Codebeamer vs TFS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,948 views|3,057 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
Read 93 TFS reviews
10,136 views|5,968 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. TFS Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance.""It is a stable solution.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful.""There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful."

More Codebeamer Pros →

"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder.""The interface is good with TFS.""I like the Kanban board. It is very useful in terms of seeing who is working on what and what the current status of work is.""The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.""Stability is okay.""The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch.""The tool's installation is straightforward.""The most valuable feature is the backlog."

More TFS Pros →

Cons
"Usability needs to be improved.""Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup.""During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.""It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The search and replace feature within the tool itself could be improved."

More Codebeamer Cons →

"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution.""I understand Microsoft is phasing out TFS in favor of Git, so I would steer anyone interested in TFS to look into Git.""As an end-user, I expect the solution's performance to be faster while staying as stable as possible.""TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online.""The test management interface is not very handy.""The tool needs improvement in stability.""The execution of test cases could stand improvement.""The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."

More TFS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs."
  • "TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run."
  • "Use the Microsoft recommended “seat-based” licensing model. This allows a single developer with multiple machines to consume only one client license."
  • "If running TFS on-premise is expensive, maybe you could consider moving to the Cloud and use the Visual Studio Team Services."
  • "It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools."
  • "The pricing is reasonable at this time."
  • "TFS is more competitively priced than some other solutions."
  • "We pay subscription fees on a yearly basis and the price is reasonable."
  • More TFS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:Honestly, I don't think too much about what the product needs to improve. The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's UI is not friendly. I just think that… more »
    Top Answer:TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft's technical team is supportive.
    Top Answer:There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    10,136
    Comparisons
    5,968
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    391
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    PTC Integrity logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Polarion ALM logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Jira logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    OpenText ALM Octane logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    Jira logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Rally Software logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    Team Foundation Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.

    Visual Studio TFS Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:

    • Build automation. TFS enables users to create definitions that can easily automate any and all tasks that are critical to the development of their applications. Businesses can utilize features that are built into TFS to accomplish preset tasks that can help them create the application of their choice. This can include enabling them to run automated tests when the need arises. Additionally, users can create custom tasks that will run automatically and allow users to focus their attention on the areas that most demand their focus.
    • Security. TFS is designed with the security of a user’s DevOps in mind. It enables an organization to restrict user permissions so that only developers that are meant to have access to particular parts of the development process can perform tasks related to those sections. It segments the development process to reduce the possibility of sensitive data being stolen.
    • Enables product rollbacks. TFS keeps copies of past versions of the organization’s application. Users can sift through the different versions that are available and can redeploy the version that best fits their needs should it ever become necessary to do so.

    Visual Studio TFS Features

    • Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.

    • Project management. Organizations can leverage the wealth of project management features that TFS offers and ensure that their projects run as smoothly as possible. Project managers are able to use TFS to control every aspect of their project, from the planning stage until the application’s development has reached its conclusion.
    • Reporting. TFS enables users to generate reports that leverage critical metrics and provide them with important insights into the applications that they are creating. These comprehensive reports can be secured so that only users with the proper level of clearance can access them.

    Reviews from Real Users

    TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.

    Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”

    Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”

    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization52%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise33%
    Buyer's Guide
    Codebeamer vs. TFS
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and OpenText ALM Octane, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and Tricentis Tosca. See our Codebeamer vs. TFS report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.