CloudSphere vs Cloudify comparison

Cloudify and CloudSphere are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #40, while CloudSphere is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Cloudify holds a 1.6% mindshare in CM, compared to CloudSphere’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CloudSphere users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

1,591 Views
1,527 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

Read 5 CloudSphere reviews

1,770 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudify

CloudSphere

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudSphere and Cloudify both compete in the cloud management domain. CloudSphere seems to have an edge in pricing and support areas, whereas Cloudify is favored for its feature richness.

Features: CloudSphere provides automation and resource management, comprehensive visibility, and control over environments. Cloudify offers strong scalability, orchestration capabilities, and extensive customization options, excelling in complex infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: CloudSphere could enhance its server stability and minimize latency issues further. Providing better error handling and broader multi-cloud integrations would be beneficial. Cloudify could improve by simplifying its interface, expanding its native plugin offerings, and reducing the complexity required for advanced customizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere is noted for its straightforward setup and effective customer support facilitating smooth transitions. Cloudify's flexible deployment models and detailed support resources cater to organizations needing precise control over deployments.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere generally offers lower initial costs, attractive to budget-conscious organizations with rapid ROI. Cloudify, with potentially higher startup expenses, provides significant value through its comprehensive features, resulting in strong long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. Cloudify Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Cloudify

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Management

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudSphere is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudSphere	1.6%
Cloudify	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Works very well for advanced service chaining requirements and has extremely advanced engineers for support

We had a manager who thought that Cloudify could be used as a replacement for Horizon in OpenStack, but we found that Cloudify lacked the user interface or GUI for doing multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. Cloudify was really good at launching, for example, firewalls and configuring them and doing service chaining and rather advanced things like that, but it didn't meet the requirements for a basic platform management solution. It is something that seems to work better as a bolt-on or an augmented solution. It is a bit mis-marketed as a Cloud Management solution. It is not that. It is more of a service orchestration and automation tool. It is very good at doing that, but it fails to meet basic platform management requirements. Once you have it running, you can't really do anything with it without writing code and scripts. It requires a full-time DevOps person to use it. We deployed a Palo Alto firewall with it. That's basically what the project was for us, and it worked flawlessly once we got it finished, but it took another 12 weeks to get all of the automation and everything else coded, tested, and working. There is certainly a place for this technology, but when we got rid of OpenStack and moved to VMware, we either had to go with the vRealize Automation Suite to do this kind of automation, or we had to find an alternative solution to manage the private cloud. So, we put Cloudify in, but we really couldn't find it useful for basic platform administration tasks.

Read full review

Vibhor Gupta

Migration Customer Solution Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Great discovery, good support, and generally reliable

The area they need to focus most on is the capability of assessment and the landing zones. It’s lacking right now. Cloud transformation has four to five cases, including planning, discovery, assessment, and the MVC, which is called the minimal viable cloud. That comes with the architecture design or landing zone creation, where we will create resources on the cloud which we are provisioning. If we are moving onto the cloud platform, AWS, or zero GCP, we need an account. We need resources to be able to compute the network. Most organizations have their landing zone process and know how to create the resources account, compute the network layer and the security layer. However, this landing zone creation is not there in CloudSphere as a feature. It cannot create any of the cloud providers' accounts or their network security computing as a part of the orchestration layer. That orchestration layer is missing in this product. It will not discover all the applications, although they also have the catalog. They are constantly announcing their catalog to identify applications based on the service which we are discovering. 50% of the time, the application will discover automatically. However, for the other 50%, we need to find the application based on its running process. That's the automation method that we need to follow and that they call blueprint. We need to create those blueprints and then we need to tag those applications. That is the one process that takes time when we do the discovery. One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running. It will not discover SAP or some kinds of applications that are running on those inside the application of the servers as well. When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera. We cannot scan the 1,000 servers together. That causes it to take time. There’s a graph missing. It shows where all the servers have interdependencies; however, when we do actual work, it will not work properly in terms of what we present to the customer.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Product has given us the ability to catch early scaling issues that many companies hit on with private clouds."

"It enables a single platform to communicate with the entire infrastructure."

"Cloudify provides the infrastructure-as-code, as well as operational action capabilities (orchestrated startups or upgrades, and more)."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements; it really works well there, and it fits the best."

"We have been able to realize ROI for our customers in the form of reduced cost, higher top line and increased valuation through improved profitability."

"Valuable features are auto-scaling and load balancing."

"TOSCA model allows modeling the application rather than the automation. It is a machine-readable representation of the application and its infrastructure, which can be used for other things too, not just for the orchestration (e.g. enterprise architecture big picture, who connects to whom)."

"This is a somewhat complex solution for very complex use cases where there are multiple cloud vendors, multiple infrastructures, and multiple configurations."

More Cloudify pros

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

More CloudSphere pros

Cons

"We'd like to see the maturity of the plugins continue, including Amazon EMR and others."

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. It is a leader in the niche area that they like to perform in, but it only does about 30% of top-tier advanced functions of platform management. It doesn't meet about 70% of what you need to manage a private cloud platform."

"There were some issues with deploying the solution on OpenStack Mitaka."

"Cloudify is not a turn-key solution, nor designed as such."

"Error handling could be improved; GUI is lacking with respect to user privileges and connectivity."

"I did encounter any issues with scalability."

"Unlike the Docker environment, Cloudify takes time for configuration and its learning curve."

More Cloudify cons

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

More CloudSphere cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"The product is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Logistics Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

CloudBolt vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

Tieto OneCloud vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 7% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Connectria IaaS Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

May 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

May 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Also Known As

No data available

HyperCloud

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. Cloudify

April 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. Cloudify

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. Cloudify and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. Cloudify report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.