CockroachDB vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise comparison

Cockroach and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while SAP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. Cockroach holds a 3.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,677 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 12 SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise reviews

1,171 Views
609 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and CockroachDB compete as database solutions, each offering distinct advantages. CockroachDB appears to have the upper hand due to its modern features and adaptability, despite a higher cost.

Features: SAP ASE provides robust transactional support, scalability for enterprise environments, and strong security features. CockroachDB is recognized for its cloud-native design, excellent distributed database capabilities, and resilience against failures.

Room for Improvement: SAP ASE could enhance its feature set to compete with more modern databases. Its update frequency and adaptation to new technologies can be improved. CockroachDB may benefit from refining user experience for ease of use, improving support consistency, and reducing complexity in configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ASE is known for its well-documented setup process and responsive customer support, providing a smoother deployment process. CockroachDB offers advanced distributed features, but it may present a steeper learning curve and less consistent support experiences, which could complicate deployment.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ASE's initial setup cost can be high, affecting initial ROI, although it offers proven stability. CockroachDB may require a lower upfront investment, offering better scalability potential and enhanced long-term ROI, although questions regarding its cost-effectiveness remain due to premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

More CockroachDB pros

"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."

"The actual interface is good."

"Provides very good integration."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."

"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

More CockroachDB cons

"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

"In my opinion, product support is not that great from SAP because they have already declared the end-of-date for SAP ASE. They will be stopping product support."

"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 22% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 16% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 69% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

April 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP ASE

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.