Codebeamer vs Inflectra SpiraTeam comparison

PTC and Inflectra are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.4, while Inflectra is ranked #22. PTC holds a 8.8% mindshare in ALM, compared to Inflectra’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

Codebeamer

Read 15 Codebeamer reviews

3,428 Views
2,791 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Inflectra SpiraTeam

Read 2 Inflectra SpiraTeam reviews

236 Views
68 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Codebeamer

Inflectra SpiraTeam

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Codebeamer and Inflectra SpiraTeam are ALM software products. Codebeamer distinguishes itself with its robust workflow automation and scalability, appealing to larger enterprises.

Features: Codebeamer focuses on workflow automation, requirements management, and scalability, making it suitable for large enterprises with complex needs. Inflectra SpiraTeam stands out with test management, release management, and customization capabilities, suiting diverse team requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Codebeamer integrates well with large systems but may require significant setup time. Inflectra SpiraTeam offers streamlined deployment with effective customer support for faster onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer involves a higher setup cost, justified by its extensive features aimed at long-term ROI for complex organizations. Inflectra SpiraTeam offers a budget-friendly initial investment with quicker ROI, beneficial for small to medium-sized teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Inflectra SpiraTeam

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 8.8%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra SpiraTeam is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed

Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill ( /products/ptc-windchill-reviews ) face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.

Read full review

Jorge Ambrosio

Quality Management Office (QMO) Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Great technical support with excellent integration and a fairly easy initial setup

The integration is really better than it was in the past. The initial setup was pretty simple. Their documentation is excellent. The solution is fast and very accessible. Organization time is free of charge in terms of licensing. This is until you finalize the migration from one tool to the other. That way, we don't need to pay to license two solutions at the same time. The maintenance team doing the support gives you a lot of knowledge. They often have up to ten years of support experience. Those leading the support teams are very knowledgeable. There seems to be very little turnover or team change, which helps retain the knowledge

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability."

"It is a stable solution."

"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing."

"There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful."

"Codebeamer is user-friendly"

"One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance."

"The key features of Codebeamer include templates and basic structures, most of which are created and readily available for deployment out of the box, reducing deployment time."

"Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers."

More Codebeamer pros

"The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple."

"The solution is fast and very accessible."

Cons

"The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"One improvement could be to reduce the system or server requirements. For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded."

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."

"Usability needs to be improved."

"I would like to see more, easily trackable reports."

"The primary challenge is adapting the standard product to our workflows and specific needs."

"The search and replace feature within the tool itself could be improved."

"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

More Codebeamer cons

"They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options."

"It would be great if they worked more closely with other solutions. There needs to be better integration with the platform for development purposes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."

"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

31%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?

The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?

Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition. Customers prefer it due to its pricing, scalability, features, functionality, and integration with multiple tools. On a scale of one to ten, I would...

See all answers

What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?

There should be more integration tools available. Although Codebeamer has a substantial amount of integration options with multiple tools, new technologies and software constantly emerge. Therefore...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer

Compared 27% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer

Compared 27% of the time

Jira vs Codebeamer

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer

Compared 7% of the time

More Codebeamer Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer

April 2025

Download Codebeamer product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2025

Download Inflectra SpiraTeam product report

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM

SpiraTeam

Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

PTC

Need to manage your entire project lifecycle? From requirements and test cases, to tasks and code SpiraTeam has you covered. Powerful, straightforward, and flexible, SpiraTeam helps you get started fast. With SpiraTeam, manage your tasks and bugs quickly and easily, sync them with your team, and get back to developing. Integrated version control, testing (manual and automated), and customizable reporting, help you track it all.

Inflectra

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault

Cenduit, Maas Database Applications, DHHS Tasmania, Rota Yokogawa, ASI Business Solutions, ComputaCenter

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam

April 2025

Free Report: Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam

Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Codebeamer vs. Inflectra SpiraTeam report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.