CockroachDB vs Tibero comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cockroach Logo
4,096 views|2,720 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
TmaxSoft Logo
945 views|804 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Tibero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds.""CockroachDB is highly reliable.""The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities.""The initial setup and deployment are simple.""I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance.""The product has valuable security features.""The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations.""The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

More CockroachDB Pros →

"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database.""Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc.""Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast.""Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."

More Tibero Pros →

Cons
"The platform could be more extensible.""The product must improve its disaster recovery features.""We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning.""The initial setup and pricing could be improved.""CockroachDB needs to improve store processes.""Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network.""The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling.""I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

More CockroachDB Cons →

"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded.""In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."

More Tibero Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."
  • "The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."
  • "The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."
  • More CockroachDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."
  • "The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."
  • More Tibero Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.
    Top Answer:I find the serverless offer a bit confusing. The price is a function of the maximum database size. A single SELECT can use a number of request units, for example. If the throughput is high enough, you… more »
    Top Answer:Cockroach nodes were installed in the following: 1. Single host, triple nodes (containers): for evaluation on a low-end PC. 2. Single host, triple nodes (process): to test applications against a… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,096
    Comparisons
    2,720
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    945
    Comparisons
    804
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Citus Data logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Amazon Aurora logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 53% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Altibase logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

    CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

    Tibero by TmaxSoft bridges the gap between legacy relational databases and the new paradigm of running workloads in virtualized data centers and the Cloud, allowing enterprises to fully leverage their investment by embracing a simple, true utilization licensing model.

    Sample Customers
    Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias
    NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Tibero is ranked 25th in Relational Databases Tools. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while Tibero is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and SQL Server, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server and Altibase.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.