or failure. I can see the SLA compliance and storage usage without needing to jump between tools to check or have visibility of it. Regarding the recovery experience, the recovery time has been reduced drastically by using Commvault Cloud. It has simplified cloud management and provides easier manageability to manage retention policies, encryption policies, and compliance rules. This helps reduce operational workloads. Commvault Cloud has impacted me very positively. It simplifies and unifies data protection across hybrid workloads. Instead of managing multiple backup tools for virtual machines, databases, and SaaS applications, I now have a single platform with consistent policies and centralized visibility. This has really reduced my operational complexity and improved backup reliability. Regarding the cyber resiliency posture, the immutable backups and ransomware recovery workflow give me greater confidence in recovering quicker from potential risks. Commvault Cloud has positively impacted me in several key areas: unified backup management across environments, reduced operational overhead, improved ransomware resiliency, faster recovery times, better visibility for compliance, and easier management of hybrid or cloud workloads.
Shivamp Kachole - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
Automated backups have cut recovery time and protect Kubernetes workloads across hybrid clusters
Overall, I am happy with Veeam Kasten, but I think the multi-cluster management dashboard can be improved. When managing multiple Kubernetes clusters, it would be better if the backup jobs, policies, and alerts were available in one unified view. I also feel that the user interface can be made a bit more user-friendly, especially for quick filtering of backup jobs and restore points in a large environment. Other than that, I have not faced any major issues with it. One more important improvement I would like to suggest is better reporting and alerting. It would be helpful if backup failures and storage usage were more detailed in the dashboard without needing any external monitoring tool. Apart from that, the documentation is very good, and I have not faced any major issues with the installation or configuration integration with Kubernetes, OpenShift, or RKE2, and S3-compatible storage is straightforward. Overall, I am satisfied with the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud integration."
"We are using a KVM system in our cloud, and this solution works very well with it."
"We prefer Commvault because they are backup agents who have a vision about what we can do with applicable backup solutions."
"They have some really good features, they have really good engineering, and they have very good support."
"What I find valuable is restoring the complete server. Restoring files is also valuable, but I like restoring the server because you don't have to rebuild a new one."
"The granularity of the Office 365 Backup & Recovery feature is very good. We've used all of it, recovering data from each of the four systems that we back up with it, and it works very well."
"In summary, this is a unified product that is simple to use and a good backup solution."
"The user interface is very easy to navigate."
"The effectiveness of Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes in minimizing operational complexities is saving our lives."
"Now, with the scheduled backups and restore points, we can restore the complete application, including the namespace, PVs, PVCs, deployments, and services in around ten to twenty minutes."
"Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes is a very good backup solution; during times of DC/DR, whenever clusters or systems go down, I can use previously taken backups, and my DevOps team can integrate and migrate them, rebuilding my stopped cluster in less time, which reduces my downtime significantly."
 

Cons

"Commvault's price is quite high."
"Commvault could make the product more cost-effective on the public cloud side. We are using this solution to back up whatever is still on-prem. We are not using it to back up what is on the public cloud because we have a native backup solution for that, which is provided by the vendor. As our footprint gets bigger, we will continue to evaluate this, but the last time that we did a cost analysis, the cost was not comparable to the solution that public clouds are offering."
"I just wanted to compare the features, which are there in EMC NetWorker, which are not available in Commvault. We have things using Networker."
"You need quite a lot of human resources to maintain a Commvault environment, to keep it operational. Also, it would be nice to if there were an easier way set up some Commvault components."
"Technical support is helpful but it can take one or two weeks to sort out issues."
"I would like to see some of the code execute a little bit better when I add new licenses and assign licenses to users. I'd like to see that information update a little quicker."
"The setup is not that straightforward or easy. Even the documentation is not generic or public like other products. You have to be a partner or you have to have a specific account and download it from the vendor themselves."
"We get an alarm if a lot of files are deleted, for example. That could look like ransomware, even if it is not."
"Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes can improve its multi-cluster setup dashboard because the multi-cluster and single-cluster dashboards are the same."
"Overall, I am happy with Veeam Kasten, but I think the multi-cluster management dashboard can be improved."
"The stability part could be improved a little bit."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is worth the money."
"It is quite expensive when compared to other applications in the market. Its license is completely based on workload capacity. If I buy a license for 100 terabytes, I can back up anything. I can back up any platform, technology, or application, which is an advantage. Previously, we had to buy an agent for a particular application, and the cost was different for each agent. Now, the cost is completely based on the storage capacity. The license for one terabyte can cost around $1,700 for backing up anything from your environment."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"The solution is expensive. However, there are no additional costs involved. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing an eight."
"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
"One of the most interesting aspects is that the licensing model can be modified. We're paying for our licensing by the client, as opposed to the size of the footprint of the backup, which decreased our cost by about 20 percent."
"The solution is expensive, but it is worth the money."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Backup Software solutions are best for your needs.
919,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise82
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatWise?
Commvault Cloud is expensive, and there is room for the price to be 10-15 percent lower than what they are charging currently.
What needs improvement with ThreatWise?
Commvault Cloud is a very powerful tool, but it can be improved in various ways. Commvault Cloud can be improved by simplifying its interface, reducing configuration complexity, and making more adv...
What is your primary use case for ThreatWise?
Commvault Cloud's main core use case is backup and recovery for protecting on-premises workloads, databases, the file system, NAS, and on-premises infrastructure. Another primary use case is immuta...
What needs improvement with Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
Overall, I am happy with Veeam Kasten, but I think the multi-cluster management dashboard can be improved. When managing multiple Kubernetes clusters, it would be better if the backup jobs, policie...
What is your primary use case for Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
The main use case for Veeam Kasten is to protect Kubernetes applications and ensure disaster recovery. We use it to take backups of applications, namespaces, persistent volumes, PVCs, and Kubernete...
What advice do you have for others considering Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
In my experience, Veeam Kasten does not have artificial intelligence features that I use in my daily work, so I cannot really comment on the accuracy of the artificial intelligence outputs. What I ...
 

Also Known As

Commvault Complete Data Protection, Commvault Backup & Recovery, Commvault HyperScale X, Metallic, ThreatWise
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz Company
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault Cloud vs. Veeam Kasten and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
919,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.