Codebeamer vs Inflectra SpiraTeam comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,910 views|3,038 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Inflectra Logo
305 views|127 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Inflectra SpiraTeam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jorge Ambrosio
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful.""The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""It is a stable solution.""CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance."

More Codebeamer Pros →

"The solution is fast and very accessible.""The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Pros →

Cons
"During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.""The search and replace feature within the tool itself could be improved.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs.""Usability needs to be improved.""It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now.""It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

More Codebeamer Cons →

"They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options.""It would be great if they worked more closely with other solutions. There needs to be better integration with the platform for development purposes."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,910
    Comparisons
    3,038
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    425
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    305
    Comparisons
    127
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    SpiraTeam
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    Need to manage your entire project lifecycle? From requirements and test cases, to tasks and code SpiraTeam has you covered. Powerful, straightforward, and flexible, SpiraTeam helps you get started fast. With SpiraTeam, manage your tasks and bugs quickly and easily, sync them with your team, and get back to developing. Integrated version control, testing (manual and automated), and customizable reporting, help you track it all.

    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    Cenduit, Maas Database Applications, DHHS Tasmania, Rota Yokogawa, ASI Business Solutions, ComputaCenter
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Inflectra SpiraTeam is ranked 21st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while Inflectra SpiraTeam is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTeam writes "Great technical support with excellent integration and a fairly easy initial setup". Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and IBM Rational ALM, whereas Inflectra SpiraTeam is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.