No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Collibra [Private Offer Only] vs Dice Tech Recruiting comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Collibra [Private Offer Only]
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
497th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dice Tech Recruiting
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Yuval Rapaport - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Management at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Data cataloging has improved quality monitoring and automated lineage supports deeper insights
Integration to data sources and reliability and availability are the advantages in Collibra [Private Offer Only] that really stand out for me, and I believe those are probably the two most important points. I am working with the automated data lineage feature in Collibra [Private Offer Only]. The automated data lineage feature helps with traceability in the organization because it makes the catalog live; rather than the catalog being a spreadsheet essentially with definitions, users can not only find the business definition, but then also see which tables and columns actually create this business term. That's very powerful. Regarding intelligent workflow capabilities, I believe it impacts data stewardship tasks within my team by improving and helping in making and creating those definitions. It is essential to us that Collibra [Private Offer Only] integrates with other data systems in our environment, and we are using it, and it's quite effective. The integration aspect of Collibra [Private Offer Only] is important because it provides data integration that delivers lineage into Databricks, Salesforce, and soon also SAP.
SS
Recruiting Manager at QUANTUM INTEGRATORS GROUP, LLC
Recruiting has become more efficient and consistently delivers strong candidates for every role
Improvements could be made for Dice Tech Recruiting, such as verifying the profiles uploaded by individuals outside the US who are pretending to be in the USA. This would help recruiters reach out to the right candidates, potentially by adding a feature for verification with an ID. I would like to add that while I use mostly Boolean search on Dice Tech Recruiting, sometimes there are glitches resulting in irrelevant results being shown, which does not help in finding the right match. I would suggest that Dice Tech Recruiting should only provide profiles that match our searches. I believe I have covered all the suggestions I could make for improvements needed in Dice Tech Recruiting, but I remain open to suggesting additional features in the future as different scenarios may appear.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest advantage of Collibra is that it is quite business-friendly."
"Integration to data sources and reliability and availability are the advantages in Collibra [Private Offer Only] that really stand out for me, and I believe those are probably the two most important points."
"Using Dice Tech Recruiting has saved me a significant amount of time in sourcing candidates, and while I cannot share specific metrics due to company policy, I know that my investment was low and my revenue was high on an annual basis."
"Dice Tech Recruiting positively impacts my organization by supporting us in finding good resources with genuine knowledge and experience about the technology we are submitting for candidates."
"Since I have been using Dice Tech Recruiting, I have noticed that I receive 90 to 95 percent of matched candidates as per the job description I share with the client, and I get confirmation most of the time."
"Dice Tech Recruiting offers the best features for finding the right candidate within the rate or through the simple listing that I can use, making it easy to identify the best candidate."
"Dice Tech Recruiting provides a very good impact compared to other portals in that I can find the exact candidate."
"Dice Tech Recruiting has impacted our organization positively, and we have generated a huge amount of revenue, achieving approximately 50% growth."
"Dice Tech Recruiting has a positive impact on our organization by helping us source qualified technology candidates more efficiently."
"The impact of Dice Tech Recruiting on my work is significant because the filtering feature allows us to quickly find candidates with the right visa status."
 

Cons

"If I had to rate support from zero to 10, with 10 being the best, I would give them 6.5."
"The search capabilities are terrible in Collibra [Private Offer Only] because you can't do free search."
"I do sometimes get irrelevant results. When I am looking for a product manager, I would sometimes get recommendations for data engineers, but it is more on the relevant side."
"The accuracy of Dice Tech Recruiting's AI capabilities is not 100%, and I would say it is 50/50, as there is a lot of work needed in the AI stack, so sometimes it finds not exactly appropriate candidates; for instance, when I am looking for an AI developer, it does not match my criteria and finds other candidates too."
"I would like to request that if someone uploads their profile on Dice Tech Recruiting, at least an email ID should be required."
"Dice Tech Recruiting is a very effective platform for technology recruiting, but there are a few areas where it could be improved."
"I would like to add that while I use mostly Boolean search on Dice Tech Recruiting, sometimes there are glitches resulting in irrelevant results being shown, which does not help in finding the right match."
"I believe Dice Tech Recruiting could improve by providing me the candidate email ID because I have sometimes not received it."
"There are a few things I think should be improved in Dice Tech Recruiting, such as candidates not providing email addresses and contact numbers, leading to wasted time when we cannot reach them after screening their resumes."
"Dice Tech Recruiting's AI could be improved because it is not providing accurate results."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
32%
Construction Company
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise35
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Collibra [Private Offer Only]?
There are some areas where Collibra [Private Offer Only] could be improved. Earlier, they didn't have this data quality module and the AI part, but now I think I have not recently used that fea...
What is your primary use case for Collibra [Private Offer Only]?
My major use case is basically on glossary and business glossary. Among other features, I see a Data Lineage feature with automated Data Lineage capability. I do not use Data Lineage.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dice Tech Recruiting?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been positive. It was already set up when I joined the company.
What needs improvement with Dice Tech Recruiting?
Everything is fine with Dice Tech Recruiting and does not need improvement. I have no additional thoughts about Dice Tech Recruiting as everything is good.
What is your primary use case for Dice Tech Recruiting?
My main use case for Dice Tech Recruiting is to provide the GED in it.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra [Private Offer Only] vs. Dice Tech Recruiting and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.