Cloudian HyperStore vs QoreStor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cloudian and Quest Software are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Cloudian is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.1, while Quest Software is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 83% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Cloudian HyperStore and QoreStor compete in the data management and storage optimization category. Cloudian HyperStore appears to have the upper hand in distributed capabilities, while QoreStor excels in storage optimization and flexibility.

Features: Cloudian HyperStore offers robust features like S3 compatibility, versioning, and data protection, integrating with services like Veeam for cost savings. In contrast, QoreStor shines with deduplication, compression, and flexibility across various hardware, essential for cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Room for Improvement: Cloudian HyperStore could enhance user experience, integration capabilities, and ease of upgrades, along with AI-driven data management improvements. QoreStor may benefit from a better management interface and enhanced ransomware protection. Both products require advancements in automation and intelligent data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudian HyperStore, though offering diverse deployment options like hybrid cloud, has a complex setup needing support for installation. QoreStor also demands better customer service and diagnostic processes, even with similar deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudian HyperStore is cost-effective and competitive, offering licensing savings and CAPEX returns comparable to AWS. QoreStor provides an attractive pricing model for gradual capacity needs, promoting licensing flexibility as data expands. Both solutions offer potential ROI, aligning with user requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everpure FlashArray

Featured Reviews

Cristian Ion

Senior Information Technology Engineer at Eta2u

All-flash storage has unified my clients’ workloads and has reduced TCO through efficient data services

The pricing and licensing of Everpure FlashArray is a problem because Everpure is considered more expensive than competitors. IBM, Lenovo, and Dell are more aggressive on prices. It is a very complicated market, especially now, and I understand the prices are higher at Everpure because of the software and all the enhancements it has. However, in this competitive market, we have a big problem selling to customers that are on a tight budget. A product with better pricing would be a win in the end. The RC or C20, for example, was a very good product that I could sell more easily than other options. Everpure FlashArray//C is sufficient for most workloads and virtualization workloads if you do not have very large databases. A product like that helps, and perhaps a new product in the future that is a little cheaper than the current options would be a possibility to gain more market share. I see the return on investment clearly from using Everpure FlashArray, but the challenge is selling it to customers for the first time. There are many customers who fall in the sweet spot where they are too small for an X or even a C model. They need something a little cheaper, they have the money for a cheaper version, and they need the performance of a Pure system. These customers could be more easily approached if Everpure offers a version of a local device in the future that is even cheaper than the C-class. I am trying now to help customers understand the concept behind AG1. I know that AG1 is not profitable if capacity is less than 50 terabytes. However, some customers would be very willing to pay for 25 terabytes in a cloud operated by Pure and to have it accessible with very good speed. We will see what the future brings.

Read full review

Naved Siddique

Sr Infrastructure Engineer at American Express

Object storage has reduced costs and improves data protection for web application workloads

Cloudian HyperStore can be improved by making upgrades easier. Currently, I see that upgrades are very complicated, and most of the time I require Cloudian support whenever I want to upgrade. I think Cloudian has the opportunity to improve in self-service capabilities. If they make upgrades less vendor-dependent, that would be beneficial. I would also like to add that more automation APIs would be valuable. If more APIs were available for S3 compatible tasks, that would be great. I rate the product eight because if they make updates easier, make firmware upgrades easier, make compaction available on CMC instead of requiring scripts, make node cleanup straightforward, make forecasting simple, make capacity planning easy, and provide self-healing opportunities, I believe the rating would be a ten.

Read full review

Marcus W

Works at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Backup storage has shrunk dramatically with deduplication but still needs stronger security options

The air gap feature is something I'd really like to see in QoreStor. There's no native air gap capability right now, and for security-conscious environments, that's a gap. The configuration export is also limited in QoreStor. If you want to document your setup or migrate configuration to a new instance, it requires more manual work than it should.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I appreciate most about Everpure FlashArray is that it performs compression and deduplication fantastically."

"I can personally state that the Pure Storage Flash Systems are the best built and Pure has the utmost professional customer care."

"The scalability options are very nice because you can scale it much better and faster. The scalability was there in the previous environment also, but this is far better than what we had before. It basically helps the user in case they are looking for more storage. We can scale it much faster."

"It allows engineers to focus on other things rather than doing the more manual tasks. It automates tasks, so the ease of use is extreme. It simplifies the storage."

"It is always out of the box, and ready to use."

"Pure Storage FlashArray is a good product with minimal management requirements once set up correctly and helped reduce our storage footprint from EMC."

"All our junior partners can administer the storage arrays. It is simple and easy to use. We don't have to dedicate a whole team of full time people to work on it."

"Compared to other storage boxes, Everpure FlashArray is very useful because it is cost-effective and requires less work."

More Everpure FlashArray pros

"Cloudian HyperStore has been helpful for us, and we have not faced any major issues with it."

"Considering a customer's need for a cost-effective solution, Cloudian HyperStore fits well for data protection scenarios."

"The most valuable feature is the durability, as it is very durable and that is particularly important for our backups."

"Cloudian HyperStore is one hundred percent stable."

"Cloudian HyperStore has significantly improved our organization by providing scalable, reliable, and cost-effective object storage for our growing volumes of unstructured data."

"Cloudian HyperStore impacted my organization positively because we started to use it at least eight years ago, and at that time, we did not have many choices on the market, and I do not recall a truly good enterprise solution for using S3 storage in a private data center."

"The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution, as it is software-based and makes it possible to select one or the other and change the hardware as needed."

"Cloudian HyperStore has positively impacted my organization by reducing costs, which is one of the biggest advantages I can see from Cloudian HyperStore."

More Cloudian HyperStore pros

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"The extreme compression of data is a big thing for us. We were looking for an online backup solution, and QoreStor is very good in terms of data compression. It helps us minimize the required storage in the Blob Storage environment."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises. We've been using the same devices for quite a while, and so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution. The advantage here is even if we had to retire the hardware tomorrow, the QoreStor part doesn't change. We just have to have additional hardware and put the solution back on whatever hardware we pick and it'll do the same thing."

"The features we use for the data deduplication are nice because we're able to back up a much larger amount of data, yet it doesn't necessarily take up that much data on the devices."

"Not having to be onsite to swap tapes on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, alone, has really paid for its usage through the savings in time."

"This software solution can be installed on many different types of hardware, which makes it very flexible. We can run it on virtual machines or virtual servers, providing convenience for solutions of varying sizes, from small to large."

"Overall, it simplifies the management of backup and gives me a more secure feeling that my data is going to be available if I need to retrieve it."

More QoreStor pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial to have a health check command that can be run from the CLI to ensure that all hardware components are functioning properly rather than having to enable remote access and connect to support for a health check."

"Improved reporting on the deduplication and compression functionality would be beneficial."

"The data reduction that we had initially anticipated when we bought Pure and we move over, is way lower than the expected reduction. It depends on the workloads, of course. But that has been a challenge at times."

"The problem is that we can only make a few groups, around five or six groups. I like groups and we need a lot of them. We had to put all the information in only a few groups and cannot make a more detailed separation of them."

"I can't see where they can make anything better, unless, of course, they lower their prices even more."

"I feel like there is too much automation; the user doesn't have any manual input."

"The scalability of the solution is not as good as it probably could be."

"I like what they're doing, but some of my customers complain that they do not have all the bells and whistles and knobs to fine-tune workloads that some of the competitors have. In my opinion, that's good. All customers don't have dedicated storage gurus, and they can get themselves into trouble if they fine-tune too many of those high-performance knobs, but they do get knocked down. Pure Storage takes a hit in the minds and opinions of some of the customers because they cannot customize things as much as compared to a legacy storage provider's appliance such as NetApp, Dell EMC, or even HPE. I personally think 95% of my customers are better off letting the system fine-tune itself. That was something that you needed to do 12 or 15 years ago, but now with all-flash, the technology can handle what it needs to handle. Customers just end up shooting themselves in the foot if they are tweaking too many default settings."

More Everpure FlashArray cons

"The initial cost has not been recouped because of performance issues, leading to a lack of customer trust with this product, as I cannot sell it quickly enough before the new licensing costs hit, resulting in losing money by the end."

"I suppose the cost could always be lower and they should continue to add the latest Amazon S3 features."

"Cloudian HyperStore's scalability is not as good as I wanted it to be because if I want to add anything new to the current environment, the process is extremely lengthy and takes a lot of time."

"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use. I would like to see it more user-friendly and easy to use."

"Cloudian HyperStore can be improved because it cannot simply be left to the business owner to operate its software."

"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."

"It is not easy to maintain, which is a big drawback to the solution."

"Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well."

More Cloudian HyperStore cons

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something. So that when we don't do a backup, we want the QoreStor to stay offline. It would be a nice feature to have."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing. I worked a lot with Quest engineers, especially in the early days when we were first testing it and trying it out. I actually had some of the developers working with us at one point because they were going through these point releases, and I was having trouble getting it to work in this S3-compatible situation. We got it all working eventually, but setup is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"The installation could use improvement. The initial installation was a little touchy and it's not really user-installable. You have to have a connection to support to install."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

More QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While it comes with a higher price tag, this investment often translates to significant improvements in performance."

"When we bought the unit, we bought per capacity. So, the licensing is per capacity, and the only thing that we have to buy every year or every three years is maintenance. Included in that maintenance is the upgrade of the controllers every three years at no cost to us."

"We evaluated Oracle and Hitachi, but Pure Storage had the better pricing."

"Price per terabyte is substantially higher than their competition. We would like to see it drop."

"In terms of other contemporary arrays, Pure is something you need to have a use case for, as it's not priced for you to buy one off-the-shelf. If you have a use case, heavy lift Oracle Databases, any type of noticeable virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), or need low latency and high throughput, you should consider all-flash at least and probably Pure Storage."

"It's priced higher than the market."

"I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It could be improved."

"The price-to-performance is good. I looked at Pure about three to four years back, but the price-to-performance wasn't right for us. Now, it's right."

More Everpure FlashArray pricing and cost advice

"The solution is cheap."

"Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	74
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	162

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?

Both are great platforms, but if you are considering all flash solutions, I would recommend you to consider Pure Stor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashArray?

When comparing cost, I find that the cost is either the same or slightly higher, but that is returned by the ease of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashArray?

The only thing I think could be improved is price. The price is the main concern for our customers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperStore?

Cloudian HyperStore can be improved because it cannot simply be left to the business owner to operate its software. Y...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore?

Our main use case for Cloudian HyperStore is cloud backup of large data, such as patient information and research inf...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudian HyperStore?

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Cloudian HyperStore a seven. I give it a seven because it needs a lot of impro...

See all answers

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a bac...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what abo...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp AFF vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 6% of the time

VAST Data vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 5% of the time

More Everpure FlashArray Competitors

Dell ObjectScale vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 11% of the time

Scality RING vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 9% of the time

Scality ARTESCA vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 7% of the time

Qumulo vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudian HyperStore Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashArray

November 2026

Download Everpure FlashArray product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore

November 2026

Download Cloudian HyperStore product report

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

October 2026

Download QoreStor product report

Also Known As

Pure Storage FlashArray

HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage

QoreStor

Overview

The FlashArray family delivers consistent, high-performance data services across block, file, and object workloads. As part of the Everpure Platform, it provides the foundation for a unified data plane, enabling applications to reliably access, protect, and manage data across environments with simplicity and predictability. With built-in capabilities such as inline data reduction, snapshots, replication, and ransomware resilience, FlashArray ensures efficient operations, protected data, and consistent application uptime.

As the foundation of the (unified) data plane, FlashArray enables policy-driven automation, monitoring, and centralized management while integrating across cloud and on-premises environments. Built on an Evergreen architecture, it supports non-disruptive upgrades and continuous performance improvements over time while simplifying operations at scale.

What Key Features Does FlashArray Offer?

Simplicity and Speed: Easy management and rapid performance enhancements.
Data Reduction: Effective deduplication and compression.
Flash Architecture: Seamless upgrades and outstanding resilience.
VMware Integration: Excellent compatibility with virtualization platforms.
Predictive Analytics: Strong insights for proactive management.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Reliability: Proactive support with minimal downtime.
Efficiency: Reduced storage footprint and enhanced data management.
Performance: Faster processing speeds and low latency.
User Experience: Simplified management with Evergreen model.

In industries like finance, banking, and healthcare, FlashArray supports high-performance storage needs focusing on virtualization and database environments. Employed for VMware workloads, disaster recovery, and storage provisioning, it ensures application performance in private or hybrid cloud setups while enhancing management of virtualized environments.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Cloudian HyperStore offers integrated data management capabilities, known for its durability, scalability, and Amazon S3 compatibility. Users leverage its data protection and hybrid cloud features for efficient storage centralization.

Cloudian HyperStore enhances data management with features like versioning, erasure coding, and immutability. Its compatibility with Amazon S3 and integration with backup tools like Veeam ensures flexibility and seamless infrastructure management. The RESTful API stack supports integration with various environments, while its hybrid cloud capabilities offer scalable and cost-effective solutions. User feedback suggests improving user-friendliness, AI-driven data tiering, AWS integration, and stability. Users seek better upgrade processes, more automation APIs, two-factor authentication, and compatibility with HyperFile. An open-source edition and clear S3 feature transparency are requested. It also offers scalability and replaces tape libraries, making it suitable for long-term archive storage and unstructured data management across different locations.

What are Cloudian HyperStore's most important features?

Durability: Ensures reliable data protection through advanced data management techniques.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs within diverse organizational infrastructures.
Amazon S3 Compatibility: Seamless integration with S3-enabled applications and storage.
Data Management: Offers versioning, erasure coding, and immutability for enhanced data control.
Integration: Connects with tools like Veeam and uses a RESTful API stack for flexible deployment.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall storage costs with scalable data management solutions.
Resource Management: Simplifies infrastructure management and improves data accessibility.
Hybrid Cloud Capabilities: Integrates on-premises and cloud resources seamlessly.
Performance: Supports multiple server environments, saving time and resources.

Cloudian HyperStore is used in industries focusing on data protection and archive storage, often replacing traditional tape libraries. Businesses across sectors deploy it for unstructured data management, S3-compatible storage, and web applications, prioritizing scalability and compliance. Its implementation in diverse environments aids in efficient resource allocation and data sharing.

Cloudian

QoreStor offers low maintenance and flexibility, integrating with diverse backup software and hardware. It highlights data deduplication, reducing storage significantly, with compression benefits. Compatible with Linux, it enhances security and supports replication and archiving to the cloud.

QoreStor is a versatile data management tool, valued for its adaptability across platforms, including virtual machines. Users leverage its features for data deduplication, compression, and efficient storage management, ensuring cost-effective offsite recovery options. Integrating smoothly with applications like Veeam, NetVault, and vRanger, QoreStor provides reliable storage solutions that are affordably priced. While installation and backup software integration could be smoother, and the management interface more user-friendly, QoreStor remains a competitive option with strong security benefits and cloud capabilities.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Data Deduplication: Significantly reduces storage requirements.
Compression: Optimizes storage efficiency.
Cloud Archiving: Facilitates easy replication and archiving to cloud environments.
Linux Compatibility: Enhances security through robust integration.
Platform Flexibility: Operates across virtual and diverse environments.

What benefits and ROI to expect?

Cost Reduction: Efficient storage management reduces expenses.
Enhanced Security: Linux compatibility ensures higher security levels.
Storage Efficiency: Deduplication and compression reduce storage needs.
Cloud Flexibility: Encourages efficient backup and recovery through cloud options.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing needs with platform flexibility.

In industries needing reliable data management, QoreStor serves as a primary backup and replication resource. Companies use it to enhance data deduplication and storage management, integrating it with tools like Veeam. This facilitates both onsite and cost-effective offsite data operations, promoting seamless cloud interactions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas

NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor

September 2026

Free Report: Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudian HyperStore vs. QoreStor report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.